gabevh3
Registered User
- Oct 13, 2005
- 2,843
- 2,591
20 next year might be better than 12 this yearEspecially with the new coach I don't see us picking higher than 12 next year. I'd just keep it.
20 next year might be better than 12 this yearEspecially with the new coach I don't see us picking higher than 12 next year. I'd just keep it.
Yeah that's definitely worth considering also.20 next year might be better than 12 this year
High floor / low ceiling.We’re going to take the 37th ranked guy anyway
Kakko is an RFA!Give up the pick so we can offer sheet someone #vision
Either the pick or Garand.We got 48 hours to give the pick or not to Pittsburgh, correct?
But you didn't address the general notion that next year's draft is considered much deeper.they’re not moving the pick…at least to pitt. Drury is on coach #3 and has expectations to assemble a winner. Realistically, this team with minimal change should be a playoff team. I’d imagine, for better or worse, there will be at least one significant to huge deal completed this summer. The cap situation that creates will dictate how much more change there is in terms of volume of roster turnover beyond that.
I think there’s a low probability of them actually making the pick, but virtually none that they hand it to pitt. Unless they get a deal in place for someone with a team who would prefer rolling the dice on next years pick in the return, it’s not going to pitt….and i don’t think that’s likely to happen.
DEFINITELY.....if not then we deserve every thing that happens next season and the seasons that follow if we lose our chance at the McKenna Lottery ! DEFER .Should 100% give up this pick
Highly doubtful. 20 next year also gives you higher potential to reach.20 next year might be better than 12 this year
I dont know why others cant see this. We arent giving it away lolthey're keeping the pick guys. At the very least they'll move it for a now player.
Teams NEVER give up the pick when they're in this situation.
If I was Drury Id contact Pitt to see if any kind of deal can be made. Id look at the options.Drury should trade this years pick, but he won't. He'll trade next years pick.
But they also have high-end talent in Panarin/Fox/Igor on the roster, and will unlikely get a top pick next year without some lotto luck.
At least the time they did win, is a shit time. Nobody close to generational talent. Nobody can even say who is #1. Our pick may end up being better than them, especially if they pick Hagens.Except the Devils, I'd rather see the 1st OA pick go to any other team than the Isles.
If next year's draft is not special outside of McKenna, I guess keep this years pick. We'll know what Drury thinks of his job security if they actually make the pick of course. Certainly wouldnt hurt to add some talent at center or on defense to the pipeline. If they keep next years pick instead they could offer sheet someone but that seems unlikely. The Rangers will very likely be drafting in the 20s next year, despite the naysayers.
Didn't you hear, next year's draft is amazing compared to this year. It always is. "This year is actually really weak, and next year is actually super deep, we'll be able to find impact players into the 2nd round!" every single year.
Also it's ironic that NYR have the 12th pick and everyone is parroting some nonsense that there's a "massive drop-off in talent" after 11. Sure thing, Jan. I can't wait until next year where there will suddenly be a "massive drop-off in talent" after the NYR n-1 pick.