HF Habs: 2024 NHL Draft Thread

Who do you want at #5?

  • Tij Iginla

    Votes: 209 49.5%
  • Cole Eiserman

    Votes: 14 3.3%
  • Berkly Catton

    Votes: 92 21.8%
  • Konsta Helenius

    Votes: 13 3.1%
  • Beckett Sennecke

    Votes: 75 17.8%
  • Zayne Parekh

    Votes: 19 4.5%

  • Total voters
    422
Status
Not open for further replies.

Cubebrick

Registered User
Mar 5, 2014
555
637
Helenius is not getting much love on here, but the numbers in Liiga are eye-popping. Is it because he's a safe, mature player with a high-floor but low-ceiling? Those are not very popular on this board
He's well rounded and not the flashiest, which for some reason seems to be regarded as "lame" nowadays. He may not have any exceptional tool but he'a a great, intelligent play driver with a high motor and awareness in all 3 zones. Whether he ends up playing C or W in the NHL doesn't have any relevance for me personally since he's very efficient at everything he does on the ice.

I think we can question whether or not he has much room to grow as opposed to others (close to his ceiling) since he plays a mature game already and if he can sustain the pressure in a more physical NHL. But on the flip side, his floor is also much higher than most forwards within his range (same with MBN imo).

Not sure yet where he ranks on my list, he probably won't be my first choice but I also don't get the hate. He's a solid player. If you can add another Suzuki-like player (in terms of efficiency) in the Habs top 6 then I'm all for it.
 

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,796
50,241
Button on the sick podcast.

Demidov - compares him to Kucherov.

Says he's the 2nd best player in the draft/could go as high as 2nd.

Marinaro keeps going about small teams. Says the Habs are the 6th heaviest in the league. Button agrees. Says you can't win with a small team, but later added in you can have some small players, just can't have a bunch.

He says he's seeing smaller players being phased out as the bigger players are coming in with skill.

Button's mock

1 - Celebrini
2 - Demidov
3- Parekh
4- Dickinson
5- Lindstrom



6 - Habs - Eiserman
A lot of publications have us taking Eiserman but…
 
  • Like
Reactions: habsfan891

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,621
107,202
Halifax
Drouin did outpoint Nate 105 to 75 that season and got CHL Player of the Year in their draft year. My point is that CHL production isn't the be all to end all. All the forwards in play with our 1st pick are killing it production wise in the CHL or would if they were in the CHL.

Aho's an amazing player. I was at the Canes-Habs game Saturday night and he was bar none the best player on both teams.


Parekh seems to be rising fast on a lot of lists.

Yeah I had a front row seat to Drouin and Nate. Drouin was the more impressive junior player but you could tell Nate was special.
 
  • Like
Reactions: habsfan891

Jabba11

Hockey Lobby
Nov 28, 2009
6,921
3,951
hockeylobby.blogspot.com
I really don't get the Lindstrom love. Like he's a sure thing. I don't know, I might be among the few, but not a fan of him. Skating mechanics is awkward, for a top prospect, he only has 19 assists (yes in 32 games) but it's junior league, you have to be able to create. I also am worried about his injury, we should not take a chance on such a risky prospect. He is too much of a wild care for me. Too many question marks. People tend to forget we need talent and skills, not just big bodies. This team lacks scoring/offensive abilities. We need a pure talent.
 

Schooner Guy

Registered User
Jun 23, 2006
13,914
13,992
Yeah I had a front row seat to Drouin and Nate. Drouin was the more impressive junior player but you could tell Nate was special.
I know that. I was pointing out to a poster that points aren't everything. Hence the Drouin picture. Drouin was 21 points ahead of the next highest scoring teammate (Frk) on that Moosheads team in his draft year. Catton played with an overager who had 108 points.
 

Playmaker09

Registered User
Sep 11, 2008
3,531
1,823
Helenius is not getting much love on here, but the numbers in Liiga are eye-popping. Is it because he's a safe, mature player with a high-floor but low-ceiling? Those are not very popular on this board
Deservedly so. Undersized two-way Cs without elite attributes have been some of the most overdrafted profiles in recent memory.
Jost, Turcotte, Krebs.

A lot of teams have failed chasing the next Sebastian Aho.
 

Schooner Guy

Registered User
Jun 23, 2006
13,914
13,992
It's a little odd considering earlier today it was posted that we haven't even met with him
Our GM and VP of Hockey Ops both live in the same town as Eisermann and are extremely connected to hockey people in every corner of New England.

Don't worry. Habs will interview ALL the potential picks in their draft range. This brass does its due diligence.
 

crosbyshow

Registered User
Aug 25, 2017
1,874
2,575
I really don't get the Lindstrom love. Like he's a sure thing. I don't know, I might be among the few, but not a fan of him. Skating mechanics is awkward, for a top prospect, he only has 19 assists (yes in 32 games) but it's junior league, you have to be able to create. I also am worried about his injury, we should not take a chance on such a risky prospect. He is too much of a wild care for me. Too many question marks. People tend to forget we need talent and skills, not just big bodies. This team lacks scoring/offensive abilities. We need a pure talent.
But but he is 6.4.....no matter your flaws ...People dont want to see it if you are big and tall...

On the other hand.when you are 5.10 or 5.11 watch out....you have to be perfect...even then...

Lindstrom has 19 assists on a stack team...big red flag..the guy has no vision.

Again...Catton and Iginla are better than Lindstrom...
 

Schooner Guy

Registered User
Jun 23, 2006
13,914
13,992
I really don't get the Lindstrom love. Like he's a sure thing. I don't know, I might be among the few, but not a fan of him. Skating mechanics is awkward, for a top prospect, he only has 19 assists (yes in 32 games) but it's junior league, you have to be able to create. I also am worried about his injury, we should not take a chance on such a risky prospect. He is too much of a wild care for me. Too many question marks. People tend to forget we need talent and skills, not just big bodies. This team lacks scoring/offensive abilities. We need a pure talent.

But but he is 6.4.....no matter your flaws ...People dont want to see it if you are big and tall...

On the other hand.when you are 5.10 or 5.11 watch out....you have to be perfect...even then...

Lindstrom has 19 assists on a stack team...big red flag..the guy has no vision.

Again...Catton and Iginla are better than Lindstrom...
Are either of you going to mention that he scored 27 goals in 32 games?
 

Schooner Guy

Registered User
Jun 23, 2006
13,914
13,992
Are you gonna mention that Catton scored 54 goals and he was alone on his team???

Catton scores ..and feed his teammates..
Catton played with an overage 108 point player. LMAO!

I certainly haven't knocked Catton's production. My concern with Catton is I don't know if his style of game will be effective in NHL playoffs. It was so-so in WHL playoffs. I certainly don't see him as a center in the show and I think we'll have better options with our first pick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Great Weal

crosbyshow

Registered User
Aug 25, 2017
1,874
2,575
Catton played with an overage 108 point player. LMAO!

I certainly haven't knocked Catton's production. My concern with Catton is I don't know if his style of game will be effective in NHL playoffs. It was so-so in WHL playoffs. I certainly don't see him as a center in the show and I think we'll have better options with our first pick.
I red the exact same thing for Suzuki, Stankoven etc....and Catton has better 17 years old than those guys.

Those guys were not 6.0 foot tall...Suzuki was an average skater but with a great IQ..and he was drafted 13 th overall...so we will see with Catton.

...but there is not a single habs player who were or are not able to do zone entrance variations like Catton..not one
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings

calder candidate

Registered User
Feb 25, 2003
5,118
3,066
Montreal
Visit site
I really don't get the Lindstrom love. Like he's a sure thing. I don't know, I might be among the few, but not a fan of him. Skating mechanics is awkward, for a top prospect, he only has 19 assists (yes in 32 games) but it's junior league, you have to be able to create. I also am worried about his injury, we should not take a chance on such a risky prospect. He is too much of a wild care for me. Too many question marks. People tend to forget we need talent and skills, not just big bodies. This team lacks scoring/offensive abilities. We need a pure talent.
I kinda agree I’m always worried when a player has so much more goal than he does have assists, kind of a red flag. But I don’t see how the skating or the injury / hand surgery (unless there is something else) is a issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jabba11

NobleSix

High Tech Low-Life.
Apr 20, 2013
17,169
16,675
CyberSpace
www.ilovebees.co
I think it's going to come down to whichever one of Demidov or Lindstrom are available at our pick. If both are, Id think they would go with Lindstrom based on past selections (although I personally would go with Demidov) If neither are, then it gets wild.

With so many great defense prospects this year I think one of them will be available at our pick. Dmen are just too valuable and most teams picking ahead of us I could see opting for a defenseman over the forwards.

I still stand by my prediction that Lindstrom will be the 2nd forward taken in the draft, even given his injury. Teams drool over his mixture of size, speed, skill, and position and I don't see a GM opting for a smaller winger over him.

I'd be happy with either Demidov or Lindstrom, although I'd prefer Demidov myself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad