Paul Allen
Registered User
This would have been the year to drop a couple spots at the lottery and not have this silly #2 debate.I actually wouldn't mind at all if they move down to 4-5 and take Iginla.
This would have been the year to drop a couple spots at the lottery and not have this silly #2 debate.I actually wouldn't mind at all if they move down to 4-5 and take Iginla.
I never said everyone. So I don't know why you interpret as every single poster. But I also have referred to chgo and not just people on here im talking about it. You said you're not a prospect guy so I don't even know what your defense about it is.you said “they”, “they” here being “People (who) keep saying they want demidov.” i’ve seen plenty of people who “keep saying that” who haven’t said anything about how bedard needs help, including myself. i’ve also seen plenty of people gesture at the d prospect pool in justifying picking a dman. you don’t see me making sweeping generalizations about everyone that wants lev or whoever doing so out of a sense of positional need. the closest i got to it is when i said that’s what it would read like to me if the hawks made that pick. dare i say it’s you with some kind of psychological complex you don’t want to acknowledge? no, i dare not. i don’t know you, and evidently i am not nearly as presumptuous as you. or at least, i’m not here to score points on a pseudonymous hockey forum.
Agreed 100%, that's an awful argument.I never said everyone. So I don't know why you interpret as every single poster. But I also have referred to chgo and not just people on here im talking about it. You said you're not a prospect guy so I don't even know what your defense about it is.
Chgo Greg guy yesterday was going on Bedard needs help and a winger, so I can't see how you can't pass on that... those are need over evaluation of prospect points. They could at least stick with that
“they” is a generalization. it applies to tbe category of people you delimited as quoted above, and then went on to describe as being delusional about the fact that they only want demidov because of positional need. i’m just responding to what you said. hence why i made the very kindly worded suggestion that you should refer to who you are talking about, preferably by name and with quotes. otherwise it comes off in the way i am outlining currently.I never said everyone.
Let's all be honest
This is the equivalent to Pace thinking he is smartest guy in room and reaching on Trubisky
Drafting Levshunov at #2 is going to be first moment of real pause about direction this franchise is going under Davidson
Yakemchuk is bigger, stronger, meaner with a better offensive game than Lev and has a good work ethic. I just don't get the appeal for Lev.
We could trade down and get Yakemchuk
So yeah just makes no sense to value Levshunov at #2
Much worse skater and worse in transition.Yakemchuk is bigger, stronger, meaner with a better offensive game than Lev and has a good work ethic. I just don't get the appeal for Lev.
I'm not worried about lack of W compared to Cs. Its easy for Cs to transition to W.Another reason passing on Demidov is mistake IMO is that this organization biggest need in system at this moment is talent at W
We drafted Bedard #1 and our 3 best F prospects are all C's (Nazar, Moore and Greene) while we have also utilized a lot of draft capital already on our D pool
Korchinski (1st rounder)
Rinzel (1st rounder)
Allan (1st rounder)
Vlasic (2nd rounder)
Harding (3rd rounder)
Kaiser (3rd rounder)
Del Mastro (4th rounder)
Phillips (5th round)
Meanwhile we have very little on W in system or on roster
Kantserov (2nd rounder)
Lardis (3rd rounder)
Hayes (3rd rounder)
Are only potential high-end wingers we have of noted promise
I don't think Yak is that bad of a skater. Good edge work and he can fly when he gets going but he definitely lacks burst. He's got good hands for a forward let alone a defenseman an absolute bomb of a shot and he's much more physical player.Much worse skater and worse in transition.
We just have to hope that playing a second season in the NCAA will allow him to progress to a level that we didn't see this year.
Agreed. I believe that to be as much an argument that Lev>Buium in that Lev turned around MSU while Buium joined a stacked Denver team. It helps explain the production difference between the two players.The idea that Lev was a one man show at MSU is dumb.
Obviously I'm on record that I think Levshunov is the wrong pick.. but yeah, both of those guys aren't my favorite at 2.I don't think Yak is that bad of a skater. Good edge work and he can fly when he gets going but he definitely lacks burst. He's got good hands for a forward let alone a defenseman an absolute bomb of a shot and he's much more physical player.
He's definitely not as good moving the puck up and he has the same hockey iq questions defensively but I don't want to take either at 2. But if we're rolling the dice I want the bigger meaner more talented player.
Not close to the same situation. Trubisky was a huge reach and had many questions about his actual talent level.Let's all be honest
This is the equivalent to Pace thinking he is smartest guy in room and reaching on Trubisky
Drafting Levshunov at #2 is going to be first moment of real pause about direction this franchise is going under Davidson
And frankly if Levshunov regresses next season at Michigan it will be potentially fireable offense