2024-25 Roster Thread #2: Midseasonnar

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
A month or two before he was made GM he was on record saying he didn't think he was ready for the job.

He was right.
Not easy to find a gm willing to take the job while being subservient to such team building geniuses like Keith Jones and the God Emperor Tortorella. Oh, and as an added bonus, you will be saddled with the enormous weight that is Flahrsy the Hutt.
 
What does culture mean if all you're fostering is a team of losers who can't even make the playoffs? This whole organization is lost. Imagine investing and back an organization that doesn't care about winning as much as loyalty and culture. Flyers are about to be out of the the playoffs for the 5th straight time. Would be the 2nd time in their history (last time was 89-94), yet apparently this is OKAY!

Also, keep in mind, this is a club that won't draft BPA. They will only draft someone that fits the mold of what they want. This team is destined to fail.
 
Not easy to find a gm willing to take the job while being subservient to such team building geniuses like Keith Jones and the God Emperor Tortorella. Oh, and as an added bonus, you will be saddled with the enormous weight that is Flahrsy the Hutt.

At this point, can anyone provide a legitimate reason why DB was made GM instead of Flahr? Danny himself said he wasn't ready, Flahr is still right the hell there, they're both equally capable of letting Torts pull the strings, what would be materially different if they switched jobs? The only explanation I can think of is the PR of having a former player in charge again.
 
At this point, can anyone provide a legitimate reason why DB was made GM instead of Flahr? Danny himself said he wasn't ready, Flahr is still right the hell there, they're both equally capable of letting Torts pull the strings, what would be materially different if they switched jobs? The only explanation I can think of is the PR of having a former player in charge again.
Easier to market the beloved former player to the mouth breathing authentics than to market Cuck’s fat lackey.
 
At this point, can anyone provide a legitimate reason why DB was made GM instead of Flahr? Danny himself said he wasn't ready, Flahr is still right the hell there, they're both equally capable of letting Torts pull the strings, what would be materially different if they switched jobs? The only explanation I can think of is the PR of having a former player in charge again.

There's no mystery here. You nailed it. Beloved player. I don't think any old player would have worked the way they wanted. Most people loved him before he fell off a cliff at the end.
 


Probably tough to sell these guys are these high upside players under these circumstances. :laugh:

More like they have no plans for Bonk to run the PP, and they would have liked to see Luchanko with some offensively skilled wings getting real minutes rather than 4th line and PK duties.

They want to see players in roles that translate to the NHL for evaluation purposes.
I'm sure they're happy to have Barkey and Bonk on London, which is practically a pro program.
On the other hand, I suspect they were unhappy Jett wasn't traded to a better team.
 
@BigToe How reasonable/crazy would you call that best skater in the tournament statement? I know it's a nebulous term. Just looking for a rough idea. I know Catton played for example, so it got me curious.
 
  • Angry
Reactions: Magua


Probably tough to sell these guys are these high upside players under these circumstances. :laugh:


Bonk's projection is 2nd pairing. Luchanko's projection is middle six. Both scouting reports say they don't really have any elite skills that make them stand out.

I hope they become important players for the Flyers, but they are almost certainly not top of the lineup guys.
 
More like they have no plans for Bonk to run the PP, and they would have liked to see Luchanko with some offensively skilled wings getting real minutes rather than 4th line and PK duties.

They want to see players in roles that translate to the NHL for evaluation purposes.
I'm sure they're happy to have Barkey and Bonk on London, which is practically a pro program.
On the other hand, I suspect they were unhappy Jett wasn't traded to a better team.
But other coaches see them for what they are, nothing about Jett or Bonk suggest important offensive roles.

Canada were morons, but those 2 usage were from the biggest blunders.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BiggE
I don't think "blasted" is an accurate description, "disappointed" would be closer to the truth.

Bonk is a 2nd pair guy, which is fine where he was drafted, he's going to be a smart, physical (probably end up 6'2 220), CYA RHD who can pair with Andrae, York or Sanheim, or if they draft an offense first LHD this summer. If Andrae/Bonk is a solid top 4 line, they're in pretty good shape with Seeler/Drysdale as your 3rd pair.

I don't know how you project Jett, he's a season behind draft peers like Catton b/c he only played in the top 6 at 17. Playing for Guelph suppresses his scoring and his development, on say London, he's probably a 1.5+ ppg center. Problem is I don't see Guelph adding much forward talent next season, ideally they'd stash him in the AHL for a season, but that's not allowed.

Suzuki was the last big name out of Guelph:
2018-19: 59g 22-38 60 (ES), had Schnarr 22 ES goals, Ratcliffe 35 ES goals, Hawel 24 ES goals, Entwhistle 19
2022-23: Poitras 63g 14-40 54 (ES), Bowman 16 goals, Namestnikov 27,
2023-24: Jett 68g 16-23 39 (ES), Bowman 19 goals, Paquette 18, Karabela 10
2024-25: Jett 20g 8-12 20 (ES), [42g] Paquette 11 goals, Namestnikov 10, Snelgrove 8

Top OHL ES Scorers
Martone 32g 19-27 46 1.44
Rehkopf 32g 20-22 42 1.31
Greentree 43g 23-28 54 1.26
M Misa 38g 25-23 48 1.26
Protas 39g 22-26 48 1.23
L Misa 41g 19-27 46 1.12
Sennecke 37g 19-19 38 1.03
Roobreek 42g 22-21 43 1.02
Lardis 41g 24-17 41 1.00

Barkey 34g 7-22 29 0.85
 
@BigToe How reasonable/crazy would you call that best skater in the tournament statement? I know it's a nebulous term. Just looking for a rough idea. I know Catton played for example, so it got me curious.
I'm not the best at evaluating skating but I think Oliver Moore was the best skater at the tournament. Luchanko is probably close to the top but it's mostly his straight line skating. The only guy that popped up in my head as better other than Catton was Molendyk. @Magua is probably the better guy to ask.
 
Maybe because they just aren't as good as you idiots think, Danny.


They really are planning on building the franchise around these depth talents, aren't they?
The Flyer’s FO arguing with Hockey Canada over prospect usage is laughable.



I also heard that Briere said they aren’t shopping Risto but have received calls about him. Were the calls that he received from other teams saying not to even think of calling them to see if they’re interested in trading for Risto?
 
Maybe because they just aren't as good as you idiots think, Danny.


They really are planning on building the franchise around these depth talents, aren't they?

It’s so long down the list of issues with Team Canada’s thought process if it’s even there at all. If Canada truly picked the best players available Luchanko might not even be amongst that best 13 forwards or whatever let alone be someone pushing for more ice time. Bonk likely makes it but again if it was truly the best players selected he’s likely taking on a lesser role than what he played at that tournament.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad