Andre Palot
Registered User
I am not a fan of this pick. I don't care how you wanna sugarcoat it. This screams like Muk 2.0, a reach pick when there were better consensus options. Pissed off right now.
Muk worked out for us in the end
I am not a fan of this pick. I don't care how you wanna sugarcoat it. This screams like Muk 2.0, a reach pick when there were better consensus options. Pissed off right now.
Because he didn't fit our own well researched and scouted personal draft lists.If Bob MacKenzie had this kid 3rd and we took him at 10, how do you complain about that?
Muk wasn't a bad pick either, did we need get Meier w him, and is he not a good prospect?I am not a fan of this pick. I don't care how you wanna sugarcoat it. This screams like Muk 2.0, a reach pick when there were better consensus options. Pissed off right now.
I totally agree that getting a guy slated for the top of the draft at 10 is objectively a good thing, but the three-year window for contribution is a legit thing to complain about when we're trying to compete now.
I am not a fan of this pick. I don't care how you wanna sugarcoat it. This screams like Muk 2.0, a reach pick when there were better consensus options. Pissed off right now.
He was the consensus option on many lists, ranked higher than the Devils pick.I am not a fan of this pick. I don't care how you wanna sugarcoat it. This screams like Muk 2.0, a reach pick when there were better consensus options. Pissed off right now.
You can dislike the pick but not a reach by any definitionI am not a fan of this pick. I don't care how you wanna sugarcoat it. This screams like Muk 2.0, a reach pick when there were better consensus options. Pissed off right now.
Might be the top pick of the draft? Don’t they know he was obviously over drafted at 10?
I don't get how anyone is really upset with the pick. If they had picked a guy like Boisvert at 10, be upset. But Silayev had a number of evaluators with him inside the top 5.
Yeah but have you considered that some people online are angry
Celebrini is the only player from this class likely to play in the NHL next season. After that you're only talking about a handful of players that are likely going to play in the NHL in their D+2 season and most of those players aren't going to be impact players. Silaev has a chance to be a dominant shut down defenseman, you should be able to wait an extra year for that type of player.I totally agree that getting a guy slated for the top of the draft at 10 is objectively a good thing, but the three-year window for contribution is a legit thing to complain about when we're trying to compete now.