notbias
Registered User
- Feb 16, 2017
- 11,904
- 9,936
Chayka, the elite former GM who never achieved anything? jk
Was his sister, she runs an analytics company
Chayka, the elite former GM who never achieved anything? jk
She's a woman who runs the 2nd largest private NHL analytics company, it's terrible to put her worth based on her hotness.Is she hot? I can't say no to a hot woman. lol
Better defender is questionable to me. I've watched enough Gens games this year to see him progress but I would be stunned if we was more than a 3rd pairing guy. You are right though. We do need guys who can defend and make a first pass. Which is why I wanted Emery in the first place and would have been comfortable with taking him at 23.Danford is a better defender than Elick imo. Elick can’t handle a puck, we need guys who can defend and make a first pass.
She's a woman who runs the 2nd largest private NHL analytics company, it's terrible to put her worth based on her hotness.
Definitely don't google Meghan Chayka.
Yep. I feel like they had a bigger, higher upside version of this player available at #23, but opted for a smaller, lower upside player to add #58 overall and a guy that is right handed.Solberg was the kind of D 90% of the board yearns for and the trade back value we got was the same price we paid for 3 months of Edmundson or Lyubushkin. Maybe Wes hit another home run and he ends up better than Stian, not gonna complain about the player.
Gudas is 6' and 208lbs. I'm not worried about his size. That's a decent build and he might still grow an inch or 2He's 6'1, 190lbs. That's not "big" by NHL defenseman standards. That's very average size wise.
Let's just say she has options if the analytics company doesn't work out.She's a woman who runs the 2nd largest private NHL analytics company, it's terrible to put her worth based on her hotness.
Definitely don't google Meghan Chayka.
I didn't say it was a bad build, nor am I worried about his size. Morgs claimed that 6'1, 190lbs is big and I was just arguing that it's pretty average for an NHL D-man.Gudas is 6' and 208lbs. I'm not worried about his size. That's a decent build and he might still grow an inch or 2
I think the Leafs wanted Emery and thought they could move down to grab him only for the Rangers to take him a spot aheadFor the second year in a row, we take someone who wasn't projected to go in the 1st round. Cowan was expected to go somewhere in the 3rd, Danford in the 2nd However we hit a home run with Cowan so hopefully Wes knows what he's doing here. Wondering if he was our pick all along at 23 or if the guy we wanted was taken.
That's what I was thinking.I think the Leafs wanted Emery and thought they could move down to grab him only for the Rangers to take him a spot ahead
One thing is for sure, Treliving stared at his phone until the last second hoping for a call that would allow him to trade down further. He clearly knew that Danford was a reach at #31 and could be had later and was hoping (presumably) to trade down again for more draft capital. I don't they're thrilled to have made that pick where they did.I think the Leafs wanted Emery and thought they could move down to grab him only for the Rangers to take him a spot ahead
Not sure if serious. It was a joke.She's a woman who runs the 2nd largest private NHL analytics company, it's terrible to put her worth based on her hotness.
Definitely don't google Meghan Chayka.
Better defender is questionable to me. I've watched enough Gens games this year to see him progress but I would be stunned if we was more than a 3rd pairing guy. You are right though. We do need guys who can defend and make a first pass. Which is why I wanted Emery in the first place and would have been comfortable with taking him at 23.
Yep. I feel like they had a bigger, higher upside version of this player available at #23, but opted for a smaller, lower upside player to add #58 overall and a guy that is right handed.
I hope the kid proves me wrong and becomes a prime TJ Brodie / Matt Roy / Marc Methot type that insulates a #1 D-man for 5+ years... But right now I'm underwhelmed. Any time the GM
Starts imediately talking about character and handedness, rather than skill or an elite trait, it gives me pause for concern.
Rather have traded this pick for tanev or zadorov at the deadline.There are many who believe he’s going to make a solid third-pairing NHL defenseman someday."
I added to your joke, friend.Not sure if serious. It was a joke. Take the stick out.
It's hardly a good pick at 58.
Agreed. He's an elite defensive center who has very nice playmaking skills but needs more finishers on his team.Ollie Josephson would be a nice pick at 57.
Yeah, I read it too fast my bad. I tried to ninja edit.I added to your joke, friend.
The other two people who quoted me seemed to understand that.
I don't mind the player either, but my take is this. After they traded out of the #23 spot and got a second round pick, I think they targeted Danford, but knew they could get him in the second round. They were trying to trade down again to acquire another 2nd round pick, that would have given them 3 2nds. They never got the call and got their hand caught in the cookie jar, tying them to Danford at #31, probably 8-10 picks higher than they wanted to draft him and they didn't get the extra pick they coveted.I don’t mind the player it’s just the argument that we NEEDED to trade down because we have no picks, we got less value than either one of Edmundson/Lyubushkin cost. You can’t say we’re so desperate for picks we need to trade down from a great fit at 23 and at the same time rent 2 bottom pairing defensemen for twice the value we got from trading down. If we’re going for it we need the best shot at an impact player ASAP, if we’re not going for it and retooling with longterm projects we have no business renting #6/7 D.
It’s the constant half measures with this team, we have one foot on two trains going opposite directions.
Good skater and playmaker and already really good defensively. If he can be a Plekanek type of player that's a win in my book.Agreed. He's an elite defensive center who has very nice playmaking skills but needs more finishers on his team.
Yeah, I read it too fast my bad. I tried to ninja edit.
Most prospects have question marks surrounding their game but it depends on how you see them growing. What can be taught, what can further be solidified. Truth be told, I wasn't a fan of Cowan but I've had a healthy dose of crow this past year. I truly hope that trend continues with this pick.They definitely gambled, Emery was probably their first choice but he got picked! So had to go to the next. Emery still has question marks in his game too