NFL: 2024 NFL draft discussion thread, Draft begins 4/25 8pm, 4/26 6pm, 4/27 12pm

Big Poppa Puck

HF's Villain
Dec 8, 2009
20,602
989
D-Boss' Dungeon
McCarthy is either going in the top 12 or in the 2nd round (maybe 32 if someone wants to trade up for the 5th year.) I'm not sure if the hype is real or if this is Malik Willis/Will Levis again.

I don't know what to think, he didn't have to do much in college, and previously I wanted the Vikings to stay far away at 11 thinking it would be Ponder part 2. I've been kinda talked in to "meh" if that is indeed the pick at 11, especially if Cousins leaves. You have to take a shot at some point. I want no parts of Bo Nix or Penix at 11.

Even with Ponder, I knew that was a reach as I had him going round 2, but I also understood why they did it with only Joe Webb on the roster and mid-lockout. I probably would have taken Dalton if I was reaching there both in the moment and in hindsight. That was also considered a "deep" QB class and most of them sucked other than Newton. Gabbert, Locker, Ponder, Mallet all busts. Dalton was decent and Kaepernick was ok for a few years. You can argue Tyrod Taylor was the 3rd best QB in that class and he went in the 6th

Out of Williams, Maye, Daniels, McCarthy, Nix and Penix there's a good chance at least half of em are complete busts. And maybe a 4th hangs around as a backup/fringe starter.
 
Last edited:

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
26,802
10,119
McCarthy is either going in the top 12 or in the 2nd round (maybe 32 if someone wants to trade up for the 5th year.) I'm not sure if the hype is real or if this is Malik Willis/Will Levis again.

I don't know what to think, he did have to do much in college, and previously I wanted the Vikings to stay far away at 11 thinking it would be Ponder part 2. I've been kinda talked in to "meh" if that is indeed the pick at 11, especially if Cousins leaves. You have to take a shot at some point. I want no parts of Bo Nix or Penix at 11.

Even with Ponder, I knew that was a reach as I had him going round 2, but I also understood why they did it with only Joe Webb on the roster and mid-lockout. I probably would have taken Dalton if I was reaching there both in the moment and in hindsight. That was also considered a "deep" QB class and most of them sucked other than Newton. Gabbert, Locker, Ponder, Mallet all busts. Dalton was decent and Kaepernick was ok for a few years. You can argue Tyrod Taylor was the 3rd best QB in that class and he went in the 6th

Out of Williams, Maye, Daniels, McCarthy, Nix and Penix there's a good chance at least half of em are complete busts. And maybe a 4th hangs around as a backup/fringe starter.
I'm sure those teams in the 8-13 range like ATL, DEN, LV, MIN would like to trade down and gain an extra 3rd (minimum or upwards of a 2nd) but the risk is then the QB that they like gets taken ahead of them.
 

Donnie740

Registered User
May 28, 2021
1,535
2,246
So pretty much the RG3 trade.

Given the haul they already have from Carolina and maybe a nice return from Fields and their own #7 the Bears shouldn't get cute.

Peyton Manning was a sure-fire franchise QB when he went first overall.

Over the past 25yrs since then, there’s been EIGHTEEN (18) quarterbacks selected #1 overall and only TWO (2) of them have gone on to win a Super Bowl.

For context purposes, in the 25yrs prior to that there was a grand total of EIGHT (8) selected and half of them ended up winning a Super Bowl.
 

Hasbro

Family Friend
Sponsor
Apr 1, 2004
52,856
17,007
South Rectangle
Peyton Manning was a sure-fire franchise QB when he went first overall.

Over the past 25yrs since then, there’s been EIGHTEEN (18) quarterbacks selected #1 overall and only TWO (2) of them have gone on to win a Super Bowl.

For context purposes, in the 25yrs prior to that there was a grand total of EIGHT (8) selected and half of them ended up winning a Super Bowl.
3 more made it (Burrow, Newton, Goff). 3 more were worth the pick (Vick, Luck, Palmer) and the Jury is still out on 4 (Lawrence, Murray, Mayfield and Young). Also Two teams the have picked #1 since then have won the Super Bowl (KC and TB).

I'm all for Chicago getting a case of galaxy brain here.
 

Romang67

BitterSwede
Jan 2, 2011
29,839
22,132
Evanston, IL

First overall picks are considerably more likely to become prolific passers, long term starters, and pro bowlers than are other first round QBs.

The Panthers trade broke people's brains. A trade between the Bears and the Falcons where the Falcons only give up draft capital is likely going to result in the Falcons winning the god-awful NFC South and the Bears getting first round picks in the 20s.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
29,673
25,474
I saw an analysis someone did where, even forecasting future 1sts as 20th overall, the Bears could expect more value over replacement from taking a haul for 1OA vs taking the QB.

I also think the Bears need to consider that if they bet on Fields and are wrong, they're probably back in the top 10 next year.

For me it comes down to whether you think Williams is an average 1OA or a great one.
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
188,370
40,258
I saw an analysis someone did where, even forecasting future 1sts as 20th overall, the Bears could expect more value over replacement from taking a haul for 1OA vs taking the QB.

I also think the Bears need to consider that if they bet on Fields and are wrong, they're probably back in the top 10 next year.

For me it comes down to whether you think Williams is an average 1OA or a great one.
If they bet on Fields and are wrong, everyone’s going to be fired anyways. They probably should’ve been this year, but they started picking up some wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LT and Peat

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
26,802
10,119
If they bet on Fields and are wrong, everyone’s going to be fired anyways. They probably should’ve been this year, but they started picking up some wins.
Right and then those extra draft picks are for the next gm to use not Poles. So massive decision for him to get right for his own future as well.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
29,673
25,474
If they bet on Fields and are wrong, everyone’s going to be fired anyways. They probably should’ve been this year, but they started picking up some wins.

Barring a guarantee that's not the case from the owner, that's probably true and probably the deciding factor.
 

Donnie740

Registered User
May 28, 2021
1,535
2,246
I saw an analysis someone did where, even forecasting future 1sts as 20th overall, the Bears could expect more value over replacement from taking a haul for 1OA vs taking the QB.

I also think the Bears need to consider that if they bet on Fields and are wrong, they're probably back in the top 10 next year.

For me it comes down to whether you think Williams is an average 1OA or a great one.

I don’t even see Caleb Williams as being even an average QB - - he’s more likely mediocre to bust calibre. Way too many red flags from watching him in college.

Bears GM and coach are going to be fired if they draft Williams and he struggles.

Fields won them 7 games last year in spite of the off-field gong show in Chicago, including 4 wins in their last 6 games. More importantly, six of their ten losses were by one score.

The Bears with Fields are much closer to double digit wins than most people realize. Especially if they add in two top ten picks in the first round this year plus another two picks in the top of round 2.

Drafting Williams and dealing Fields puts Chicago right back at square one of a rebuild.
 

Romang67

BitterSwede
Jan 2, 2011
29,839
22,132
Evanston, IL
I don’t even see Caleb Williams as being even an average QB - - he’s more likely mediocre to bust calibre. Way too many red flags from watching him in college.

Bears GM and coach are going to be fired if they draft Williams and he struggles.

Fields won them 7 games last year in spite of the off-field gong show in Chicago, including 4 wins in their last 6 games. More importantly, six of their ten losses were by one score.

The Bears with Fields are much closer to double digit wins than most people realize. Especially if they add in two top ten picks in the first round this year plus another two picks in the top of round 2.

Drafting Williams and dealing Fields puts Chicago right back at square one of a rebuild.
Fields didn't win 7 games last season.

6 QB needy teams passed on Fields in the 2021 draft because of the clear limitations he had as a pocket passer. He hasn't developed that. It's time to move on.
 

Peat

Registered User
Jun 14, 2016
29,673
25,474
Yeah, Fields was 5-8. 5-7 if you remove the game he didn't finish.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
26,802
10,119
The Bears with Fields are much closer to double digit wins than most people realize. Especially if they add in two top ten picks in the first round this year plus another two picks in the top of round 2.

Drafting Williams and dealing Fields puts Chicago right back at square one of a rebuild.
Reality is that the post rookie deal contract will also be a factor.

Last season, there were like 4 QBs who were neither at a $30 mill plus deal nor on a rookie contract as starters last season (in terms of real money paid to them).

Geno Smith got $27 mill total which only year 1 was fully guarantee.
Jimmy G got $34 mill guaranteed, so it was expected to be a 2 year deal for $23 mill average.
Baker, resurrection deal, was like $8.5 mill.
Goff at $26 mill but not guaranteed.

Cousins was mid $30 mill. Carr, was either $60 mill for 1 year or 2 years for $35 mill based on details of the contract.

So, Chicago has to be confident enough in Fields to then pay him a big contract after the 2024 season.
 

The Note

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Mar 13, 2011
9,029
7,687
KCMO
Williams is the type of talent you bet on with a first overall pick and go from there. He’s not a finished product, but no QB prospect ever will be and there’s always risk in drafting a QB. I’m not going to pretend to be some QB draft guru but enough people I trust and like have done a good job of breaking Williams down - both strengths and flaws - and the talent is plainly there to see. If you want to trade down for more picks, hope that one of MIN/LV/DEN falls in love with McCarthy and trades up to 9. Or just take another really good player there! I also don’t think you can overstate the value of resetting the rookie QB contract on top of everything else. Justin Fields shouldn’t preempt you from taking a blue chip QB prospect.
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
188,370
40,258
I don’t know about Williams or any of these guys either to know that they can or can’t make it. I know who I like the most and who I don’t, but guys who have the talent, mind, coachability, that’s going to get decided later when they take on the offenses and have coaches who don’t f*** you up. Just don’t draft the ‘toolsy’ guys because you think you can build the toolbox for them. They’re the high-risk busts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Melrose Munch

Donnie740

Registered User
May 28, 2021
1,535
2,246
So, Chicago has to be confident enough in Fields to then pay him a big contract after the 2024 season.

There’s nothing that compels Chicago to overpay Fields with a $40M to $50M contract. That’s where teams get tunnel vision and become capped out bottom feeders.

He’s a $6M cap hit in 2024 and if they pick up his option it’s a $26M cap hit in 2025. That’s two more years at a very, VERY, reasonable price.

After 2025, the Bears can simply walk away and let someone else give Fields a $50M multi year boat anchor.

The reality is, if you’ve got a strong team you can win with a mediocre QB off the scrap heap. Look at what the Eagles did with that scrub Nick Foles. The 49ers have been to the Super Bowl with two different gimps at QB - - Jim Garoppolo and Broke Purdy.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
26,802
10,119
There’s nothing that compels Chicago to overpay Fields with a $40M to $50M contract. That’s where teams get tunnel vision and become capped out bottom feeders.

He’s a $6M cap hit in 2024 and if they pick up his option it’s a $26M cap hit in 2025. That’s two more years at a very, VERY, reasonable price.

After 2025, the Bears can simply walk away and let someone else give Fields a $50M multi year boat anchor.

The reality is, if you’ve got a strong team you can win with a mediocre QB off the scrap heap. Look at what the Eagles did with that scrub Nick Foles. The 49ers have been to the Super Bowl with two different gimps at QB - - Jim Garoppolo and Broke Purdy.
The Bears, if they decide Fields is their guy have to pick up the 5th year option. What I mean, is that if Fields is the guy, the expectation/hope from the Bears is that he does play well enough to warrant that kind of big contract. Otherwise, what will they have at QB if he's not good enought to warrant a big payday. Not many QBs in that middle of the pack that sit between a rookie contract and the big money. Goff/Tanny at $27 mill with no guaranteed money as they signed a few years ago. Geno/Jimmy/Baker signed this past year with only Jimmy getting some guaranteed money in 2024 (which now due to his PED suspension, he's lost).

Bears, they made it to a SB with Grossman at QB. And with Indy not kicking to Hester got the ball around their own 35 and still couldn't score enough.

They'd have to find that magical fit that Foles was for Philly.
 

Unholy Diver

Registered User
Oct 13, 2002
19,371
3,274
in the midnight sea
The Bears, if they decide Fields is their guy have to pick up the 5th year option. What I mean, is that if Fields is the guy, the expectation/hope from the Bears is that he does play well enough to warrant that kind of big contract. Otherwise, what will they have at QB if he's not good enought to warrant a big payday. Not many QBs in that middle of the pack that sit between a rookie contract and the big money. Goff/Tanny at $27 mill with no guaranteed money as they signed a few years ago. Geno/Jimmy/Baker signed this past year with only Jimmy getting some guaranteed money in 2024 (which now due to his PED suspension, he's lost).

Bears, they made it to a SB with Grossman at QB. And with Indy not kicking to Hester got the ball around their own 35 and still couldn't score enough.

They'd have to find that magical fit that Foles was for Philly.

Over the last 30 seasons, 4 teams have won SB's without a HOF or soon to be HOF QB's, the idea of winning SB's with mid level QB's is not realistic
 

Dr Salt

Bedard saved me
Feb 26, 2019
1,657
909
ym
You don't pass up on Caleb Williams, crazy overthink. You win in this league with the best of the best at the QB position, wth indicates Fields will be? Hell Williams is a better prospect than Fields was and Fields' value has only tanked since then. For anyone mentioning the "haul" take a second to think why there'd be one for Williams but not Fields.
 

Datsyukian Deke

The Captain is Home!!
Apr 5, 2012
2,467
425
Middle Tennessee
It's not sexy or flashy, but this would be the kind of ideal draft I'd love for the Lions to have, along with picking up a few key guys in free agency to bolster the pass rush.

1708957215406.png
 

GKJ

Global Moderator
Feb 27, 2002
188,370
40,258


@GKJ @StreetHawk what is this about? Why aren't guys going to the combine?

He does explain it a bit there, those guys are going to be top 4-6 picks, at worst, so they only stand to lose and have nothing to gain working out in an environment that’s not as controlled to the degree their pro days are. We’ve seen those guys, that’s 2 Heisman winners and a finalist that could have won.

Maye didn’t have as good a season nor were his opponents any good, and he’s seeing Daniels go up the draft boards, so he’s fighting for his spot in the top 3 or 4.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Melrose Munch

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
26,802
10,119
He does explain it a bit there, those guys are going to be top 4-6 picks, at worst, so they only stand to lose and have nothing to gain working out in an environment that’s not as controlled to the degree their pro days are. We’ve seen those guys, that’s 2 Heisman winners and a finalist that could have won.

Maye didn’t have as good a season nor were his opponents any good, and he’s seeing Daniels go up the draft boards, so he’s fighting for his spot in the top 3 or 4.
Agreed. I think Daniels knows he's going no worse than 3/4. As someone will trade up for him or Maye should they get past 3 in NE. At this point, not really about when you go but where you go to as a QB.

Chi - Not a big fan of them bringing back Eberflus to be on the hot seat with a rookie QB. Could end up like Nagy/Fields ago if the QB isn't great off the hop.

Wash, new regime, have cap room and some talent.

NE, now gone away from BB run team. Structure is in place, but will the new roster decision makers get it done. I didn't hear who their OC is.

MHJ, hyped as the top WR in the draft. Does everything very well. He'd love to go to AZ/LAC vs NYG, ATL, who currently don't have a QB.

Not a huge deal. I mean MHJ probably could go and not impact his draft status.

Just curious to see how Caleb measures height wise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Melrose Munch

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad