Alex1234
Registered User
- Oct 14, 2014
- 16,624
- 6,754
Such a rare commodity in the NHLThe first 3 RD gone by pick 8, the first of the big LD didn’t start until pick 10.
Even if its only to flip them for needs later we should stack on RDs
Such a rare commodity in the NHLThe first 3 RD gone by pick 8, the first of the big LD didn’t start until pick 10.
Yes i saw those articles as well. I wonder who the coach and GM will be? Have we heard yet?What is the likelihood that Yak plays for Team Canada at the upcoming WJC in Ottawa?
In looking at a couple of articles, it mentions that Bonk is the only returning D from the last WJC.
Then goes on to include Yak amongst Parekh, Dickinson, Dragicevic & Molendyk as possible options for this year's team. If that is the case, it will be interesting to see how he compares to Parekh & Dickinson in the tourney.
I like the pick. I had the feeling that if Iginla was off the board, they were definitely going with a RHD. So, it came down to Parekh v Yak.
Yak certainly seems to be more of what they were looking for:
- Size
- Skill
- Physical
- 2-Way
- Shot
From the interview with Staois, he referenced the term 'raw' when describing Yak, which tells me that they think there is the ability to work out his deficiencies (pivots, positioning, backward skating) and that he is a few years away.
That kind of thinking gets you JBD and Thomson.Such a rare commodity in the NHL
Even if its only to flip them for needs later we should stack on RDs
Obviously our scouts valued some traits higher than others. I'm thinking Size, Righty, Nasty/Physicality, SkillsThat kind of thinking gets you JBD and Thomson.
Pick the guy you think is BPA, from Staios' comments, sounds like we thought Yak was BPA by a wide margin
Dickinson has a low ceiling and plays the left side. If you draft him you're basically aiming to get a 3rd pairing dman with the 7th overall, because there's no chance in hell he ever plays over Chabot or Sanderson.Could have had either Dickenson or Parekh - both way better defencemen. Saw Parekh play live here in Ottawa and then watched him in the Mem Cup - this guy is going to be a stud.
There's been a lot of talk about wanting big, long D lately, as well as having D that can join the offense.Obviously our scouts valued some traits higher than others. I'm thinking Size, Righty, Nasty/Physicality, Skills
If rank the D with those attributes in mind as important .. He comes out on top
The only thing that makes sense to me is they were worried someone else was going to trade up with Philly to grab Buium.I found what Minnesota did was very interesting.
The Minnesota Wild acquired the No. 12 pick from the Philadelphia Flyers in exchange for the No. 13 pick and a third-round pick in the 2025 NHL Entry Draft. At No. 12, the Wild would select defenseman Zeev Buium from the University of Denver. So that’s a move that will merit some follow up.
Obviously.The only thing that makes sense to me is they were worried someone else was going to trade up with Philly to grab Buium.
I mean, that would have been true of Silayev, Buium, Parekh, Dickenson and probably Jiricek or Solberg too.He’s the best D, on draft day, the Sens have taken in the past 15 years other than Sanderson.
Re: boldedDickinson has a low ceiling and plays the left side. If you draft him you're basically aiming to get a 3rd pairing dman with the 7th overall, because there's no chance in hell he ever plays over Chabot or Sanderson.
Parekh will get absolutely bullied at the NHL. He already gets manhandled at times in the OHL, his lack of strength and speed will get him into issues in the NHL. Parekh also doesn't even skate the pick up the ice that much, so what are you even getting with him? A small dman who gets pushed around in his own end, can't breakout the puck on his own, but will be awesome on the PP? Real exciting.
It could be that. The Wild were certainly determined to get their guy.The only thing that makes sense to me is they were worried someone else was going to trade up with Philly to grab Buium.
By the time this year's crop of D picks are ready for top 4 roles, both Chabot and Zub could be gone, having depth to backfill is important, you look at TBL trading Drouin for Sergachev when they already had Hedman and McDonaugh for example.Re: bolded
If depends on whether you are looking at things through the lens of the current prism or the prism of the future. Dickinson could be our #2 LD and Chabot not even on team 4 (or 5) years from now.
With the rumour they almost went with Beaudoin and took Yak I think they were targeting toughness and grit more than pure BPA because Staios identified that particular weakness on his teamThat kind of thinking gets you JBD and Thomson.
Pick the guy you think is BPA, from Staios' comments, sounds like we thought Yak was BPA by a wide margin
I watched Parekh in the Championship game and he got clobbered by Landon Sim with an illegal hit to the head. After the hit he left the game and came back but he was not noticeable in that game. ( i think Parekh was injured but still played) Dickinson was better in that one game and it wasn't even close.Dickinson has a low ceiling and plays the left side. If you draft him you're basically aiming to get a 3rd pairing dman with the 7th overall, because there's no chance in hell he ever plays over Chabot or Sanderson.
Parekh will get absolutely bullied at the NHL. He already gets manhandled at times in the OHL, his lack of strength and speed will get him into issues in the NHL. Parekh also doesn't even skate the pick up the ice that much, so what are you even getting with him? A small dman who gets pushed around in his own end, can't breakout the puck on his own, but will be awesome on the PP? Real exciting.
I would have given up some flash and dash offensively to draft a D that's defense and skating combo projects higher than the others in the top 6.There's been a lot of talk about wanting big, long D lately, as well as having D that can join the offense.
I have concerns with Yak but that's true of a lot of prospects so pick your poison.
I find there's mixed opinions on his skating, the one positive on that front is there is room to improve his technique I guess...
In the Senators mind I doubt that but externally on lists sure. They were incredibly high on Chabot. At the time of drafting Sens clearly had Chabot well into their top 10 in one of the best drafts in years.I mean, that would have been true of Silayev, Buium, Parekh, Dickenson and probably Jiricek or Solberg too.
That kind of thinking gets you JBD and Thomson.
Pick the guy you think is BPA, from Staios' comments, sounds like we thought Yak was BPA by a wide margin
Well, don Boyd pretty much said the opposite, stating they go with their list. The rumour you're referencing stated themselves he wasn't confident in it, sounds more like that was the target at 25 had we kept the pick to me. Had they traded down (for example as a means to dump Korpisalo) maybe they are considering Beaudoin in the 12-15 range, but again, that could easily be their BPA in that range depending on how the draft played out. He was ranked 23rd in Mackenzies list in a year with very little consensus once you got out of the first half.With the rumour they almost went with Beaudoin and took Yak I think they were targeting toughness and grit more than pure BPA because Staios identified that particular weakness on his team
Yak might have been their BPA but Beaudoin wasn't for sure at 7
Anyway I think they hit pretty good with Yak
I'm unsure of what the Hitmen's junior cycle point is right now, but if they aren't looking to make a run he's going to be moved