quietbruinfan
Salt and light
True-at least more than likely.Could happen but he'll be playing center in the NHL.
True-at least more than likely.Could happen but he'll be playing center in the NHL.
Probably would beYou’ve been banging the Eklund drum & think you’re spot on. Kid can become an elite scoring winger which this team desperately needs. Lindholm Zacha are responsible enough centers where you can take swings at the wing.
Going along with your theme:
2026-27
Geekie Lindholm Pastrnak
Eklund Zacha Necas
Yup 4-6 he’s going to be the guyMartin has a good chance of going before 7.
No I won’t. I know he is 6’ tall.When the fanbase realizes he’s only 6 foot even they’ll flip on him.
Clutterbuck, Hathaway, Jost… none of these guys produced in the best junior league in the world their draft year.I've seen a bunch of comparisons on here of Martin to Cal Clutterbuck but Clutterbuck had 34 points at 17, while Martin had 72. Clutterbuck's only great season in the O was when he rode shotgun with Tavares who scored 72 goals that year. I don't watch the OHL near as much now as when Clutterbuck played but from what I've seen, read and heard Martin is far more talented. Martin could end up like Clutterbuck in the NHL but he's a way better prospect.
I don't know if this is you, but I think a lot of folks are 'afraid' of Martin because they think people are being duped by the fact he's the most physical player in the draft and that's all they can see.
Even if you completely remove the physical game from the equation, he still scored similar to Desnoyer and Martone at even strength (and 10 points more than O'Brien in 9 fewer games). He is a good passer, a good shooter, and has good puck skills. He ranks 12th in the draft in points among draft eligibles and almost all of the guys ahead of him have more games played. My point being that it would seem he has top6 upside based on scoring ability alone, no?
He's also young. He's eligible for 2 more WJC's. Martone and Bear, those guys age out this year. I personally prefer the younger guys because I think they have more room to grow/upside.
I do agree with you that the Bruins need a talented center. Number 1 centers are rare and if we don't get one now, then when? But a lot of "experts" have said that after Misa there are no other #1 centers in this draft... I don't know if that's true, but the other thing that's extremely rare in this league, is that throwback top6 power forward. Those guys are impossible to acquire in their prime.
This draft argument is being framed as a choice between a 1st line center vs a 3rd line hitter, but what if the reality is more like a good but non-descript 2nd line center vs a tone setting 2nd line center that everyone in the league will covet?
Again, I have absolutely no idea if that's the case, I'm just trying to see things from as many angles as possible.
Hey everyone has dreams. One of mine is they don’t take two of the three least skilled top 15 prospects on the board, and look for top tier offensive ability.No I won’t. I know he is 6’ tall.
My dream is they draft him. Trade zacha for a first and draft Aitcheson with it.
Martin is 6' tall at 17. He'll probably top out at 6'1, same height as JT Miller and Sam Bennett.No I won’t. I know he is 6’ tall.
My dream is they draft him. Trade zacha for a first and draft Aitcheson with it.
Clutterbuck, Hathaway, Jost… none of these guys produced in the best junior league in the world their draft year.
Martin is 6' tall at 17. He'll probably top out at 6'1, same height as JT Miller and Sam Bennett.
If Martin can find an inch and 35 pounds, why can’t Hagens be 6’0 195?Can he get to 215?
He was 18 during his draft year not 17 like Martin is. He had 34 points as a 17 year old.Clutterbuck had 35 goals 33 assists in his draft year in the OHL . Jost did not play in the CHL, but he terrorized whatever league he was in (BCHL) with 104 pts, in 48 games in his draft year
He probably will reach that.If Martin can find an inch and 35 pounds, why can’t Hagens be 6’0 195?
He was 18 during his draft year not 17 like Martin is. He had 34 points as a 17 year old.
And it was still his 3rd year in the OHL while this was Martin's 2nd. That's comparing apples to oranges. Clutterbuck grew up playing hockey with and against players born the same year as him regardless of whether they were born in January or December.He was 4 months older in his draft year, so he turned 18 in November of the year he was drafted, while Martin turned 18 in March
Of course. Why, do people think Hagens is too small at 5'11? That seems like a weird case to make. Brayden Point is 5'11.If Martin can find an inch and 35 pounds, why can’t Hagens be 6’0 195?
They don’t say he’s too small. They say they have “concerns about his size”.Of course. Why, do people think Hagens is too small at 5'11? That seems like a weird case to make. Brayden Point is 5'11.
I used to prefer bigger centers, but with more teams switching to man to man it's getting less and less important.They don’t say he’s too small. They say they have “concerns about his size”.
I’m betting Martin goes later. Like 8-10. There are holes in his game. I did watch a lot of shift by shift videos of his games. I watched either 3 or 4 and he threw one hit. So he may be a rise to the occasion type player, but that’s one thing I noticed after all the hype over his physicality and highlights. He does motor though and keeps his feet moving at all times, but he is also not a graceful skater at all and he tends to do his own thing instead of being part of the flow of a team’s system. He does have some nice hands and definitely heady. I was surprised by that as I was expecting more north south no nonsense hockey. Bennett type player is something I think he could achieve and if you think it’s worth a high draft pick on I wouldn’t say you are wrong just you prioritize something different in a player.Yup 4-6 he’s going to be the guy
Yeah I think that would, Poitras is probably unnecessary.Would 7OA + Poitras/Toronto 1st get you 4OA from Utah?
I'd do that and grab Frondell/Desnoyers as fast as I couldYeah I think that would, Poitras is probably unnecessary.