Why I really liked this pick, might be the steal of the draft.
Yeah but judging from the Nikishin threads we have to completely tamper expectations because he's EuropeanWhat if this kid turns into another Kirill the thrill? A man can dream?
Lol, seriously. Everyone knew Kaprizov was gonna be incredible in the NHL even before he got to the Wild, and he was. Nikishin I would actually say has been better all around in the K than Kaprizov was so the people doubting him and thinking he'll just be a 3rd pair physical guy in the NHL crack me up. Hopefully Artamonov continues this trajectory as he's looking exciting as hell too and like he could wind up being a prospect of that caliberYeah but judging from the Nikishin threads we have to completely tamper expectations because he's European
Yeah but prospects fail all the time. We aren't heavily questioning the ability of Canadian prospects because someone like Nugent-Hopkins didn't become the superstar that he was projected to be, and yet every time a top Euro isn't a superstar it's treated as some referendum on non-NA talent.You guys are weird. Nobody said Nikishin (or Artamonov) is guaranteed to fail. Nobody is rooting for him to fail. Nobody said he's only going to be a third pairing guy forever. But Kaprizov is not the only example of one of the best players outside of the NHL to ever come over. Some of them have failed entirely and plenty of others have not lived up to the height of their expectations. Both of them might be superstars, but it's also not a guarantee no matter how good they look over there.
50 KHL points at 19 years,1 month old? Not too shabby
I don't disagree that Europeans and Russians face biases more, but I can think of plenty of biases that are similar for guys that played in Canadian Junior or NCAA or that follow them all the way up through the minors and NHL. And most prospects have plenty of uncertainty baked into their conversation.Yeah but prospects fail all the time. We aren't heavily questioning the ability of Canadian prospects because someone like Nugent-Hopkins didn't become the superstar that he was projected to be, and yet every time a top Euro isn't a superstar it's treated as some referendum on non-NA talent.
Nikishin is an elite prospect, and it's looking like so is Arty. Hedging failure in their careers or projecting them to be disappointments because of those who came before is a little BS in my opinion, especially when our own scouts are incredibly high on at least Nik.
There’s a difference between “thinking he’s a third pair guy” and “I’m not going to go overboard and just be happy we’re getting at least a third pair guy, and then be really happy when they are more”. I feel like you think you’re in a battle or something. There’s nothing wrong with not making huge predictions and just being happy we have a good prospect on the way. You want to go really strong with it. Cool. Mocking people who just want to be realistic until we know and see more seems like an interesting approach when we’re all on the same side.Lol, seriously. Everyone knew Kaprizov was gonna be incredible in the NHL even before he got to the Wild, and he was. Nikishin I would actually say has been better all around in the K than Kaprizov was so the people doubting him and thinking he'll just be a 3rd pair physical guy in the NHL crack me up. Hopefully Artamonov continues this trajectory as he's looking exciting as hell too and like he could wind up being a prospect of that caliber
Zac Boychuk was a sick junior player with tons of highlight reel plays, and many of us thought he’d be the poo.I don't disagree that Europeans and Russians face biases more, but I can think of plenty of biases that are similar for guys that played in Canadian Junior or NCAA or that follow them all the way up through the minors and NHL. And most prospects have plenty of uncertainty baked into their conversation.
Good points. I’d add we could use one more middle six guy right now.There’s a difference between “thinking he’s a third pair guy” and “I’m not going to go overboard and just be happy we’re getting at least a third pair guy, and then be really happy when they are more”. I feel like you think you’re in a battle or something. There’s nothing wrong with not making huge predictions and just being happy we have a good prospect on the way. You want to go really strong with it. Cool. Mocking people who just want to be realistic until we know and see more seems like an interesting approach when we’re all on the same side.
Artamonov is scoring which is great, but his best skill is still the motor and the forechecking. He isn’t dangling and scoring ridiculous highlight reel goals - he’s burying good chances and has chemistry with linemates. I would absolutely take the same stance with him. We took him for the motor and that should translate. He was thought to be a likely middle six forward, and I’ll be pumped if he’s that. Not disappointed because this years production didn’t lead to him being Kaprizov 2.0.
I agree. I don’t think anyone has said these guys won’t or can’t get there.2 things can be true at once:
1) the path these guys are taking is the one they'd need to take to become superstars
2) there is a long way to go for either of these guys to become superstars
That's literally all we need in a guy. Someone who has a motor, finds the right spot, and buries chances when the puck ends up on his stick. Probably the single biggest missing piece we have right now, to be honest. Roslovic, at the beginning of the year when he scored on almost everything that touched his stick, showed what a player like that can mean for us. If that's all that Arty brings, it completely changes our prospects offensively going forward.Artamonov is scoring which is great, but his best skill is still the motor and the forechecking. He isn’t dangling and scoring ridiculous highlight reel goals - he’s burying good chances and has chemistry with linemates.
That's literally all we need in a guy. Someone who has a motor, finds the right spot, and buries chances when the puck ends up on his stick. Probably the single biggest missing piece we have right now, to be honest. Roslovic, at the beginning of the year when he scored on almost everything that touched his stick, showed what a player like that can mean for us. If that's all that Arty brings, it completely changes our prospects offensively going forward.
He was a great pick from the get go. “Safe” in that his floor seems to be something we could really use, but it’s hard to say what the ceiling is so maybe he’s way more - he’s got room to grow which makes it a real good pick to me. He could be Martinook or Carrier….but he could end up with more scoring like a Ruutu. That would be a pretty amazing pick in the second round. If he’s “just” a Martinook that’s still a hell of a second rounder in my book.That's literally all we need in a guy. Someone who has a motor, finds the right spot, and buries chances when the puck ends up on his stick. Probably the single biggest missing piece we have right now, to be honest. Roslovic, at the beginning of the year when he scored on almost everything that touched his stick, showed what a player like that can mean for us. If that's all that Arty brings, it completely changes our prospects offensively going forward.
I mean hell, if we have a Martinook with a legit scoring touch that's a huge need filled for the franchise.He was a great pick from the get go. “Safe” in that his floor seems to be something we could really use, but it’s hard to say what the ceiling is so maybe he’s way more - he’s got room to grow which makes it a real good pick to me. He could be Martinook or Carrier….but he could end up with more scoring like a Ruutu. That would be a pretty amazing pick in the second round. If he’s “just” a Martinook that’s still a hell of a second rounder in my book.
@MinJaBen - you beat me to it with Martinook.
Well at some point, Marty is going to age out. But, I’m hopeful Arty will deliver more.Sounds like a Martinook clone more than a Kaprizov.
If Rod were coaching a team of 12 Martinook clones as forwards, I bet they take at least half of the games played against the current team.He was a great pick from the get go. “Safe” in that his floor seems to be something we could really use, but it’s hard to say what the ceiling is so maybe he’s way more - he’s got room to grow which makes it a real good pick to me. He could be Martinook or Carrier….but he could end up with more scoring like a Ruutu. That would be a pretty amazing pick in the second round. If he’s “just” a Martinook that’s still a hell of a second rounder in my book.
@MinJaBen - you beat me to it with Martinook.
2 things can be true at once:
1) the path these guys are taking is the one they'd need to take to become superstars
2) there is a long way to go for either of these guys to become superstars
ehh man it's really not personal or a battle and I guess it's more of a reaction to the takes (there are not many but they are out there, not just here but outside of HF too) that we should trade Nikishin than people who want us to keep him but are just tempering expectations. It's a hockey message board and we talk hockey and players, prospect, etc. I have pretty strong opinions about Nikishin so I share them. Maybe I wind up wrong, that happens more often than not lol and everyone is free to disagree. I don't think I've mocked anyone.There’s a difference between “thinking he’s a third pair guy” and “I’m not going to go overboard and just be happy we’re getting at least a third pair guy, and then be really happy when they are more”. I feel like you think you’re in a battle or something. There’s nothing wrong with not making huge predictions and just being happy we have a good prospect on the way. You want to go really strong with it. Cool. Mocking people who just want to be realistic until we know and see more seems like an interesting approach when we’re all on the same side.
Artamonov is scoring which is great, but his best skill is still the motor and the forechecking. He isn’t dangling and scoring ridiculous highlight reel goals - he’s burying good chances and has chemistry with linemates. I would absolutely take the same stance with him. We took him for the motor and that should translate. He was thought to be a likely middle six forward, and I’ll be pumped if he’s that. Not disappointed because this years production didn’t lead to him being Kaprizov 2.0.
Russian Pronger and now Kaprizov 2.0What if this kid turns into another Kirill the thrill? A man can dream?