Aaaarrgghh
Registered User
- Jul 17, 2022
- 780
- 856
I know we're not looking at Iginla, but man, if we're fifth or sixth, I can't help but think he should get a long look. Someone posted this tweet on the Habs board and this sort of dogged tenacity with the puck would be incredible to have:
I think the 2023 draft was the first draft since 2014 where the Blue Jackets didn't draft any Russians. Was there any specific reason for that or is that just how it turned out?
I think the 2023 draft was the first draft since 2014 where the Blue Jackets didn't draft any Russians. Was there any specific reason for that or is that just how it turned out?
I thought about this too when Vincent mentioned that they are a light team, that there is a lot of smaller guys drafted lately. I suspect that is more a by-product of the scouting staff just preferring skill and hockey sense to size though.I was looking at our drafts last summer, and the last few drafts Jarmo seemed to go for shorter North Americans.
Last year he drafted Brindley, Whitelaw, Strathmann, and Pinelli. The year before it was Dumais and Mateychuk.
I sure hope so, for the very reason you mentioned. Columbus have done quite well scouting Russians. It's why I'm optimistic about the chances of Columbus drafting Surin. If they, for whatever reason, had lost their man on the ground there though, then I'm less hopeful about it. Oh well, we'll see.Our Russian scouting is obviously the best part of our drafting, maybe the only thing above average about our drafting. I'd guess it's just how it turned out.
I sure hope so, for the very reason you mentioned. Columbus have done quite well scouting Russians. It's why I'm optimistic about the chances of Columbus drafting Surin. If they, for whatever reason, had lost their man on the ground there though, then I'm less hopeful about it. Oh well, we'll see.
I have a hard time imagining Surin being there in the 2nd round, despite his typical rankings. Especially if he continues to have a strong playoffs in the MHL finals - he is the top center for Lokomitiv vs Demidov's SKA 1946 squad. So I don't imagine we'll get a crack at Surin.
My other lower ranked guy that I'm convinced is too good for it is Jesse Pulkkinen:
With that skillset at 6'6, he should be pushing into the six top defensemen group.
So as enamored as I am with these players I don't think they will be Blue Jackets. The flip side of that is that we have a shot at one of the best. At 4 or 5 we'll have a chance to get one of Demidov or Lindstrom. Or my personal favorite, Buium, who was just immaculate today as Denver won the national championship.
I don't think Trotz is that foolish. I hope not, anyways.I think you're right, though I'll hold out hope for something like their 2nd and Boqvist for Nashville's 1st or something like that to get him.
I know we're not looking at Iginla, but man, if we're fifth or sixth, I can't help but think he should get a long look. Someone posted this tweet on the Habs board and this sort of dogged tenacity with the puck would be incredible to have:
There's also value in using a pick now instead of waiting for a year, not to mention the team is surely hoping that the 2nd rounder will be a worse pick next year.imo they have nothing to gain by punting the pick to next year, unless they think this is a really weak draft and only have first round grades on a handful of guys.
the highest a second round pick can be is 33rd. this year's pick is set to be 36th. if they have ~25 guys graded as first rounders, it's almost certain that at least one will still be there at 36 given how much draft boards diverge team-by-team after the first dozen picks.
different players but similar tier prospectHow good is Celebrini? Would Fantilli be a good comparison?
Similar points production in the NCAA. As far as I've heard, he is very good at basically everything and has ironed out a lot of fine details in his game through hard work.How good is Celebrini? Would Fantilli be a good comparison?
extremely good and extremely polished player. saying he doesn't have any weaknesses is true but also undersells how good his strengths are. would've been in the fantilli/carlsson tier last year and perhaps even gone ahead of them.How good is Celebrini? Would Fantilli be a good comparison?
Is Helenius getting ranked as the classic high floor, low ceiling player of the draft, since he is a well rounded mid sized player?Pronman's latest list is out:
1. Celebrini
2. Levshunov
3. Yakemchuk
4. Buium
5. Silayev
6. Catton
7. Parekh
8. Demidov
9. Dickinson
10. Helenius
11. Lindstrom
12. Sennecke
13. Jiricek
14. Eiserman
15. Iginla
16. Chernyshov
17. Greentree
18. Brandsegg-Nygard
19. Surin
It goes through 40 but I'll stop and not spoil all of his work.
pronman put him in the "bubble NHL all star and top of the lineup player" and the comp was robert thomas, which would be a great outcome.Is Helenius getting ranked as the classic high floor, low ceiling player of the draft, since he is a well rounded mid sized player?
Is Helenius getting ranked as the classic high floor, low ceiling player of the draft, since he is a well rounded mid sized player?
pronman put him in the "bubble NHL all star and top of the lineup player" and the comp was robert thomas, which would be a great outcome.
the comps are always interesting because some are really ambitious (celebrini to crosby, silayev to chara) and others are kind of head-scratchers (parekh to klingberg, demidov to skinner).
of note, matvei gridin (who i'd love to get with the second round pick) got a yegor chinakhov comp and adam jiricek got a gavrikov comp.
based on the writeups, i'd love to target gridin (39th on the list) in the second, but a few other guys in that range who jump out:
- sacha boisvert (25th)
- julius miettinen (26th)
- nikita artanmonov (28th)
- jett luchanko (36th)
I like Helenius' game a lot. He's a smart guy that tries to play a simple game. I like those kinds of players. He feels like the kind of guy to elevate his team-mates' play. When you give Thomas as a comparison, would you say that Helenius has top 6 upside? I've heard differing opinions. Many seem to think he's a 2C at best, but now I'm hearing more and more talk of him having top 6 potential. The reason for him not being rated as having a top 6 ceiling, as far as I understand, is that he seemingly doesn't have "the tools." But I've wondered if part of that is him trying to play a simple game. I seem to recall hearing that he was a bit flashier when playing on the junior level.Helenius and Demidov both aren't getting enough credit for how tough they are. Both are well built, very strong on their edges, and both love to dictate physically. Demidov is also very long for his height (an underrated part of the size discussion). The Skinner comp is nonsense.
The Thomas comp for Helenius I think is legit in terms of upside, Helenius is very skilled and very smart. There's a lot of Nick Suzuki there. But Helenius is also more physical and nasty than Thomas and I think more than Suzuki.
I like that he hasn't given up on Adam Jiricek, though the Gavrikov comp is ridiculous. Jiricek will most likely never have even close to the physical strength of Gavrikov, even after he fills out.
I like Helenius' game a lot. He's a smart guy that tries to play a simple game. I like those kinds of players. He feels like the kind of guy to elevate his team-mates' play. When you give Thomas as a comparison, would you say that Helenius has top 6 upside? I've heard differing opinions. Many seem to think he's a 2C at best, but now I'm hearing more and more talk of him having top 6 potential. The reason for him not being rated as having a top 6 ceiling, as far as I understand, is that he seemingly doesn't have "the tools." But I've wondered if part of that is him trying to play a simple game. I seem to recall hearing that he was a bit flashier when playing on the junior level.
Did he get hurt in the playoffs? I haven't seen anything. Thanks for any input.After reading about LIndstrom's latest injury I think I'm off the bandwagon. The troubling thing to me about the rest of the choices (sans Celebrini) is that there doesn't seem to be any real consensus as to who ranks where. To me that says one of two things - either they all are going to be good players or this is going to turn out to be a crap shoot of a draft (moreso than normal).
From 4/11 The Athletic:Did he get hurt in the playoffs? I haven't seen anything. Thanks for any input.
Did he get hurt in the playoffs? I haven't seen anything. Thanks for any input.