Transfer: 2024 Summer Transfer Window - Open Window Discussion

robertmac43

Forever 43!
Mar 31, 2015
24,994
17,198
I don’t want it because David is not that good and will cost a lot
David probably isn't the big splash you would want to make as Chelsea. But he is extremely efficient and a great complimentary player. I think with the right fit he can be extremely effective at a higher level.
 

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
52,909
16,347
7 goals in 11 appearances for a midfielder seems really good?
5th in goals/90. The response to this is simply unhinged. Outproduced Deivid Washington, but people want to pretend that he'd a no name with no potential and other similar prospects don't go for similar money.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Blender

Blender

Registered User
Dec 2, 2009
52,618
46,364
He’s a forward. Was moved around a bit across the front line but definitely an attacking third player here
He mostly played as an attacking midfielder or on the wing, not as a striker.

5th in goals/90. The response to this is simply unhinged. Outproduced Deivid Washington, but people want to pretend that he'd a no name with no potential and other similar prospects don't go for similar money.
There's been huge cost inflation in prospects over the last 4-5 years.
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,328
11,451
He mostly played as an attacking midfielder or on the wing, not as a striker.
He’s an attacking third player. He’s not a #8 so I would say that he has an impressive PL2 goal haul for a midfield when he isn’t primarily played in the midfield. It’s still not bad but again it’s not like Chelsea signed him because of his PL2 credentials either
 

bleedblue1223

Registered User
Jan 21, 2011
52,909
16,347
Two things can be true, we selected him in part for an accounting move, and that his price is fair for the potential that he has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blender

ItsFineImFine

Registered User
Aug 11, 2019
3,722
2,383
I'm sure he's a very good prospect but I'm tired of us wasting what must be 100M+++ now on prospects rather than just spending that money on a striker, an LB since Chilwell's f***ed, etc.

Like it's good to have some youth players with high end potential but they've just gone off the deep end on this at the cost of improving the actual first team with good experienced players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gary69 and Blender

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,328
11,451
Two things can be true, we selected him in part for an accounting move, and that his price is fair for the potential that he has.
If Kellyman is worth 20m based on potential, you are basically just saying anyone decent at PL2 level is worth 20m. This is not a truth.

You know last yeah and a half I was tarred and feathered for saying Chelsea was intentionally ruining market values and especially if we want to consider Kellyman being worth 20m as a truth, this is just more evidence of that. There is literally no one else besides Chelsea doing this. The only two comparisons from this are also Chelsea doing the same thing.

There is nothing that you can quantify this transfer with, keeping a straight face, that says Kellyman is a 20m player. It’s price fixing to cheat PSR rules, and it’s being facilitated by two teams that failed it. This isn’t rocket science
I'm sure he's a very good prospect but I'm tired of us wasting what must be 100M+++ now on prospects rather than just spending that money on a striker, an LB since Chilwell's f***ed, etc.

Like it's good to have some youth players with high end potential but they've just gone off the deep end on this at the cost of improving the actual first team with good experienced players.
Yeah but you can’t manipulate the price tags on those senior players to make the PSR numbers work
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Blender and luiginb

Blender

Registered User
Dec 2, 2009
52,618
46,364
He’s an attacking third player. He’s not a #8 so I would say that he has an impressive PL2 goal haul for a midfield when he isn’t primarily played in the midfield. It’s still not bad but again it’s not like Chelsea signed him because of his PL2 credentials either
His goal scoring rate in PL2 at his age is impressive for a #10. Feel free to go look that up, as you easily can.
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,328
11,451
His goal scoring rate in PL2 at his age is impressive for a #10. Feel free to go look that up, as you easily can.
You might be more easily impressed than me. There are plenty that put up goals at PL2 level and don’t even settle in the Championship. No one plays defense in PL2
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,328
11,451
Your ability to move a conversation into ridiculous hyperbole is impressive.
How is this hyperbole? This is what happened. This is clear as day price fixing. This is The same the Arthur/Pjanjc transfer that Juve got sanctioned for. There is nothing inaccurate in this post
 

Blender

Registered User
Dec 2, 2009
52,618
46,364
You might be more easily impressed than me. There are plenty that put up goals at PL2 level and don’t even settle in the Championship. No one plays defense in PL2
The highest scoring U19 player in PL2 last season had 15 goals in 16 appearances. The highest scoring U19 attacking midfielders had 10 goals in 13 appearances and 10 goals in 18 appearances.

7 goals in 11 appearances is near the top of the league for his age cohort and position.

How is this hyperbole? This is what happened. This is clear as day price fixing. This is The same the Arthur/Pjanjc transfer that Juve got sanctioned for. There is nothing inaccurate in this post
"anyone decent at PL2 level is worth 20m" is absurd hyperbole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluesfan94

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,328
11,451
The highest scoring U19 player in PL2 last season had 15 goals in 16 appearances. The highest scoring U19 attacking midfielders had 10 goals in 13 appearances and 10 goals in 18 appearances.

7 goals in 11 appearances is near the top of the league for his age cohort and position.
And again no one defends in that league.
"anyone decent at PL2 level is worth 20m" is absurd hyperbole.
it is not hyperbole when the argument is “20m based on potential” when no one on the planet not associated with Chelsea or Aston Villa would have valued this player at 20m. If a player like Kellyman is worth 20m all of a sudden, then the market is now PL2 players are worth 20m whether their CV justifies it or not.
 

Blender

Registered User
Dec 2, 2009
52,618
46,364
And again no one defends in that league.
This is in no way a valid response to the relative scoring rates of players in the same league at the same ages.
it is not hyperbole when the argument is “20m based on potential” when no one on the planet not associated with Chelsea or Aston Villa would have valued this player at 20m
There are players in the 20s and 30s in the PL2 and plenty of mediocre and weak prospects. Your claim that because one is going for 20m that means anyone in the league could be worth that is nonsensical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluesfan94

JPBolts

Registered User
Jun 21, 2019
1,241
364
I noticed there was a line that Chelsea had enquired about Kellyman in January.

Also Thiago Almada might be the Crystal Palace Olise replacement
if that happens, I'd be very interested in Palace this upcoming season. They look real good and a summer to work with Glasner.
 

Savant

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 3, 2013
38,328
11,451
This is in no way a valid response to the relative scoring rates of players in the same league at the same ages.

There are players in the 20s and 30s in the PL2 and plenty of mediocre and weak prospects. Your claim that because one is going for 20m that means anyone in the league could be worth that is nonsensical.
It’s not nonsensical though. It’s either the market is being redefined by Chelsea, again, as we speak or the new expectation is youth players are either all PSR pawns and/or worth 20m based on potential. That’s the nonsense part of this.

How about this. You find me something that was written in May 2024 or earlier that said Kellyman is worth 20m for a transfer this window and then we can talk about hyperbole.

I noticed there was a line that Chelsea had enquired about Kellyman in January.
Riiiiiiiiiiight.

And I’m sure he was also worth 20m then
 

Blender

Registered User
Dec 2, 2009
52,618
46,364
It’s not nonsensical though. It’s either the market is being redefined by Chelsea, again, as we speak or the new expectation is youth players are either all PSR pawns and/or worth 20m based on potential. That’s the nonsense part of this.

How about this. You find me something that was written in May 2024 or earlier that said Kellyman is worth 20m for a transfer this window and then we can talk about hyperbole.
You are continuing to ignore what you actually said, that anyone in the PL2 could be worth that. You're not even responding to what I am saying, so there is little point in continuing this conversation. I didn't say "Kellyman is worth 20m" as I think that fee is inflated. That doesn't mean he isn't a good prospect and hasn't performed well in the PL2, both those things are also true.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad