Tavares to Utah??
That be a shock that Utah be interested in Tavares.
Tavares to Utah??
Yup...it is a...Marke says: somebody speculated this based on nothing and I wonder if you think it’s conceivable Elliotte? And then Elliotte says: No
He’s shooting his shot. The D depth chart is trash. He’s probably angling for a much higher AHL wage and a Euro contract out-clause. This may be the last time in his hockey career he ever has any semblance of leverage. I’m proud of our boy.Koly is tricky. Hasn't really earned a one-way deal. He may just be one of those guys who ultimately gets his spot eaten up by depth.
1 - He wont waive to go to a non playoff team.That be a shock that Utah be interested in Tavares.
1 - Probably not1 - He wont waive to go to a non playoff team.
2 - It would be dumb to give assets for him
3 - It would be even dumber to sign him to an extension.
I’m pretty indifferent about that. I’m not adding to schmaltz, though. 1:1 is fine.Schmaltz for Laine?
I think he gets a 1-way minimum/prove it contract.Koly is tricky. Hasn't really earned a one-way deal. He may just be one of those guys who ultimately gets his spot eaten up by depth.
Trouba has 2 years at $8 million Cap hit. If he's on the market not only will there be no retention the Rangers will be getting assets back in a trade. He's a legit number 1 D on a reasonable contract. You fellas are delusional
3 Dmen and a 1c who can win faceoffs is my wish list.
That's a curious take alright.
Anyway, speaking of curiosity, I was wondering what the moves for Utah would be this offseason. Seems like the consensus is that the forward group is solid/deep and if anyone can take a step they have the opportunity to do so but we can expect money poured on the backend? Sounds like a fun time to be a fan, shed some second rounders and acquire some guys. Reminds me of when the Isles got Boychuk and Leddy, what a day that was! They ended up being our top pairing.
Keller-Hayton-DoanI feel like Maccelli and Laine would be great linemates. So that might force Doan onto Keller's line.
I think he would be an excellent player for a year or 2 (or 3). It is the cost of acquisition (would need to be a cap dump) and the cost of year 2 and 3.1 - Probably not
2 - Definitely. Toronto should give to dump his $11m.
3 - Dude is coming off a 65 point season, wins 58% of his draws and is a decent vet. He would not be terrible to have around for a year or 3 if it was a more reasonable NHL type contract rather than a Toronto sized one.
“We had seven 20 goal scorers so we’re gonna be good up front, we’ve gotta add some D-men and kinda tinker with that. And see what we get at the draft and with a few trades and we’ll see how that goes.”
Sound like he’s not looking to make major changes or upgrades to the forward group. Seems quite focused on the blueline.
Why does everyone here keep on putting Hayton as the #1C? As far as I'm concerned he lost that job last year and has to earn it back with his play. Hayton can't handle the pressure and talent of other team 1st. lines. I would rather keep Schmaltz than have Laine. Hell, Laine would probably have withdrawal symptoms and and go on LTIR. Do not want Laine, he isn't the type of character I want on my team.Keller-Hayton-Doan
Maccelli-Bjuggy-Laine
Crouse-Cooley-Guenther
Carcone-McBain-Kerfoot
Not bad.