I'm going to be honest- I think Mutryn might be a first rounder by the time all is said and done. Really good size/skating combo, better defensive game than any of his fellows, and the production is pretty good, especially per game. Could be my BC-homerness, but I like him and Hurlbert more than any of the other forwards on the squad as future NHL guys.
Team got destroyed 10-2 i think last night . Somebody on this board was saying heavy discussion of having just one u -18 team ? My view might make sense because picking kids coming from midget hockey which is very hard for lot of them on how they translate playing junior hockey .
The NTDP has a pretty insane track record of good NHL players. Every time I watch NHL games it feels like a new former NTDP kid is getting a callup. There's no reason to think players would start running away from the program.Relax, the team loses by huge margins in their U17 year every year. And this team is dealing with losing their best 1-3 players every game for the last month due to promotions.
NTDP isn’t cutting a team, nor is losing by this scoreline a worry. Go check previous years score lines. Nothing new.
Well back to you on the 4-6 kids that should have made the team, wouldn’t it be easier picking u - 18 watching all the kids play ushl their u -17 year . The program for top end kids easy picks but they miss out development and have completely wrong picks maybe 30-40% of the team . Imagine , Whytenbach , Moe , Sychora , Simpson , Kevan , Fiddler , Rombach- ect on that team .Relax, the team loses by huge margins in their U17 year every year. And this team is dealing with losing their best 1-3 players every game for the last month due to promotions.
NTDP isn’t cutting a team, nor is losing by this scoreline a worry. Go check previous years score lines. Nothing new.
Just think it would make the u -18 team dramatically better is the argument . It’s a 2 year contract so it’s just tough picking the right kids coming out of midgets . The program has been great but this would make it even better .Im so confused where this argument about getting rid of the U17 team is coming from. Theyve been getting the crapped kicked out of them in the USHL for years. That's kind of the whole point. Is this year a little worse than past years? Probably but down years happen. The WJC group who just won gold lost like 17 out of their last 22 games in the USHL in their U17 year. Where is this even coming from?
How would it make it better? The whole idea of the program is to develop players not about winning in the USHL. Just so I'm clear, you think players would develop more in their U17 year playing midget or for another USHL, NAHL, BCHL or CHL team than they would at the NTDP? I just can't disagree moreJust think it would make the u -18 team dramatically better is the argument . It’s a 2 year contract so it’s just tough picking the right kids coming out of midgets . The program has been great but this would make it even better .