- Mar 21, 2006
- 13,418
- 12,085
I agree that the choice could have been made in either direction regarding Samo and Vilmanis.I think they will get their chances soon enough too... I just think they deserved a spot on the opening-night roster due to their play lately.
I'd argue that Vilmanis as showed as much potential as Mackie lately, and yes he did it against juniors but his end of the season was as good or better than Samo's !
But I get it... You all love Samo and everything is fine.
Personaly, I don't find it fair to see a guy who participated in like 4 days out of 16 or 18, get a spot ahead of someone who did everything you asked out of him without missing a days...
But it is probably just me, as I seem to be quite alone with that thought.
You could have rewarded Vilmanis for two weeks, and then send him back after his obvious rookie slump, bring Mackie up after he showed his domination in the first few games of the A season... It would have been better management IMO.
Nonetheless, I expect Samo to have a short leash, if he doesn’t produce, then it’s Vilmanis’ turn.
I don’t really know as a fan which way is better. I want the best team on ice, I don’t have a special attachment to either of these two players. This is a bit like, do you shoot first in the shootout? If you do (like giving Samo the first spot) and you score, you’ve got the upper hand. If you miss, the next guy has the upper hand.
A couple of moths later, could be either of these two who sticks, or maybe neither. I’m in a wait and see state of mind.