A Loyal Demidog
Marc Bergevin's Bitch
- Oct 20, 2016
- 9,756
- 11,931
Something tells me if Chicago snubs Demidov, Montreal will swap picks with Anaheim. Big hunch.By losing $100 when Demigod lands in CBJ? Really?
Something tells me if Chicago snubs Demidov, Montreal will swap picks with Anaheim. Big hunch.By losing $100 when Demigod lands in CBJ? Really?
Get ready to learn losing every game 2-1 buddy
Friedman admitting he has no inside info...
WE BEEN LEARNING THAT, BUDDY.Get ready to learn losing every game 2-1 buddy
Yeah Buium is number 3 for me, but in a tier with forwards I'd pick ahead of him (Iginla, Catton, Sennecke, Lindstrom)WE BEEN LEARNING THAT, BUDDY.
In all seriousness, I'd pick Dickinson. I like this game the most overall.
I'd be fine with Buium too.
I'd much rather trade down in the top 10, because we can use the additional assets to help move our other 1st pick up into the top 10ish area. Picking at say, 7 + 10 could be interesting. Could result in something totally out of the box, like two of Dickinson/Buium/Sennecke/Silayev/Catton/Iginla drafted. Just a fun thought experiment.Keep in mind that Mathias Brunet was the first last year to leak that Michkov was on the Habs no draft list.
These kinds of D that will be available to draft bring offenseGet ready to learn losing every game 2-1 buddy
If that’s the case, I would hope for DickinsonLess than 3 days until the most "unpredictable" draft ever. It's so unpredictable that I'm 95% sure the first 4 players selected will be Celebrini, Demidov, Levshunov, and Lindstrom. At least our pick will be unpredictable, as always
Can someone explain me what they see in Lindstrom because I just don't see it? Demidov looks like a legit gamebreaker. Hell I'd prefer Dickinson/Buium over Lindstrom.
Does he have enough skill to be an elite F? Wasn't IQ a concern?Big, physical, fast and skilled. The full package.
If it wasn't for his injury, we'd be talking about Chicago picking him 2nd.
Hell, it might still happen. Who knows.
Have you seen Lindstrom's goals per game? Combine that with his size, ferocious play and versatility as someone who can play up the middle or on the wing. The concern with Lindstrom is his back.Can someone explain me what they see in Lindstrom because I just don't see it? Demidov looks like a legit gamebreaker. Hell I'd prefer Dickinson/Buium over Lindstrom.
His comparable seems to be Kreider, which is wonderful but not the gamebreaking elite F we need.Have you seen Lindstrom's goals per game? Combine that with his size, ferocious play and versatility as someone who can play up the middle or on the wing. The concern with Lindstrom is his back.
Does he have enough skill to be an elite F? Wasn't IQ a concern?
Best example of IQ concern is Josh Anderson. I hope then that he can be developed into the superstar F we desperately need.I often read this as a talking point for guys like Slaf, Fantilli and now Lindstrom. For the life of me, I need to see some examples of what people mean by "IQ concern" concerning these guys.
He wont be trying to dangle guys at his own blue line, or trying to deke 2 guys on an odd man rush for his team, that's for sure.
As for the skills, he has a booming shot and silky hands in small areas. Will come out of the corner with the puck and and make the right pass all the time. This is pretty much where the game of hockey is played and he excels at it.
Best example of IQ concern is Josh Anderson. I hope then that he can be developed into the superstar F we desperately need.
I often read this as a talking point for guys like Slaf, Fantilli and now Lindstrom. For the life of me, I need to see some examples of what people mean by "IQ concern" concerning these guys.
He wont be trying to dangle guys at his own blue line, or trying to deke 2 guys on an odd man rush for his team, that's for sure.
As for the skills, he has a booming shot and silky hands in small areas. Will come out of the corner with the puck and and make the right pass all the time. This is pretty much where the game of hockey is played and he excels at it.
Draft Lindstrom. Play him 41 games and Dach 41 games. Both will avoid injury and we’ll get a mix of goals and assists.Lindstrom is like Kirby Dach, but if Kirby Dach was a goal scorer instead of a playmaker.
He’s also faster, has better hands, and is more explosive. More physical, meaner, and better puck protection too. Lindstrom plays at a much more fervent pace as well, whereas Dach is a more cerebral, slow-the-game down type of player. They’re actually not really alike at all lmao.Lindstrom is like Kirby Dach, but if Kirby Dach was a goal scorer instead of a playmaker.