Injury Report: 2024-25 Sharks/Barracuda health

timorous me

Gristled Veteran
Apr 14, 2010
2,280
3,809
So he made a point of embarrassing Walman in public instead of keeping it in-house when he could have just said Walman was injured from the hit he took and dealt with the non-hockey stuff in-house?

Continue to be unimpressed with Warsofsky.
I'll cut Warsofsky some slack because this has all been handled very "rookie coach in charge for the first time at this level"--which is not to excuse how he's handled it but to say it's definitely been poor but we can only hope he learns from this.

The point was to publicly call out Wallman.
I am not a fan of that approach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,690
7,945
Nobody is above the team on a roster this shitty. If Walman broke team protocol he deserves to be called out and scratched for it. This isn't a Warsofsky thing, it's an every coach in the NHL thing. Just look at how the Kings handled Fiala in SJ a few weeks ago.
 

gaucholoco3

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
1,487
1,896
Apparently guys like Ferraro and Kunin are
People need to understand Walman being scratched has nothing to do with his on ice play. He clearly did something that was serious enough that required a benching.

Ferraro and Kunin are not breaking team rules.
 

CupfortheSharks

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 31, 2008
2,890
1,781
San Jose
Nobody is above the team on a roster this shitty. If Walman broke team protocol he deserves to be called out and scratched for it. This isn't a Warsofsky thing, it's an every coach in the NHL thing. Just look at how the Kings handled Fiala in SJ a few weeks ago.
I learned many years ago as a young manager that you praise in public and criticize in private. Warsofsky could have easily sent Walman the same message by sitting him without making it so public.
 

gaucholoco3

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
1,487
1,896
I learned many years ago as a young manager that you praise in public and criticize in private. Warsofsky could have easily sent Walman the same message by sitting him without making it so public.
The message was intended for the locker room and not Walman. I’m sure if it was an issue that didn’t apply to the rest of the team it would have been dealt with privately.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,690
7,945
I learned many years ago as a young manager that you praise in public and criticize in private. Warsofsky could have easily sent Walman the same message by sitting him without making it so public.
What else was Warso supposed to say to explain why Walman wasn't going to be in the lineup on Tuesday? I don't think he should have lied and claimed Walman was too injured to play when that apparently wasn't the case. Warso kept it to a vague "coach's decision" until he was asked again and we still don't know the specifics.
 

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,455
5,374
What else was Warso supposed to say to explain why Walman wasn't going to be in the lineup on Tuesday? I don't think he should have lied and claimed Walman was too injured to play when that apparently wasn't the case. Warso kept it to a vague "coach's decision" until he was asked again and we still don't know the specifics.
"Coach's decision related to the injury." Best of all worlds, shows that Warso overruled Walman, sends the message publicly to the locker room if that was needed, but doesn't create more threads that Sheng & Co & Fans want to pull on.
 

CupfortheSharks

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 31, 2008
2,890
1,781
San Jose
What else was Warso supposed to say to explain why Walman wasn't going to be in the lineup on Tuesday? I don't think he should have lied and claimed Walman was too injured to play when that apparently wasn't the case. Warso kept it to a vague "coach's decision" until he was asked again and we still don't know the specifics.
He could have just said it was a maintenance day. That could mean almost anything.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,690
7,945
He could have just said it was a maintenance day. That could mean almost anything.
I've never heard of a player being scratched due to maintenance. I feel like this would have invited more suspicion.

"Coach's decision related to the injury." Best of all worlds, shows that Warso overruled Walman, sends the message publicly to the locker room if that was needed, but doesn't create more threads that Sheng & Co & Fans want to pull on.
Sounds like it wasn't injury related though. "We're about the team and getting better as an organization, our culture, our standards" is a pretty damning indictment. We'll likely never know what happened but IMO there's too much smoke around Walman being addicted to Fortnite/video games to ignore.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,474
15,160
Folsom
So he made a point of embarrassing Walman in public instead of keeping it in-house when he could have just said Walman was injured from the hit he took and dealt with the non-hockey stuff in-house?

Continue to be unimpressed with Warsofsky.
Until we know what that reason is, we can't really say if any of this is or isn't justified. Warsofsky is still young and inexperienced relatively speaking. He's going to need to legitimize himself in certain ways as a coach that the players aren't always going to like. He may also make mistakes during this process. I'm just saying that we're legitimately rebuilding the franchise at every level with someone inexperienced that we're counting on making good decisions consistently but not perfectly.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad