Schemp
Registered User
The 1st one that gets injured, otherwise just rotate and then it depends on matchups.So we have Cooley, Bjugstad, Hayton, McBain and Stenlund as centers....who is the odd man out...they can't all play?
The 1st one that gets injured, otherwise just rotate and then it depends on matchups.So we have Cooley, Bjugstad, Hayton, McBain and Stenlund as centers....who is the odd man out...they can't all play?
With Boyd they had 5 centers last year and had long stretches without him and Hayton. Good to have injury solutions, and if all are healthy, good to have competition.The 1st one that gets injured, otherwise just rotate and then it depends on matchups.
No. Cooley is way too good of a playmaker to play wing. As long as he remains defensively sound he should play C.Cooley on wing?
Without LTIRing Weber.
Expect that meme to make a few appearances during the season….The Sudbury Blueberry Bulldogs have Jim's...Utah has Kevin's.
Depending on how it goes, I might just have to get a Bulldogs jersey with Stenlund across the back. To honor the Jims.The Sudbury Blueberry Bulldogs have Jim's...Utah has Kevin's.
The Stenlund and Cole signings are not impressive.Maybe it’s just me and I’m bitter about the move, but I’m not impressed by any of the signings so far.
I heard him say somewhere he BA wants short term to allow prospects a shot?Stenlund 2X2M. I wouldn't have minded a little more term.
Cooley is terrible at FO's. Once the puck is in play he can take the C position. McBain I think could be shifted to wing.No. Cooley is way too good of a playmaker to play wing. As long as he remains defensively sound he should play C.
Stenlund is great on the PK and at FO's.The Stenlund and Cole signings are not impressive.
It's the restraint from going bigger than is impressive.
The 1st one that gets injured, otherwise just rotate and then it depends on matchups.
Cooley is terrible at FO's. Once the puck is in play he can take the C position. McBain I think could be shifted to wing.
Stenlund is great on the PK and at FO's.
J O S H D O A NKeller-Hayton-Schmaltz
Bjugstad-Cooley-Guenther
Crouse-McBain-Maccelli
Kerfoot-Stenberg-Carcone
(I feel like I'm missing someone)
That's fair - there's always the opportunity to re-up Stenlund if things are rolling along tickity boo. Or move along to another option if thats the better way to go.I heard him say somewhere he BA wants short term to allow prospects a shot?
WHY?Trade Carcone for futures and start Doan on 3rd or 4th line RW.
Doan needs to be a daily player. He won’t grow sitting in the press box.WHY?
I guess we will find out this year.Keep Cooley at centre. He can improve at faceoffs.
I keep Carcone for depth.Trade Carcone for futures and start Doan on 3rd or 4th line RW.
That's for Bear to figure out.This. Can't have enough centers. Kerfoot wasn't ba as a fill in when injuries hit but we were still short centers down the line up. Essentially our entire 4th line can play C and each one brings a different element than us suited for different lines.
Who would you want as that winger/C pivot with Cooley though? Putting McBain or Kerfoot up there to take faceoffs feels like a waste of Cooley's talent. Bjudstadt may be a fit though.
Keller-Hayton-Schmaltz
Bjugstad-Cooley-Guenther
Crouse-McBain-Maccelli
Kerfoot-Stenberg-Carcone
(I feel like I'm missing someone)
They are both cheap, short term contracts.The Stenlund and Cole signings are not impressive.
It's the restraint from going bigger than is impressive.
But why trade Carconne?Doan needs to be a daily player. He won’t grow sitting in the press box.