At #5 OA, generally you look for a top line C, a high scoring winger or a 1st pair D.
Is Helenius a #1 C in the NHL? Everybody can see the floor, but is that a case of a young player with a mature game performing well against man or is there really a #1 C in there?
Production in Liiga is in the Lundell range (0.71 vs 0.64 PPG). I was also not a fan of Lundell in his draft year, and ended up about where I thought he should (#12). Looked like safe pick at the time, and he'll be a good #2/#3 C probably for a long time.
I think he's a #2 C ultimately, I don't see the elite flashes I'd want in a top offensive C. He works hard and he's agile, but I don't the great top speed, dynamic abilities or the top notch offensive vision I'd look for in a somewhat small #1 C. He's no Brayden Point.
He'll get picked early (McKenzie's poll had him at #8 I think and I doubt many jumped over him beside Buium, Parekh and maybe Iginla/Yakemchuk), I just hope not by Montreal at #5-7.
I'd 10/10 for a potential franchise D like Dickinson, Levshunov or Buium over prospect like Helenius at #5-7 OA, but that is me.