Blake Corum is a fantastic college RB behind a great oline. If that's the strength of your team, there's no point just airing it out. He wasn't throwing to the receivers Burrow/Mac had in college.Flip side of that is if he were Joe Burrow they would've thrown the ball more. Im good with taking another bite at the "national championship winning game manager" apple.
It's not like Michigan had a cant miss Top 5 pick RB they had to feed the ball to
Local sports talk scuttlebutt last week suggested the 11th, MIN 2025 1st & Justin Jefferson for the 3rd overall. Seems too hefty to me.Bowers is the best tight end prospect in years, I don’t have a problem with that if they end up dealing for a guy like Fields or going with a veteran
What I do wanna know is what did they propose the Vikings give up to move to 3? Because the haul would have to be immense
IF (and that's a big IF) that offer is legit, you have to give it some consideration. You're only getting Jefferson for 1yr though, but if you think you can sign him to a long-term deal, I'd probably do it.Local sports talk scuttlebutt last week suggested the 11th, MIN 2025 1st & Justin Jefferson for the 3rd overall. Seems too hefty to me.
If Pats aren’t sold on the the QB’s and decide to go Justin Fields wouldn’t the smart play be snag MHJ? I don’t know much about Bowers but I think the WR is the more pressing need. Jefferson is great but $$$$$
I would do that so fast as a pats fan, Jefferson is a guy you happily pay big money toLocal sports talk scuttlebutt last week suggested the 11th, MIN 2025 1st & Justin Jefferson for the 3rd overall. Seems too hefty to me.
If Pats aren’t sold on the the QB’s and decide to go Justin Fields wouldn’t the smart play be snag MHJ? I don’t know much about Bowers but I think the WR is the more pressing need. Jefferson is great but $$$$$
Absolutely.I would do that so fast as a pats fan, Jefferson is a guy you happily pay big money to
Van Pelt: “You know, I think running the football in this league wins games, wins championships. Being able to do that late into the season.”
Nope. Not at all. It's 2024, how are guys still saying this?
People are reading too much into the Van Pelt quote but being able to run the ball is important and i think it does get more important later into the season when you're a team like the Patriots who are more likely to play in winter conditions the deeper into the season they get.Van Pelt: “You know, I think running the football in this league wins games, wins championships. Being able to do that late into the season.”
Nope. Not at all. It's 2024, how are guys still saying this?
People are reading too much into the Van Pelt quote but being able to run the ball is important and i think it does get more important later into the season when you're a team like the Patriots who are more likely to play in winter conditions the deeper into the season they get.
I'm not worried about Van Pelt trying to run an old school run heavy offense though. Joe Flacco was throwing the ball on average 40 times per game when he got to the Browns this season and i expect the Patriots offense will be similar to Kevin Stefanski's.
Van Pelt: “You know, I think running the football in this league wins games, wins championships. Being able to do that late into the season.”
Nope. Not at all. It's 2024, how are guys still saying this?
Pacheco helped turn KC around, the running game definitely helps win games, it sets up play action or the option. It keeps linebackers in the box to open up TE and slot WRs.
Look at what happened to Baltimore when they went away from what brought them success (running game) and they tried throwing it to beat Mahomes ...
I don't think Van Pelt is suggesting bringing back the Wing T or the veer offense and run the ball 40 times a game, he's talking about complimentary football.
KC was 20th and 19th overall in rushing the past two seasons. Rams 25th in 2021. Tampa 28th in 2020.Van Pelt: “You know, I think running the football in this league wins games, wins championships. Being able to do that late into the season.”
Nope. Not at all. It's 2024, how are guys still saying this?
He flat out said running wins games and wins championships...he didn't say you need to run to compliment the pass. If running wins titles, you would see everyone trying to get the best players at that position.Pacheco helped turn KC around, the running game definitely helps win games, it sets up play action or the option. It keeps linebackers in the box to open up TE and slot WRs.
Look at what happened to Baltimore when they went away from what brought them success (running game) and they tried throwing it to beat Mahomes ...
I don't think Van Pelt is suggesting bringing back the Wing T or the veer offense and run the ball 40 times a game, he's talking about complimentary football.