The injury scares me and how do you know how much of him I've seen? I don't remember ever saying that?
I have said the Rossi thing several times this year. Surprised his scoring has translated to the NHL, still see him as a winger. His draft top 5 are all better than him. Super happy we have Lucas Raymond.You didn’t say how much you’ve seen him, but your take makes me believe you haven’t seen much.
I live in Everett and go to Tips games. I’ve seen a lot of him and can tell you this; he’s a pitbull but he’s got brains.
He drives the net like he’s 6’3” 220 when given the chance. He’s also hard in the corners the same way Mazur is. Not a big guy but pound for pound is very strong on the puck.
He manipulates defenders a lot like Jarvis did in Portland. Slow down the D before crossing the blue line then speeding up. Or speeding through the NZ into the offensive zone then curling back to the blue line to make a play to an incoming teammate.
His shot, passing and stick skills are plus level. And he shows these abilities at a high level at speed. And the way he generates his points is more often from the hash marks in. That’s usually an indicator of translatable offense.
The only forward I’ve watched closely this draft with a comparable motor is Eklund, who I think is slightly more skilled, but I have concerns about his size than Bear’s. The kid is a worker.
He’s not super advanced defensively like Benson and Danielson were, but he’s for sure better than what I’ve seen from Misa abd Hagans in that area. Again, see his motor. The kid hustles to get back and help.
The injury worries me, too. It’s a fair concern. I still think his floor is a plus level 3rd liner depending on how his recovery goes and the severity. If the recovery is ok I don’t see why he can’t develop into a very good top 6 or even true top of the lineup winger.
My Ogee sense is tingling when I watch this prospect for the ‘it’ factor. I’ve got a lot more hits than misses when I feel a certain way about a prospect. (Still waiting for @The Zetterberg Era to eat crow about Rossi)
TLDR; He’s realgud and reminds me of a few other prospects I thought were realgud and are now successful top 6 NHLers. Anything from a 20-25g guy to a 70+ point guy. Lots of others in the 10-20 range look to have much less potential than that, in my opinion.
I have said the Rossi thing several times this year. Surprised his scoring has translated to the NHL, still see him as a winger. His draft top 5 are all better than him. Super happy we have Lucas Raymond.
Curious why Minnesota is seemingly shopping him. Isn’t a piece I would accept as a major piece in the thrown around Larkin trade. At least not on a Byfield or Knies level prospect.
Given all he overcame with his health issues it is remarkable where Rossi is. It looks like he is a top 6 player and I certainly had questions there.
Ogee, don't be like that.Bustield and Lafbustiere are not better than Rossi. He’s also better than Quinn, Holtz, Drysdale. He’s probably the 5th best player from that draft. That’s not too bad.
Why Minnesota is shopping him? Probably because Guerin is a moron. The kid is probably the best center they’ve ever had. (Says a lot about that franchise.).
Bustield and Lafbustiere are not better than Rossi. He’s also better than Quinn, Holtz, Drysdale. He’s probably the 5th best player from that draft. That’s not too bad.
Why Minnesota is shopping him? Probably because Guerin is a moron. The kid is probably the best center they’ve ever had. (Says a lot about that franchise.).
If we draft him I hope you're right.You didn’t say how much you’ve seen him, but your take makes me believe you haven’t seen much.
I live in Everett and go to Tips games. I’ve seen a lot of him and can tell you this; he’s a pitbull but he’s got brains.
He drives the net like he’s 6’3” 220 when given the chance. He’s also hard in the corners the same way Mazur is. Not a big guy but pound for pound is very strong on the puck.
He manipulates defenders a lot like Jarvis did in Portland. Slow down the D before crossing the blue line then speeding up. Or speeding through the NZ into the offensive zone then curling back to the blue line to make a play to an incoming teammate.
His shot, passing and stick skills are plus level. And he shows these abilities at a high level at speed. And the way he generates his points is more often from the hash marks in. That’s usually an indicator of translatable offense.
The only forward I’ve watched closely this draft with a comparable motor is Eklund, who I think is slightly more skilled, but I have concerns about his size than Bear’s. The kid is a worker.
He’s not super advanced defensively like Benson and Danielson were, but he’s for sure better than what I’ve seen from Misa abd Hagans in that area. Again, see his motor. The kid hustles to get back and help.
The injury worries me, too. It’s a fair concern. I still think his floor is a plus level 3rd liner depending on how his recovery goes and the severity. If the recovery is ok I don’t see why he can’t develop into a very good top 6 or even true top of the lineup winger.
My Ogee sense is tingling when I watch this prospect for the ‘it’ factor. I’ve got a lot more hits than misses when I feel a certain way about a prospect. (Still waiting for @The Zetterberg Era to eat crow about Rossi)
TLDR; He’s realgud and reminds me of a few other prospects I thought were realgud and are now successful top 6 NHLers. Anything from a 20-25g guy to a 70+ point guy. Lots of others in the 10-20 range look to have much less potential than that, in my opinion.
Misa would be very nice.This is the year we win the lottery!!
Right?
Misa is 100% a center at the NHL level. And I prefer him to Schaffer and Hagens. He'd be a solid John Tavares tier first overall. He'd give us ridiculous depth. I wouldnt mind having to settle for Jake O'BrienHope that Buffalo and Pittsburgh pass the Wings.
Some great players should be available at 7, decent lottery chance aswell.
Given the lottery odds since 2017, they've had roughly a 50% chance of winning 1st overall once. Which is probably the best odds anyone has ever had without winning it. Just give the Wings a win, like once... It's been so long.
Is Misa the consensus pick? And does he project to become a center in the NHL?
Ogee, don't be like that.
They have names.
Misa would be very nice.
Heard that Billysaurus simply does not like Rossi's size at C.Bustield and Lafbustiere are not better than Rossi. He’s also better than Quinn, Holtz, Drysdale. He’s probably the 5th best player from that draft. That’s not too bad.
Why Minnesota is shopping him? Probably because Guerin is a moron. The kid is probably the best center they’ve ever had. (Says a lot about that franchise.).
Schaefer is the consensus pick. And with good reason IMO. While I do not see him getting quite the totals of Makar or Hughes, I see him def as a better defender - significantly better than Hughes. Breakout passes? He excels. PP and PK? He is your man. IQ? Sharp as a razor. Defense prowess? He has it. The total package. I totally understand to be craving for Misa, who would be that C that could push Larkin to 2C within 2-3 yrs, but IMO Schaefer's floor and ceiling are higher. Cannot pass that up.Is Misa the consensus pick? And does he project to become a center in the NHL?
Pittsburgh's been calling up rookies/minor leaguers left and right. They are in full tank mode.Hope that Buffalo and Pittsburgh pass the Wings.
Some great players should be available at 7, decent lottery chance aswell.
Given the lottery odds since 2017, they've had roughly a 50% chance of winning 1st overall once. Which is probably the best odds anyone has ever had without winning it. Just give the Wings a win, like once... It's been so long.
Is Misa the consensus pick? And does he project to become a center in the NHL?
Pittsburgh have fully embraced the tank. Doubt they catch us.Pittsburgh's been calling up rookies/minor leaguers left and right. They are in full tank mode.
We are going to use the hot season to establish this. When you combine the last two years both of your busts have more points than him and contribute far more elements. But cool story.Not if they’re busts!
I just would like to have this problem of which guy to chooseI’d prefer Schaeffer. The kid looked like a superstar before his injury. If the wings drafted Schaeffer I’d put Larkin on the market for 2026 picks (looks like an awesome draft) and look at building this team’s core out of the 2019 to 2026 draftees entirely. Schaeffer could be another Luke Hughes, or he could be up there with Makar and Hughes as a game breaker.
Misa might be a Matt Duchene or Tyler Seguin/Taylor hall level of talent. Top line guy but franchise cornerstone top line? Eh…
The kid didn’t show up well for his team’s postseason when the points weren’t easy. He’s undeniably talented but I get the feeling he’s going to be one of those guys you always want more from.
No shit, talk about problems we don't have...I just would like to have this problem of which guy to choose![]()
Yeah this is pretty much where I am as well. I would love to get Schaefer because that would make our defense an absolutely incredible group. We could have 4 guys that you could argue are the number one guy.I do lean Misa in terms of the debate. But I understand putting together the best top 4 in the league and playing them in front of Cossa/Augustine if the unthinkable lottery win happens.
Our problems with scoring for an entire decade are probably clouding this a bit. I know you draft talent not positional need. I think Misa helps slot our offense into better roles. We have two top pairing youngsters and a really great d prospect on the way.
Yeah this is pretty much where I am as well. I would love to get Schaefer because that would make our defense an absolutely incredible group. We could have 4 guys that you could argue are the number one guy.
But that's a luxury and our future forward core is pretty likely to be fundamentally lacking. If Larkin doesn't age gracefully and/or Kasper/Danielson can't play as 1/2Cs- a fairly likely outcome- we'll have a huge hole down the middle. Misa just slots everyone in the right spot. He takes over as the 1C for Larkin as he ages. Then you only need one of Larkin, Kasper and Danielson to handle 2C minutes (which Kasper has shown he can do and we can assume an aging Larkin could do at least at first). To go along with Raymond, that's likely all of the most important forward spots filled right there.
I would go Schaeffer as well but I would be really happy landing Misa. I definitely wouldn't be using 4 playoff games to judge anything about him as a player. He lit up the Hlinka as a younger guy. But those 4 games don't mean anything when you're looking at his 62 goals in 65 games as a draft eligible. Its not even worth discussing.I’d prefer Schaeffer. The kid looked like a superstar before his injury. If the wings drafted Schaeffer I’d put Larkin on the market for 2026 picks (looks like an awesome draft) and look at building this team’s core out of the 2019 to 2026 draftees entirely. Schaeffer could be another Luke Hughes, or he could be up there with Makar and Hughes as a game breaker.
Misa might be a Matt Duchene or Tyler Seguin/Taylor hall level of talent. Top line guy but franchise cornerstone top line? Eh…
The kid didn’t show up well for his team’s postseason when the points weren’t easy. He’s undeniably talented but I get the feeling he’s going to be one of those guys you always want more from.
I think the wings scoring would be helped a tonne by a guy like Schaeffer though. Having Petry and Chiarot types out of the top 4 completely makes the breakout and offensive play on the blue line look a lot different. A guy like Schaeffer helps that while also making the team better defensively.I do lean Misa in terms of the debate. But I understand putting together the best top 4 in the league and playing them in front of Cossa/Augustine if the unthinkable lottery win happens.
Our problems with scoring for an entire decade are probably clouding this a bit. I know you draft talent not positional need. I think Misa helps slot our offense into better roles. We have two top pairing youngsters and a really great d prospect on the way.
I get it. Schaeffer is going 1st overall for a reason. I'd be thrilled to have him. I just think that Misa is equally talented and at a position where we really need the help.The team’s scoring would take a big jump in general if we had defensemen that could actually play the puck.
Look at the top 4 defense of the top 10 scoring teams in the NHL. The only team with a weak top 4 is Toronto.
If by some stroke of luck we get Schaeffer that’s a real needle mover. More goals for, fewer goals against.