BondraTime
Registered User
It was 38th, 71st, and a 2025 2nd for Utah; Sens only sure pick in the next 2 drafts is that 2025 2nd, extremely hard to trade that away a year in advance for the Sens, especially when they don't have the 3rd to go with. Avs trading down with 71 to 76 and then reaching for Zellers tells me they were targetting him in the 3rd, was probably a pick they needed/wanted in return.Not hard to imagine they were high on Beaudoin given he checks a lot of boxes for them, and Seidel obviously had some actual insider info as a guy who works for the Colts, but there's a big difference between being interested in Beaudoin at 7 as the BPA if Yakemchuk was gone, and at say at 13 as a trade back target had we moved back with Philly (as was being rumoured prior to dumping Korpisalo on the Bruins).
If he was legitimately viewed as a top 10 pick we certainly would have offered the 39th pick + a fair bit more to jump up to take him, regardless of how few picks we have after Dorion's insane spending sprees. Doesn't guarantee we would have been able to outbid Utah, who have a massive warchest of picks to use thanks to the great work of Bill Armstrong, but Utah getting to move up for only the cost of a 3rd round pick implies not a lot of interest from us and other teams wanting to move up.
Then again the Hawks gave up pick #50 to move up 7 spots to #27 to take Vanacker right after it only cost Utah pick #71 to move up 15 spots to #24, so who the hell knows how much shopping around of pick #24 the Avs even did. Super weird deal for them to move down so much for so little.
I’m not sure Ottawa could have put together anything to move up with picks, they had 39, 104, and a 2025 2nd as the only picks available, that makes it even tougher to give up multiple picks with a depleted pool.
Agreed they weren’t taking him at 7 and he’d have been a guy they’d be looking at on a trade back to 9-13.
Last edited: