Their skill levels compare, they are 366 days apart in age, both are highly skilled players. I would take Demidov over Michkov easily because of the way he plays, Michkov has a deadly shot much like Caufield's imo, Demidov has a good shot but using it more will help him in time plus once he gets stronger as it seems to have good weight behind it despite him not being strong yet.
I've got over 70 full games of Celebrini and Demidov, when you watch them imo you seee 2 highly skilled, very similar players. With Demidov it's all about what kind of physical progression can he have. The sky is the limit on his talent imo. That doesn't mean he will get close to reach that high of a level or he could end up being even better.
When talking about 17, 18, 19 year olds, anyone that thinks they know for sure what any prospect will turn into is so full of shit outside of the Crosby, McDavid's of the world as there are so many factors and variables involved, then add fans level of knowledge and understanding things will vary greatly among the experienced and inexperienced. The best scouts get it wrong all the time so what hope do we have?
You learn to look for things, doesn't mean it will go the way you think and you don't want to get carried away in either direction until you have see more of them but that can be hard as the very nature of prospects is based on hope and excitement for the future.
Demidov will be what he ends up being no matter what anyone thinks or says. Each of this kids will either progress or they won't and the reasons for both are so numerous, so many things could so easily go wrong or right. That's why I started my channel, so fans can see the good and the bad but also the progress or lack of and make up their own mind.
When talking about prospects I often think of a study I heard about in college so a long time ago and don't remember it exactly but it was for some class on crime where they got say 30 people in a room and then had someone walk into the room and rob the teacher of her purse or something and then ran out of the room. Then each person had to give a statement on what they saw like it was a police report, what where they wearing, how tall, what color skin (this was from the 70's) etc.. Just about every single one of them said something different. He wore a red hat, others would say he didn't have a hat, how the f*** can that even happen? But it just shows that a bunch of scouts could watch a prospect and each see something different, I guess that's why they say opinions are like assholes, everyone's got one. We can all say whatever but in the end it only matters what they do,