2024-25 San Diego Gulls/Tulsa Oilers

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
18,991
14,173
southern cal
The Gulls have allowed nearly 4 goals a night, tied for last in total concessions with 58. Just to put that in perspective, other than Bridgeport, every other team who has scored at least 46 goals (the Gulls are right at that number, tied for 12th in the AHL) are .500 or better; San Diego is 4-10. They really miss Suchanek

That would be the same fate for the Ducks if it weren't for Dostal and Gibby.
 

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,089
6,002
Visit site
Pointless streaks:
Gaucher 12 games
Myatovic 10 games

Both are neck and neck with offensive dynamo Noah Warren to see who will be the first to reach 2 points this year. Banish them to Tulsa where they belong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AngelDuck and Kalv

mightyquack

eggplant and jade or bust
Apr 28, 2010
26,765
6,005
Pointless streaks:
Gaucher 12 games
Myatovic 10 games

Both are neck and neck with offensive dynamo Noah Warren to see who will be the first to reach 2 points this year. Banish them to Tulsa where they belong.
Myatovic has been bad and should be in Juniors, which I've said from the first few games of the season.

Gaucher has been playing well outside of offensive production, but is also playing a pretty specific shutdown role on the Gulls this season. He's never putting up huge point totals in the AHL (granted you want to see more then 1 point from him).

Warren has had a solid season to date for a rookie defenceman, and is our best hope of having another top 4 RHD (outside of Luneau).
 

WhatTheDuck

9 - 20 - 8
May 17, 2007
24,092
17,564
Worst Case, Ontario
Myatovic has been bad and should be in Juniors, which I've said from the first few games of the season.

Gaucher has been playing well outside of offensive production, but is also playing a pretty specific shutdown role on the Gulls this season. He's never putting up huge point totals in the AHL (granted you want to see more then 1 point from him).

Warren has had a solid season to date for a rookie defenceman, and is our best hope of having another top 4 RHD (outside of Luneau).

Your point on Gaucher is valid, however it's still quite concerning that he's failing to produce at all right now. Even a borderline NHL talent (which Gaucher should at least be close to by now) ought to be able to put up middle six type numbers in the AHL, historically speaking.

He's never going to be an offensive guy, but a forward with NHL tools and a year in the AHL already under his belt - should be pacing for around 30-40 points at minimum, or the alarm bells start to ring.

It's still fairly early, hopefully he can string some points together here soon. I hated that we didn't get anything higher ceiling out of that trade at the time and still despise it though.
 

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,089
6,002
Visit site
Myatovic has been bad and should be in Juniors, which I've said from the first few games of the season.

Gaucher has been playing well outside of offensive production, but is also playing a pretty specific shutdown role on the Gulls this season. He's never putting up huge point totals in the AHL (granted you want to see more then 1 point from him).

Warren has had a solid season to date for a rookie defenceman, and is our best hope of having another top 4 RHD (outside of Luneau).
To clarify, I've no problem with Warren. My point was meant to be that both Warren and Gaucher each have one point this year. That is 100% an indictment of Gaucher. Sorry that I didn't make that clearer.

There are no excuses for Gaucher this year. Jim Johnson (Director of Player Development) said that we would see a "whole different" Gaucher this year now that he is healthy. I don't think he meant we'd see a zero offense 4th line AHL player. I've been very down on him as a player since I actually started watching him play when he was in junior. Nothing he has done since then has changed my mind. It is looking like a terrible waste of a 1st round pick at this point.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv and AngelDuck

Hey234

Registered User
Sponsor
May 7, 2010
906
1,324
Southern California
To clarify, I've no problem with Warren. My point was meant to be that both Warren and Gaucher each have one point this year. That is 100% an indictment of Gaucher. Sorry that I didn't make that clearer.

There are no excuses for Gaucher this year. Jim Johnson (Director of Player Development) said that we would see a "whole different" Gaucher this year now that he is healthy. I don't think he meant we'd see a zero offense 4th line AHL player. I've been very down on him as a player since I actually started watching him play when he was in junior. Nothing he has done since then has changed my mind. It is looking like a terrible waste of a 1st round pick at this point.


From an alternative perspective, Vatrano scored 32 goals last season and this year he has 2. Which is the real Vatrano? For Gaucher, many here believed he played well enough in the preseason to potentially earn a 4th line spot. Roughly 20 games later, he's a busy and waste of a 1st round pick. Which is the real Gaucher?

Development is not linear. Sometimes players take big jumps, sometimes they don't. That doesn't mean he's useless. There will most likely be players drafted later that him that become better players. But that's true of literally every single team. It is not an indictment of the scouts drafting. Maybe we let a 21 year old develop more before drawing conclusions of "terrible waste".
 

AngelDuck

Rak 'em up
Jun 16, 2012
23,746
18,164
Using points as the only evaluation tool for a player that’s being groomed to be a physical bottom sixer that kills penalties is confusing. A winning roster isn’t built with nothing but scoring skill guys.
that’s certainly true, but drafting Derek Grant in the 1st round isn’t how you build that winning roster: there has to be a middle ground here

I’m not sure how you can even be sure Gaucher has an NHL career at this point. He might carve out a role but it’s not like he’s a sure fire great 4th line center
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv and tomd

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,089
6,002
Visit site
When he was drafted, Gaucher was projected to be a middle six center who could possibly play on the 2nd line when needed.

Now he’s projected as a 4th line center with no offense.

I guess the good news is that he can’t go any lower in the lineup. The bad news is that he may not achieve even the current minimal expectations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv

All Mighty

Registered User
Sep 20, 2014
12,383
19,885
California
allmightyhockeytalk.com
When he was drafted, Gaucher was projected to be a middle six center who could possibly play on the 2nd line when needed.

Now he’s projected as a 4th line center with no offense.

I guess the good news is that he can’t go any lower in the lineup. The bad news is that he may not achieve even the current minimal expectations.
Ok man, we get it. You don’t have to say the same things over and over again. We all know how you feel and where you stand.
 

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
18,991
14,173
southern cal
Gaucher's threshold is to be Groulx or better. Both shutdown centers. Gaucher was drafted 22nd overall and Groulx was drafted 54th overall.

Groulx vGaucher
ProspectSeasonYearLeagueGamesGAPtsPPG.Plus/Minus
GroulxD + 02017-18QMJHL
68​
28​
27​
55​
0.81​
9​
GaucherD + 02021-22QMJHL
66​
31​
26​
57​
0.86​
30​
GroulxD + 12018-19QMJHL
65​
31​
49​
80​
1.23​
37​
GaucherD + 12022-23QMJHL
19​
13​
11​
24​
1.26​
15​
GroulxD + 22019-20QMJHL
57​
29​
49​
78​
1.37​
20​
GaucherD + 22023-24AHL
72​
10​
15​
25​
0.35​
1​
GroulxD + 32020-21AHL
42​
10​
19​
29​
0.69​
14​
GaucherD + 32024-25AHL
16​
0​
1​
1​
0.06​
-4​

Gaucher's offense is lagging behind Groulx at the moment. TBF, the 2020-21 Gulls were the 3rd best team in the Pacific, but Groulx was the Gulls' 3rd best scorer on the team with the highest +/- rating too.

It's still too early to tell about Gaucher. Although I wanted other more offensive players like Snuggerud or Kulich (who scored the game winner against the Ducks in OT last night), I am pulling for Gaucher to succeed to help the Ducks succeed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv

ZegrassyKnoll

Registered User
Dec 2, 2016
636
1,048
that’s certainly true, but drafting Derek Grant in the 1st round isn’t how you build that winning roster: there has to be a middle ground here

I’m not sure how you can even be sure Gaucher has an NHL career at this point. He might carve out a role but it’s not like he’s a sure fire great 4th line center
Only 65% of picks between 16-31 go on to play more than 99 NHL games. Grant played over 400 lol
 

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
18,991
14,173
southern cal
it’s fair to compliment Madden when he finds a Zellweger or Luneau or Colangelo and also fair to criticize him for a Mayatovic or Gaucher or Tracey

I wonder if our org did Tracey and Perreault wrong b/c both took huge steps forward in 2021-22, but degraded each consecutive season there after. We are currently talking about how Z might be broken offensively under Cronin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,089
6,002
Visit site
Ok man, we get it. You don’t have to say the same things over and over again. We all know how you feel and where you stand.
I’ve deliberately stayed away from talking about Gaucher after reading what Jim Johnson said about him over the summer. But it is now clear that something isn’t working. Both Gaucher and the organization should be embarrassed at his play so far this year. Verbeek wants accountability...well, so do I.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv

Hey234

Registered User
Sponsor
May 7, 2010
906
1,324
Southern California
When he was drafted, Gaucher was projected to be a middle six center who could possibly play on the 2nd line when needed.

Now he’s projected as a 4th line center with no offense.

I guess the good news is that he can’t go any lower in the lineup. The bad news is that he may not achieve even the current minimal expectations.

This is an expectation issue and not a Gaucher issue. Scouts, media, and fans put an unrealistic expectation on his potential. Essentially, he's not met those expectations yet so thus he's a failure and waste of a pick. If anyone is consistently expecting to get 2nd line centers from the bottom of the 1st round, then that's unrealistic from a statical standpoint. If the Ducks get a serviceable player from the later parts of the 1st, that's a success, not a failure.

I’ve deliberately stayed away from talking about Gaucher after reading what Jim Johnson said about him over the summer. But it is now clear that something isn’t working. Both Gaucher and the organization should be embarrassed at his play so far this year. Verbeek wants accountability...well, so do I.

Why would the organization be embarrassed? A 1st round pick is playing in the AHL at 21. That's usually a good thing....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hockey Duckie

Deuce22

Registered User
Jun 17, 2013
5,953
8,437
SoCal & Idaho
that’s certainly true, but drafting Derek Grant in the 1st round isn’t how you build that winning roster: there has to be a middle ground here

I’m not sure how you can even be sure Gaucher has an NHL career at this point. He might carve out a role but it’s not like he’s a sure fire great 4th line center
Agree. My point wasn’t that Gaucher is a sure fire NHL player, but that points isn’t the only evidence of his development.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDonald19

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,089
6,002
Visit site
This is an expectation issue and not a Gaucher issue. Scouts, media, and fans put an unrealistic expectation on his potential. Essentially, he's not met those expectations yet so thus he's a failure and waste of a pick. If anyone is consistently expecting to get 2nd line centers from the bottom of the 1st round, then that's unrealistic from a statical standpoint. If the Ducks get a serviceable player from the later parts of the 1st, that's a success, not a failure.



Why would the organization be embarrassed? A 1st round pick is playing in the AHL at 21. That's usually a good thing....
When I have some more time I’ll go back and see what verbeek and madden said about him after he was drafted. I’m pretty sure I won’t find that they were hoping he’s turn into a zero offense 4C.

There are lots and lots of 21 year-olds playing in the AHL right now who will never sniff the NHL. Almost none of them were 1st round picks though.

Every fan base is guilty of overrating their prospects but at some point reality has to set in.
 

AngelDuck

Rak 'em up
Jun 16, 2012
23,746
18,164
Only 65% of picks between 16-31 go on to play more than 99 NHL games. Grant played over 400 lol
Yeah, if someone told me right now that Nathan Gaucher would have as good of a career as Derek Grant has had, I would take it.

That seems like his upside and I personally have a problem with that. To each their own
 

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,089
6,002
Visit site
Yeah, if someone told me right now that Nathan Gaucher would have as good of a career as Derek Grant has had, I would take it.

That seems like his upside and I personally have a problem with that. To each their own
The funny (or sad) thing is that I’ve been saying that Gaucher’s upside was Derek Grant since I started watching him. Unfortunately, that looks like the best case right now.
 

shach1

Registered User
Aug 12, 2023
98
113
Pointless streaks:
Gaucher 12 games
Myatovic 10 games


If these picks are busts, it shortens are cup window when Terry ages out of his prime in 2030 or 2031.

Missed out on Kulich who scored the gwg against us yesterday, Danila Yurov and Jimmy Snuggurud. 3 top forward prospects rn by drafting Gaucher.

You can get a 4th line C anywhere.

We passed on Andrew Cristal with taking Mayatovic.

Leading scorer in the WHL.

I don't know why you would ever draft a player who basically has a third line ceiling.

Those are the easiest guys to find in FA.


Ritche Tracy Perault Mayatovic Gaucher
 
  • Like
Reactions: ducknuts

Ad

Ad

Ad