- Feb 26, 2016
- 17,161
- 28,721
Draft would’ve been more exciting with more darts to throw but overall seems like we made some solid picks
Our D cupboard is sparse so hey let's use all of our midnround picks on forwards that may some day be waiver fodder
Which pick are you most giddy about?Really liking our draft so far. We got a lot of solid pieces with some upside.
Especially in the mid/late rounds IMHOTake BPA always. You never know what the future holds.
BPA is nonexistent beyond a handful of players... especially not a reality outside of the top 10-15Take BPA always. You never know what the future holds.
Which pick are you most giddy about?
BPA is nonexistent beyond a handful of players... especially not a reality outside of the top 10-15
I'm saying our version of BPA needs adjustment
This only exists on hfboards when someone wants to start a straw man.Especially in the mid/late rounds IMHO
Although, I wonder what would happen if you just went into a draft saying "I'm picking defensemen this year". You'd always get the best one available at the spot you're picking, and often you'd get someone who was a faller for some reason
Then next year centres, etc
Kinda like that year when Mike Smith said him only picking Russians this year" lol
That's my point - our list has been flawed since hillier took overEvery team has a list, stick to your list. Don't deviate for positional neneed.
Watching YouTube is easier and cheaper than hiring a scouting staff I guessThe Scouching Report seems to have the ear of the Jets as well.
He had these Jets pucks ranked really high.
Kevin He at #79
Freij at #11
Kieran Walton at #49.
That's my point - our list has been flawed since hillier took over
Watching YouTube is easier and cheaper than hiring a scouting staff I guess
How have that guys previous dark horses turned out?
To be fair, it's hard to know what a team's needs will be once a mid round pick has developed to a point where they can contribute. Trades, injuries, draft busts, etc.. they all can happen in the 5years that takesThis only exists on hfboards when someone wants to start a straw man.
Drafts don't exist in a vacuum to the team needs... chib was a good pick because he's a faller but the Jets don't need to hit a home run with a bottom six winger... they need a homerun with D
Mid round D and goalies are more likely to develop into useful nhlers than forwards are
This draft is pretty meh on all sides though so whatever
Overall I think this is one of those blah draft years... seems like we have another heinola at bestI think its been pretty solid. We have drafted well over the last few. You saying you don't like our picks this draft?
Overall I think this is one of those blah draft years... seems like we have another heinola at best
We really dont need another undersized winger and ive also kind of soured on our finnish scouting (and no i dont consider lambert a finnish scouting score - he fell to where character concerns had him)
Late rounds I'd much rather take a flyer on a goalie or a Dman - very very few forward gems are found
I'm cheering for chibs but if we had gone positional pick then 6'4 rhd Iorio would be in our system likely making the jump this year...To be fair, it's hard to know what a team's needs will be once a mid round pick has developed to a point where they can contribute. Trades, injuries, draft busts, etc.. they all can happen in the 5years that takes
Since we're talking homeruns... all a batter can do is put the best swing they can on a pitch. In terms of Chibs, that's what the org did. You always go with the guy who has the highest likelihood of becoming an everyday NHL player
I don't disagree.. and I think that Chevy probably made a misstep with his run on wingers in the 1st roundI'm cheering for chibs but if we had gone positional pick then 6'4 rhd Iorio would be in our system likely making the jump this year...
D and natural C are the most costly players to sign or trade for... this is just a simple fact
Thank you for your opinion- it is valued but it's your opinion.The undersized winger is more of a Tanev then a Petan and the defender is already bigger than Heinola.
So basically nothing like you are describing.
He had Lambert listed as #3 last year.Watching YouTube is easier and cheaper than hiring a scouting staff I guess
How have that guys previous dark horses turned out?
where did he have the jets as SC winners?He had Lambert listed as #3 last year.
He had Lucius at #20 and Chibrikov at #22 in their draft years.
He had McGroarty at a mid 2nd round pick.
I believe he had Barlow as a mid to low second rounder.
So we are not following him thenHe had Lambert listed as #3 last year.
He had Lucius at #20 and Chibrikov at #22 in their draft years.
He had McGroarty at a mid 2nd round pick.
I believe he had Barlow as a mid to low second rounder.
Two picks and a place that wasn't on his M-NTC listThank you for your opinion- it is valued but it's your opinion.
Heinola and freij have very similar scouting reports - the boom or bust and tunnel vision makes him closer to niku if we are honest
And sure the Jets need another Tanev or more likely AJF... perfect - depth wins cups
Two picks gets you John Marino - sign me up any day.
I agree with him on Barlow. I don’t think Barlow should have been picked that high.So we are not following him then
The one that kicks in on July 1 - same as sergachevs ...?Two picks and a place that wasn't on his M-NTC list