Blue Jays Discussion: 2024 Season - Complete without a great title in keeping with the performance

hockeywiz542

Registered User
May 26, 2008
16,179
5,247

Blue Jays' Off-Season Wish List

Speaking at the MLB general managers meeting, Atkins pointed to relief pitching as a top priority for the team to upgrade this winter.

"We want to improve our pitching, improve our offence (and) build upon a team that we feel is a good one, is in a good starting position," Atkins said. "We need to improve our bullpen. That is the clear area of opportunity for us, but really excited about the energy here and our opportunity to get better."

Atkins also told Jordan Bastian of MLB Network on Tuesday that the Blue Jays are not looking to add a catcher this off-season, with their focus elsewhere.


Toronto traded catcher Danny Jansen this season, but still have Alejandro Kirk, Taylor Heineman and Nick Raposo on their 40-man roster.

Atkins also noted that Gold Glove centrefielder Daulton Varsho may not be ready for Opening Day after undergoing shoulder surgery and declined to comment on the team's potential pursuit of New York Yankees slugger Juan Soto as he hits free agency this winter.
 

TheTotalPackage

Registered User
Sep 14, 2006
7,623
5,968
Makes sense.

Go into the season expecting a bounceback/return to the playoffs.

If that doesn't work out and you're legitimately out of the picture by after the all-star break, then you probably reconsider heading into the deadline.

Nothing wrong with that.
True. Only problem being is that you are either selling an already depressed asset at a fraction of what he should be able to get if he has another poor year, or you still are likely to sell low even if he has a bounceback year based on the fact that each passing day he is one day closer to free agency.

All this being said, I'd rather prioritize re-signing him and Vladdy this offseason and building the team into the future around them as has been the intention all along.
 

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
11,243
6,598

I'm comfortable with Clement and Wagner at 3rd and 2nd.
Yeah, I think OF is the best fit.

Clement looked really good last year, but I don't hate the idea of adding a 3B and having Clement fill in everywhere as a super-utility guy. We always talk about having that player, but they've always been either mediocre defenders who can't play SS or useless with the bat. As a fantastic defender with a close-to-league-average bat, Clement is perfect for a utility role.
 

tmlfan98

No More Excuses #MarnerOut
Aug 13, 2012
2,379
1,345
Hockey's Mecca
Yeah, I think OF is the best fit.

Clement looked really good last year, but I don't hate the idea of adding a 3B and having Clement fill in everywhere as a super-utility guy. We always talk about having that player, but they've always been either mediocre defenders who can't play SS or useless with the bat. As a fantastic defender with a close-to-league-average bat, Clement is perfect for a utility role.
I don't think there's going to be enough in the budget to add a starting 3B upgrade on Clement.

The top priorities for the FO seem to be a starting LF, and a SP (this is a priority for them because they would upgrade the rotation and pen at the same time with YRod getting bumped down to a swingman role).

Considering they could only have $40M total to spend, and they still have to fill out the rest of the pen, getting a 3B who's better than Clement on top of that seems unlikely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hockeywiz542

Bjindaho

Registered User
Jun 12, 2006
7,229
1,924
Imo, we pursue Soto heavily with Alonso as a fallback plan offensively. Plan C should be trade.

If Sasaki is posted, Toronto needs to be bidding to win. He's a top of the rotation starter and young.

If you can't get Sasaki, I think trade is the best option.

The bullpen needs arms via multiple avenues. If Romano is kept, they need at least one more BP signing for the back end. They should trade for someone about to price a current club out or two then scrounge.
 

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
44,530
20,720
Toronto, ON
They keep talking about wanting to contend in 2025, but then only have 20-25M to spend. Huh? I just don’t understand with this team and ownership group. It all sucks, quite frankly.
 

tmlfan98

No More Excuses #MarnerOut
Aug 13, 2012
2,379
1,345
Hockey's Mecca
They keep talking about wanting to contend in 2025, but then only have 20-25M to spend. Huh? I just don’t understand with this team and ownership group. It all sucks, quite frankly.
The $25M number is coming from Shi Davidi, who IMO made a bad guess here. He conservatively guessed using Fangraphs payroll estimates, that the Jays opening day CBT payroll will be $235M because Shapiro said payroll isn't changing much, and the Jays ended 2024 with a $235M CBT payroll.

But in reality, the last 2 seasons in a row the Jays have had an opening day CBT payroll of $250M. Safer guess would probably be that they have $40M to spend, and will once again have an opening day CBT payroll of $250M for a 3rd straight season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suntouchable13

Suntouchable13

Registered User
Dec 20, 2003
44,530
20,720
Toronto, ON
The $25M number is coming from Shi Davidi, who IMO made a bad guess here. He conservatively guessed using Fangraphs payroll estimates, that the Jays opening day CBT payroll will be $235M because Shapiro said payroll isn't changing much, and the Jays ended 2024 with a $235M CBT payroll.

But in reality, the last 2 seasons in a row the Jays have had an opening day CBT payroll of $250M. Safer guess would probably be that they have $40M to spend, and will once again have an opening day CBT payroll of $250M for a 3rd straight season.

Thanks. The path forward is to spend in order to improve. There are not a ton of trade chips. So the 20-25M numbers being reported do not make sense. So I hope you're right.
 

Bjindaho

Registered User
Jun 12, 2006
7,229
1,924
Thanks. The path forward is to spend in order to improve. There are not a ton of trade chips. So the 20-25M numbers being reported do not make sense. So I hope you're right.
There are ways to make it to contender.

The biggest issue IMO is the front office.

Owen Caissie is reportedly going to be made available by CHC because of lack of path to playing time. He'd be an excellent target.

There are always bullpen arms that can be had for very little.

The question comes down to identifying and executing.
 

tmlfan98

No More Excuses #MarnerOut
Aug 13, 2012
2,379
1,345
Hockey's Mecca
Thanks. The path forward is to spend in order to improve. There are not a ton of trade chips. So the 20-25M numbers being reported do not make sense. So I hope you're right.
It's literally not even a report, it's just speculation from Shi Davidi. He even admitted as much and also acknowledged that it could be based on "opening day" and not "year end" like I said:


Based on the Jays spending patterns the last 2 seasons while they've been a tax paying club, a $250M opening day CBT payroll for the 3rd straight season is a way safer guess than a $235M opening day CBT payroll based on the Jays' 2024 year end payroll

Year end payroll was only that low because they wanted to duck the tax at the deadline and re-set their CBT penalties heading into next season. The Jays are now a 1st year tax paying club again instead of a 3rd year repeater which is what they would have been.

I almost wonder if Shi put out that overly conservative estimate on purpose to try and make the FO look good when they inevitably end up spending more than $25M.
 
Last edited:

Discoverer

Registered User
Apr 11, 2012
11,243
6,598
It's literally not even a report, it's just speculation from Shi Davidi. He even admitted as much and also acknowledged that it could be based on "opening day" and not "year end" like I said:


Based on the Jays spending patterns the last 2 seasons while they've been a tax paying club, a $250M opening day CBT payroll for the 3rd straight season is a way safer guess than a $235M opening day CBT payroll based on the Jays' 2024 year end payroll

Year end payroll was only that low because they wanted to duck the tax at the deadline and re-set their CBT penalties heading into next season. The Jays are now a 1st year tax paying club again instead of a 3rd year repeater which is what they would have been.

I almost wonder if Shi put out that overly conservative estimate on purpose to try and make the FO look good when they inevitably end up spending more than $25M.
I remember Davidi reporting in late October/early November, 2012, that the Jays payroll for 2013 would increase to somewhere in the $90-100 million range. Within two weeks, they blew past that number with the Marlins trade and ended up closer to $130 million.

That's not to suggest the same thing is happening here at all - I just don't think any reporter really knows what it's going to be.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad