2024 Main Training Camp Thread (Update 10/06: Cooley, Schwindt & Pelletier waived) 27 players left in camp: 3G, 8D, 16F

Volica

Papa Shango
May 15, 2012
21,662
11,358
Sort of confused where Calgary is coming from here, being in a rebuild and all. Not that I think Pelts will be much outside of a depth guy in his career; but choosing a bunch of depth vets over him is confusing.

The contract thing.
The coming into camp looking lost.
The mediocre preseason.

He didn’t help himself here either.

I think he’ll pass through, I think his calibre and especially his size will have people passing. I could see Montreal maybe, just because of the nationality thing.
 

MM917

Registered User
Aug 18, 2022
1,165
633
Bottom line, it's poor asset management and a nonsensical lack of patience. That they would prioritize utterly irrelevant mercs like Rooney or Hanley, position be damned is simply insane.

And if the Flames still haven't figured out something so basic, then hard to believe they'll one day magically put it all together.

Rooney and Hanley can pass through waivers any time they want no risk of them ever being taken. Now that is likely the same with Pelltier but there could always be one team dumb enough to think they have the magic elixir to change lack of talent.

So sending him down when teams are the healthiest they will be all year and when there are a ton of other options makes sense. Like I said it likely doesn't matter as every team has a Pelltier or two or three so unlikely he does get picked but with Rooney and hanley no chance they get taken so you save their waivers for when you have no other choice and might risk a Pelletier to a team that just lost 3 guys that week to the IR.
 

Some Other Flame

Registered User
Dec 4, 2010
7,872
9,946
I mean I’m team “Pospisil to the 4th line” probably more than anyone else, but in what world is demoting prospects who have shown much more to accommodate one who isn’t looking good great long term thinking? Punish good young players to promote ones who currently are not is a terrible philosophy.

I’m chuckling imagining the conversation between Huska and Zary when they tell him he’s getting demoted to the 4th line for 5-10 games because they have a guy who they’d rather be in the AHL we have to protect.
Except no one's being punished in this case. Rooney doesn't count because he's irrelevant.

Being on decent 4th line getting roughly 10 minutes a game is not a punishment, especially with Huska literally saying he's gone run 4 lines.

It all comes down the simple ability to think longterm versus short term reactionary moves. It's the reason why they they signed Mantha & Barrie, kept Hanley & Rooney on the roster, why they waived Solovyov & Pelletier - it's always about the short term with this franchise.
 

Yepthatsme

Registered User
Oct 25, 2020
1,602
1,600
Except no one's being punished in this case. Rooney doesn't count because he's irrelevant.

Being on decent 4th line getting roughly 10 minutes a game is not a punishment, especially with Huska literally saying he's gone run 4 lines.

It all comes down the simple ability to think longterm versus short term reactionary moves. It's the reason why they they signed Mantha & Barrie, kept Hanley & Rooney on the roster, why they waived Solovyov & Pelletier - it's always about the short term with this franchise.
If you don’t see how giving Pospisil and ESPECIALLY Zary 10 minutes a night on our 4th line isn’t punishing and detrimental I don’t think you’re in a place to be rational about this.

Sure, let’s cut Zary’s ice time by 50% to accommodate Pelletier, now that’s thinking about the future of our team. You develop players by giving them more minutes, not taking them away.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad