Injury Report: 2024-25 Sharks/Barracuda health

timorous me

Gristled Veteran
Apr 14, 2010
2,335
3,888
So he made a point of embarrassing Walman in public instead of keeping it in-house when he could have just said Walman was injured from the hit he took and dealt with the non-hockey stuff in-house?

Continue to be unimpressed with Warsofsky.
I'll cut Warsofsky some slack because this has all been handled very "rookie coach in charge for the first time at this level"--which is not to excuse how he's handled it but to say it's definitely been poor but we can only hope he learns from this.

The point was to publicly call out Wallman.
I am not a fan of that approach.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,794
8,066
Nobody is above the team on a roster this shitty. If Walman broke team protocol he deserves to be called out and scratched for it. This isn't a Warsofsky thing, it's an every coach in the NHL thing. Just look at how the Kings handled Fiala in SJ a few weeks ago.
 

gaucholoco3

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
1,506
1,927
Apparently guys like Ferraro and Kunin are
People need to understand Walman being scratched has nothing to do with his on ice play. He clearly did something that was serious enough that required a benching.

Ferraro and Kunin are not breaking team rules.
 

CupfortheSharks

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 31, 2008
2,892
1,787
San Jose
Nobody is above the team on a roster this shitty. If Walman broke team protocol he deserves to be called out and scratched for it. This isn't a Warsofsky thing, it's an every coach in the NHL thing. Just look at how the Kings handled Fiala in SJ a few weeks ago.
I learned many years ago as a young manager that you praise in public and criticize in private. Warsofsky could have easily sent Walman the same message by sitting him without making it so public.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hawkeye8

gaucholoco3

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
1,506
1,927
I learned many years ago as a young manager that you praise in public and criticize in private. Warsofsky could have easily sent Walman the same message by sitting him without making it so public.
The message was intended for the locker room and not Walman. I’m sure if it was an issue that didn’t apply to the rest of the team it would have been dealt with privately.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,794
8,066
I learned many years ago as a young manager that you praise in public and criticize in private. Warsofsky could have easily sent Walman the same message by sitting him without making it so public.
What else was Warso supposed to say to explain why Walman wasn't going to be in the lineup on Tuesday? I don't think he should have lied and claimed Walman was too injured to play when that apparently wasn't the case. Warso kept it to a vague "coach's decision" until he was asked again and we still don't know the specifics.
 

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,563
5,648
What else was Warso supposed to say to explain why Walman wasn't going to be in the lineup on Tuesday? I don't think he should have lied and claimed Walman was too injured to play when that apparently wasn't the case. Warso kept it to a vague "coach's decision" until he was asked again and we still don't know the specifics.
"Coach's decision related to the injury." Best of all worlds, shows that Warso overruled Walman, sends the message publicly to the locker room if that was needed, but doesn't create more threads that Sheng & Co & Fans want to pull on.
 

CupfortheSharks

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 31, 2008
2,892
1,787
San Jose
What else was Warso supposed to say to explain why Walman wasn't going to be in the lineup on Tuesday? I don't think he should have lied and claimed Walman was too injured to play when that apparently wasn't the case. Warso kept it to a vague "coach's decision" until he was asked again and we still don't know the specifics.
He could have just said it was a maintenance day. That could mean almost anything.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,794
8,066
He could have just said it was a maintenance day. That could mean almost anything.
I've never heard of a player being scratched due to maintenance. I feel like this would have invited more suspicion.

"Coach's decision related to the injury." Best of all worlds, shows that Warso overruled Walman, sends the message publicly to the locker room if that was needed, but doesn't create more threads that Sheng & Co & Fans want to pull on.
Sounds like it wasn't injury related though. "We're about the team and getting better as an organization, our culture, our standards" is a pretty damning indictment. We'll likely never know what happened but IMO there's too much smoke around Walman being addicted to Fortnite/video games to ignore.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DG93

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,621
15,324
Folsom
So he made a point of embarrassing Walman in public instead of keeping it in-house when he could have just said Walman was injured from the hit he took and dealt with the non-hockey stuff in-house?

Continue to be unimpressed with Warsofsky.
Until we know what that reason is, we can't really say if any of this is or isn't justified. Warsofsky is still young and inexperienced relatively speaking. He's going to need to legitimize himself in certain ways as a coach that the players aren't always going to like. He may also make mistakes during this process. I'm just saying that we're legitimately rebuilding the franchise at every level with someone inexperienced that we're counting on making good decisions consistently but not perfectly.
 

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,563
5,648
I've never heard of a player being scratched due to maintenance. I feel like this would have invited more suspicion.


Sounds like it wasn't injury related though. "We're about the team and getting better as an organization, our culture, our standards" is a pretty damning indictment. We'll likely never know what happened but IMO there's too much smoke around Walman being addicted to Fortnite/video games to ignore.
I find it far more likely that (as I posted elsewhere) it's how Walman handled the hit, versus some video game theory.

Walman said "it's not NOT the injury, we wouldn't be here if not for the Boeser hit" just after Warso said "it's not injury related." Then Warso said "it's not hockey play related" which nuked all the people saying he got benched for mistakes on ice (I believe you were one of them).

So therefore it's likely about how Walman handled getting hit. We won't know the details but my theory is a) lied about how bad it was which puts himself before team and certainly didn't help him play well, b) did something during treatment that wasn't cool, be it treating training staff well, or PEDs, or who knows. Any of those things are far more likely to me than him playing too many video games, but it's certainly possible I guess.
 

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
16,835
6,319
I learned many years ago as a young manager that you praise in public and criticize in private. Warsofsky could have easily sent Walman the same message by sitting him without making it so public.
Great point for most people. Professional sports is a different beast, where Walman makes 10x his managers.
 

Sharksrule04

Registered User
Jul 23, 2010
3,710
1,259
New York, NY
Yeah. They say it's supposed to be minor, but he's missed almost a month now. Feels eerily similar to last year.
Frustrating. I've liked him in the small doses I've seen but he can't seem to put a healthy stretch together following that first season in the AHL.
 

LadyStanley

Registered User
Sep 22, 2004
111,025
23,372
Sin City

Paywall. Chicago's Connor Murphy details his experience (mild) with Ostetis Pubis compared to Couture (severe).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad