2024-25 Roster Thread #2: Midseasonnar

Flyer lurker

Registered User
Feb 16, 2019
9,832
12,694
Acquiring elite talent through FA or trades is definitely Flyers.

This team can BS you all they want but they have always undervalued the draft. They fail at it for years, and don’t care to address the putrid scouting, or stupidity in willingly perpetually picking outside of the top picks.
There has to be some rh d-man we can acquire through over draft trading compensation.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,501
22,442
Good teams use all avenues to add talent.
The key is patience, don't make moves just to make moves.

I'd gladly trade a package of players and picks for a legitimate top 6 center 25 or under. Odds are they'll never have that opportunity, but if it arises . . .

They drafted badly from 2016-18, but not since then.
(5) 1sts, (5) 2nds, Frost and Farabee all they have to show for those three drafts, though they did nail Cates and Ersson in the 5th rounds (scout picks). Some bad luck, some bad picks.

(6) 1sts, (6) 2nds since Flahr took over, York, Brink, Foerster, Andrae, Gauthier/Drysdale, Michkov
Jury still out on Tuomaala, Bonk, Bjarnason, Jett, Berglund, Gill
later picks with a shot, Wisdom, Kolosov, McDonald, Zavragin, Barkey, Knuble, Ciernak, Sotheran, Rouhonen.

But as Hextall shows, takes about five years to get a good read.
Hextall looked very good after the 2014 and 2015 drafts, then . . .
 

kudymen

Hakstok was a fascist clique hiver lickballs.gif
Jun 18, 2011
23,107
44,843
Atlanta (Decatur)

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
131,027
172,369
Armored Train
Which tells me that they think they’re only missing one piece.

They’re going to send out the assets that are supposed to build with the quantity approach and then pay said person. Or they really do believe that they can package their middle of the pack first round picks for a top five pick which is never going to happen.

I will love to see who this player would be. I’m sure the scouts will nail it.

God help us.

It really is hilarious how they dont realize every position on this team is a need. You can always go BPA over fit because BPA will always be a fit. And they need to get talent in bulk, instead of plinking away one at a time in a slow Hextallian and never-ending cycle where no timelines mesh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BiggE

Flyerfan4life

Registered User
Jun 9, 2010
35,781
22,678
Richmond BC, Canada
It really is hilarious how they dont realize every position on this team is a need. You can always go BPA over fit because BPA will always be a fit. And they need to get talent in bulk, instead of plinking away one at a time in a slow Hextallian and never-ending cycle where no timelines mesh.
building from the 4th line up gets way better results..

oh wait...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tripod

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,501
22,442
They don't need quantity, they need quality.

Add Jett and another top 6 center, move Couts to LW and they're very deep at forward.
Frost, Cates, Jett, top 6 at center, Couts, Farabee, Tippett, Foerster, Michkov, TK, Brink,

Add a puck moving LHD to pair with Bonk and a stay at home LHD to replace Seeler and they're solid on defense.

And they're starting two young goalies with two more on the way.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: trostol

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
131,027
172,369
Armored Train
They don't need quantity, they need quality.

Add Jett and another top 6 center, move Couts to LW and they're very deep at forward.
Frost, Cates, Jett, top 6 at center, Couts, Farabee, Tippett, Foerster, Michkov, TK, Brink,

Add a puck moving LHD to pair with Bonk and a stay at home LHD to replace Seeler and they're solid on defense.

And they're starting two young goalies with two more on the way.

They need quantity and quality. You just described that, too.

JUST a top 6 center superior to Couturier, a hope that Jett also justifies taking Couturier out of C, two good dmen.

That's a lot.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
131,027
172,369
Armored Train
BTW, they do not need a stay at home dman. They need to upgrade on Seeler. Stay at home dmen are largely useless and a detriment now. Of course we have two, and both need to be upgraded. Quantity of quality is required. Especially because they will need multiple shots at achieving these things as not everything will pan out, and that's even assuming they suddenly stop being horrendous at development.

The reason Luke Schenn has stayed relevant so long is that he's worked with guys like Oates to expand his skillset beyond that.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,501
22,442
When I say "stay at home" there is always one D-man who tends to trail the play. You want him mobile enough to join the attack or get back, but there is only one puck. If you have a puck dominant offensive D-man, doesn't make sense to pair him with a similar player.

Bonk should fill that role, he's not an "end to end" guy, but if the defense swings toward say Andrae as the puck handling LHD, Bonk can sneak down the right side and score - "bumper Bonk" has shown he can shoot the puck. Otherwise, he's smart, good size, mobile enough to be a solid two way guy.

Same way for Drysdale to be effective he has to have the puck, and he can be more aggressive with a partner who can CYA for him. So you'd like someone like Seeler, but maybe bigger, faster and a bit more skilled.

Very few players can do everything well, and they tend to go at the top of the draft.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
131,027
172,369
Armored Train
When I say "stay at home" there is always one D-man who tends to trail the play. You want him mobile enough to join the attack or get back, but there is only one puck. If you have a puck dominant offensive D-man, doesn't make sense to pair him with a similar player.

Bonk should fill that role, he's not an "end to end" guy, but if the defense swings toward say Andrae as the puck handling LHD, Bonk can sneak down the right side and score - "bumper Bonk" has shown he can shoot the puck. Otherwise, he's smart, good size, mobile enough to be a solid two way guy.

Same way for Drysdale to be effective he has to have the puck, and he can be more aggressive with a partner who can CYA for him. So you'd like someone like Seeler, but maybe bigger, faster and a bit more skilled.

Very few players can do everything well, and they tend to go at the top of the draft.

This outdated role thinking is fatal to efficiency. There is only one puck. And sometimes the other dman has to handle it. If only one dman can do anything with it, that makes the opponent's life a lot easier than if both can make plays. Deliberately accepting a "stay at home" dman is shooting low.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad