clydesdale line
Connor BeJesus
- Jan 10, 2012
- 25,480
- 24,218
Can we please drop this trope? Please. For the love of god.Awe c'mon, you could have gotten Vanacker at 34
Well I feel better if you like the pick at least. Never heard of this guy though.Vanacker is good. Not sure I would've moved the 2nd rounder just to take him, but this is a good player for the pool.
I watched him a lot when watching lardis. I like him but I still don’t think he’s got the upside that others like chernyshov do and that’s my constant complaint is we just take guys that are high floor, mid ceiling guys.
Sign of a GM that doesn't have ball to do shit
WTF is up with the no socks and short pants shit with these kids?
Geee it would be great to have an another 2nd pick.
With this logic they should have never made a significant investment in HossaHad a torn labrum solid guy to trade up for
I like Chernyshov but he's absolutely a floor pick, not a ceiling one.I watched him a lot when watching lardis. I like him but I still don’t think he’s got the upside that others like chernyshov do and that’s my constant complaint is we just take guys that are high floor, mid ceiling guys.
I hate the word “reach,” especially when you get to this point in the draft.
I see Chernyshov with more offensive upside than that. His puck game is high end to me and I think he does a good job being deceptive offensively. Beats people.I like Chernyshov but he's absolutely a floor pick, not a ceiling one.
He's Katchouk with consistency. Solid bottom 6 role player.
Van at least has some 2nd line upside.
KD with a horrendous night.so the hawks traded 20 OA+3 2nd rounders for 18 & 27 (picked 2 guys that would have been there at 20 & 34)...?
Thats exactly what they did.so the hawks traded 20 OA+3 2nd rounders for 18 & 27 (picked 2 guys that would have been there at 20 & 34)...?
Thats exactly what they did.