All The Kings Men
Registered User
- Apr 7, 2016
- 2,366
- 5,629
thanks for listening to All The Kings MenI wonder which player Blake was going to draft before he was talked out of it and chose Clarke.
thanks for listening to All The Kings MenI wonder which player Blake was going to draft before he was talked out of it and chose Clarke.
I remember Clarke being a guy they had tabs on for a long time. Wallstedt is the only other name Ive heard from that draft that they were in on. Also think I remember hearing they thought Eklund may fall to them if Clarke didnt.
I think there has been publications saying Blake had a say in the high picks from those retool years. The picks after the lottery ones he relies on his scouts and doesnt know as much about the players but gives direction on things like position,size,etc.
It's pretty common practice for GMs to make the ultimate choice with first-round picks. They'll travel and scout the potential first-rounders, particularly top-10 picks. They don't have the bandwidth to travel all over and watch all the place to have a strong personal opinion for picks in rounds 2-7.
It's the hitting on later round picks that really define how good a scouting staff is. Yannetti and Co. are great at finding NHLers like Laferriere, Spence, Faber, etc. Which is why I'd run through a wall to keep the amateur scouting staff.
Blake definitely deserves credit for the top picks. I love the Turcotte, Byfield, and Clarke picks. But I also think it's fair to say that his best moves in the later rounds is to let the scouts do their thing.
I understand your point about giving credit where it's due, but I think until Blake gets this team beyond the first round, his body of work makes it harder to give him full credit.
I debated responding because it feels a little redundant, but when discussing Laf specifically, It's as simple as knowing rounds 2-7 is primarily Yannetti and his team. "Blake gets NO credit" could be hyperbolic you could argue, but there are things I am willing to give him credit for, and things I am not. Drafting past the first round isn't typically one of them, due to the talent of the amateur scouting department, and the Kings draft pecking order.Ok, so Blake chose Byfield, Turcotte, but didn't choose the other players that were drafted? I mean that's the logic you are going with. Who is to say that the scouting department didn't want to pick Joustin Sourdif, and Blake over ruled them there? Or Cade Webber, and Blake said no, we are going with Spence?
I'm just saying it's a bit...ludicrous to blame anyone....Blake, Lombardi, the man on the moon, for all failures, but then refuse to give credit for the successes....it's either all or none.
Do I believe Blake has f***ed up some drafts, absolutely (Turcotte over Zegras isn't one of them though) Zegras is a f***ing shitstorm of whatever the hell that is over there....but if I'm willing to say he f***ed up, then I'm sure as shit willing to say he has hit on picks as well.
Why aren't you?
Agreed. I like Turcotte. If you listen to some Ducks fans today they'll tell you Zegras was returning to form before he got hurt, but idk. Character stuff is ?. Just happy Turcotte is back in the conversation again.Blake still might have gotten that one right.
Exactly.It's pretty common practice for GMs to make the ultimate choice with first-round picks. They'll travel and scout the potential first-rounders, particularly top-10 picks. They don't have the bandwidth to travel all over and watch all the place to have a strong personal opinion for picks in rounds 2-7.
It's the hitting on later round picks that really define how good a scouting staff is. Yannetti and Co. are great at finding NHLers like Laferriere, Spence, Faber, etc. Which is why I'd run through a wall to keep the amateur scouting staff.
Blake definitely deserves credit for the top picks. I love the Turcotte, Byfield, and Clarke picks. But I also think it's fair to say that his best moves in the later rounds is to let the scouts do their thing.
I understand your point about giving credit where it's due, but I think until Blake gets this team beyond the first round, his body of work makes it harder to give him full credit.
Bruh, everyone knows I’m @Surf Nutz and I post here all the time.
Yes, Yannetti made a great pick on FaberDo we get to include Brock Faber?
Blake has traded away the two best pick Yanetti picks in last 7 years, Faber and Vilardi.Yes, Yannetti made a great pick on Faber
Indeed two horrible trades by Blake -- setting the franchise back a few steps.Blake has traded away the two best pick Yanetti picks in last 7 years, Faber and Vilardi.
Blake became GM shortly before the 2017 draft. So I don't know if he scouted the players extensively the same he could/would have since.Indeed two horrible trades by Blake -- setting the franchise back a few steps.
But did Yannetti make the GV pick or Blake? I would think that pick was Blake making the decision. But i honestly don't recall now.
I thought every good player drafted is the choice of anyone other than Blake?Indeed two horrible trades by Blake -- setting the franchise back a few steps.
But did Yannetti make the GV pick or Blake? I would think that pick was Blake making the decision. But i honestly don't recall now.
Face offs, Blake can get the occasional win & still be terrible. (Can win 40% of faceoffs & suck)I thought every good player drafted is the choice of anyone other than Blake?
If Clarke was good enough you'd know Blake would have immediately traded him for Heatley.
We didn't have enough picks to add.If Clarke was good enough you'd know Blake would have immediately traded him for Heatley.
It's a real travesty how far the US grade school education system has fallen and the lack of reading comprehension of those coming out of it have become.I thought every good player drafted is the choice of anyone other than Blake?