Romang67
BitterSwede
I suppose so, but it also means another player will not be kept on the roster. And unlike all other players, a 3rd string QB is likely the only one that doesn't see the field from time to time while on the roster.I suppose it makes sense from the perspective of it kind of forces the teams to keep a guy on the roster instead of bouncing him back and forth
I don't know, it just strikes me as a weird thing to veto from the NFLPA. I assume they have their reasons.
It will make cuts more interesting.