Speculation: 2024/25 Trade Rumours, Speculation etc Thread

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
59,269
32,107
But why? They already know mo, berg fleury is better.

Well, they really don't know that. They don't know what they have in Heinola. I'm sure the the coaching staff has a better picture of him than we do. But it is still incomplete until they give him a better shot.

And it doesn't matter that Mo, Berg, Fleury is better because they are going to go with Mo, Berg, Stanley. Apparently they think they need his size more than they need a Dman who can keep up with the pace of play.
 

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,696
13,221
I don't see Sabres retaining.

I guess it comes down to the value you put on Cozens. Draft day value? 2 years ago NHL production value? Or the last 2 seasons of falling production value? I would want some good scouting reports on him before deciding. I've seen him described as a good 2 way player. If that is accurate it would make up for some missing scoring.

And of course what offers from other teams are you going to have to beat?
A big part of the deal is how much Buffalo would value DeMelo.
They have been in dire need of somebody to play with Dahlin and Power since they drafted them. DeMelo fits that bill.
Dahlin is a Norris trophy defenseman with the right partner.
Also, they can really use some vet second/third liners. Nino fits that bill and is on a pretty good contract.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

Adam da bomb

Registered User
May 1, 2016
13,382
10,538
Well, they really don't know that. They don't know what they have in Heinola. I'm sure the the coaching staff has a better picture of him than we do. But it is still incomplete until they give him a better shot.

And it doesn't matter that Mo, Berg, Fleury is better because they are going to go with Mo, Berg, Stanley. Apparently they think they need his size more than they need a Dman who can keep up with the pace of play.
Yes, but, then they don’t need to give a Heinola a shot, because they already love Stan and nothing will change that. It’s easier to convince myself Stan is good than convince coaches he is not.
 
Last edited:

Mortimer Snerd

You kids get off my lawn!
Sponsor
Jun 10, 2014
59,269
32,107
A big part of the deal is how much Buffalo would value DeMelo.
They have been in dire need of somebody to play with Dahlin and Power since they drafted them. DeMelo fits that bill.
Dahlin is a Norris trophy defenseman with the right partner.
Also, they can really use some vet second/third liners. Nino fits that bill and is on a pretty good contract.

Yeah, I don't think they value those 2 guys as highly as you think they do but I can't say that you are wrong.

Right now, we don't have a replacement for DeMelo. And I would hate to lose Nino. He has been a very good addition to the 3rd line. So maybe Buffalo sees that value in him too.

If I'm trading for Cozens I would prefer to use mainly futures. But that is probably not what Buffalo wants.
 

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,696
13,221
Yeah, I don't think they value those 2 guys as highly as you think they do but I can't say that you are wrong.

Right now, we don't have a replacement for DeMelo. And I would hate to lose Nino. He has been a very good addition to the 3rd line. So maybe Buffalo sees that value in him too.

If I'm trading for Cozens I would prefer to use mainly futures. But that is probably not what Buffalo wants.
Nah, they have more than they need.
They need NHL caliber vets.
They have a tendency to overpay their players as well.
Dahlin 11m, Cozens 50m over 7 years (same deal as KFC's), Power's 8.35m is bewildering...Skinner's 9m x 8 is another head-scratcher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

KingBogo

Admitted Homer
Nov 29, 2011
32,956
44,599
Winnipeg
A big part of the deal is how much Buffalo would value DeMelo.
They have been in dire need of somebody to play with Dahlin and Power since they drafted them. DeMelo fits that bill.
Dahlin is a Norris trophy defenseman with the right partner.
Also, they can really use some vet second/third liners. Nino fits that bill and is on a pretty good contract.
I doubt DeMelo waives his 10 team no trade clause to go to Buffalo, as you'd think they would be close to the top of it. The Jets would also never trade a player of theirs that signed with them as a UFA to stay with the organization. They have way too much loyalty to do something like that.
 

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,884
10,648
I doubt DeMelo waives his 10 team no trade clause to go to Buffalo, as you'd think they would be close to the top of it. The Jets would also never trade a player of theirs that signed with them as a UFA to stay with the organization. They have way too much loyalty to do something like that.
Fans can discuss it, but probabilities are that no core pieces or any current player on the Jets is getting traded.

Ehlers would be the only potential one, heading toward UFA, with not much likelihood of being re-signed, but it seems unlikely that the Jets coaches believe they are better without him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mortimer Snerd

10Ducky10

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 5, 2015
14,696
13,221
I doubt DeMelo waives his 10 team no trade clause to go to Buffalo, as you'd think they would be close to the top of it. The Jets would also never trade a player of theirs that signed with them as a UFA to stay with the organization. They have way too much loyalty to do something like that.
Not to mention we can't afford to trade a RHD.
 

raideralex99

Whiteout Is Coming.
Dec 18, 2015
5,436
11,361
West Coast
Are people watching demelo or basing all this on the first couple months when he was clearly injured...
Demelo is not a top 4 D he lacks toughest and is not a top puck carrier/skater like Josh and you need one of those trades to be a top 4 but hey he wanted to stay in Winnipeg so can't complain too much.
 

voyageur

Hockey fanatic
Jul 10, 2011
10,884
10,648
Demelo is not a top 4 D he lacks toughest and is not a top puck carrier/skater like Josh and you need one of those trades to be a top 4 but hey he wanted to stay in Winnipeg so can't complain too much.
It seems to work with him and Morrissey and Scheif's line from time to time, better than any other defensive combination, and De Melo is mostly the guy who holds the line, keeps pucks in front of him. Foot speed when the big guns aren't skating will get exposed, but for some reason this combination of defense and forwards is the best one the Jets have for generating goals. I'm sure the stats support this.

De Melo's a fringe top 4 player, but last year's regular season success was no fluke. I think it's chemistry that the Jets work on. What changed in the playoffs, and I am not sure who made the decision, was to match up Morrissey and Melo against Mackinnon with Lowry's line, and have Pionk and Dillon/Samberg behind Scheif's line. Neither combination was overly successful, and that may get revisited, but Samberg and Pionk are probably not the ideal shudown pair either, as Pionk is wildly variable in his outcomes. Maybe not physical enough either. Miller is physical, but not a puck mover. Or a regular special teams contributor, so he's another rung down.

I wonder if the Jets take a look at Ceci for the deadline. Probably not the same top 4 d-man who went to game 7 Conference final paired with Phaneuf in 2017, took a lot of heat last year for being a weaker link, with Nurse. But he's battled tested, can kill penalties well, which is a role Pionk hasn't excelled in for playoff time. And can move around the lineup more than Miller.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad