He’s on the top pair in RockfordPhillips will likely be traded for another stalled mediocre prospect - there's not enough ice time in Rockford for him & he looks stale.
Ice time is no issue
He’s on the top pair in RockfordPhillips will likely be traded for another stalled mediocre prospect - there's not enough ice time in Rockford for him & he looks stale.
Too much cap space allocated to four forwards who don’t elevate their games in the playoffs is a huge reason they haven’t won a Cup.Eh, I don't think that's the main reason Matthews and Toronto haven't won a Cup.
If Bedard wants to go down the road of 4-5 year deals to maximize his earnings, who am I to judge?
Too much cap space allocated to four forwards who don’t elevate their games in the playoffs is a huge reason they haven’t won a Cup.
Their star players don’t play like stars and take over series. They take up too much cap space so the Leafs have always had to fill in their lack of depth with crappy players like a 41 year old Joe Thornton.That, but what might be even more of an issue is I don't think they've had the right coach with this core. Babcock was a lunatic and overrated as a coach. Keefe reminds me of a guy like McLellan who won't be able to get a great team over the hump. I'd imagine NJ has the same issue with him and their core while he's there, but we'll see.
Really interested to see what Toronto and this core can do with Berube. I think he's a really underrated coach.
Literally never been able to add to their defense group, and have been stuck bargain bin shopping for goalies and using retreads like Samsinov, Campbell, Murray, in hopes they turn it around while they are signed for cheap.Eh, I don't think that's the main reason Matthews and Toronto haven't won a Cup.
If Bedard wants to go down the road of 4-5 year deals to maximize his earnings, who am I to judge?
Kucherov, Point, Gourde, & Tyler Johnson of the multi Cup winning Lightning say hello. But yes we will need to surround them with some diversity in size and shape when filling out the lineup.Question for everybody;
Do you think it is feasible to roster all 3 of Bedard, Nazar, and Kantserov in the top 6 of our lineup?
I ask this because there has not been a single team in the history of the NHL that has had success rostering more than 2 under 5'10" players in their top 9 and none of these 3 are 3rd line players. Nazar and Bedard are top 6 or bust types. Kantserov is too talented for the 3rd line.
Then you factor in the size of the Hawks other top forwards sizes and you might realize the Hawks have a size issue in their roster construction. Building your team around small forwards can be dangerous
I really hope Dach becomes a top 6 guy or else this rebuild will heavily rely on free agents/trades for talented players with size that don't come around often
Question for everybody;
Do you think it is feasible to roster all 3 of Bedard, Nazar, and Kantserov in the top 6 of our lineup?
I ask this because there has not been a single team in the history of the NHL that has had success rostering more than 2 under 5'10" players in their top 9 and none of these 3 are 3rd line players. Nazar and Bedard are top 6 or bust types. Kantserov is too talented for the 3rd line.
Then you factor in the size of the Hawks other top forwards sizes and you might realize the Hawks have a size issue in their roster construction. Building your team around small forwards can be dangerous
I really hope Dach becomes a top 6 guy or else this rebuild will heavily rely on free agents/trades for talented players with size that don't come around often
Kucherov and point are taller than 5'10". Gourde and Johnson played depth roles in the bottom 6Kucherov, Point, Gourde, & Tyler Johnson of the multi Cup winning Lightning say hello. But yes we will need to surround them with some diversity in size and shape when filling out the lineup.
gourde played more 5v5 minutes than any other lightning forward in the 2021 playoffs. andrej palat was right behind him. he's listed at 5'11, i guess the arbitrary extra inch is what made all the difference. in fact, of their six most played forwards at 5v5 that playoffs, only one is listed as 6'0" or taller, that being anthony cirelli at exactly 6 feet tall. the next year when they repeat they also got taller with only stamkos and palat in the top six at less than 6 feet tall.Kucherov and point are taller than 5'10". Gourde and Johnson played depth roles in the bottom 6
Just like Paddy Kane is 5'10" or are we talking about with skates on?Kucherov and point are taller than 5'10". Gourde and Johnson played depth roles in the bottom 6
By 1", Do you really think 1 or 2 inches makes a difference? How tall someone is, is meaningless. If they have a bite to their game, they can be as effective as a 6-2" player who doesn't.Kucherov and point are taller than 5'10". Gourde and Johnson played depth roles in the bottom 6
By 1", Do you really think 1 or 2 inches makes a difference?
Exactly. We don't even know if Nazar is going to be an NHLer, or if he is, how effective he will be. I don't see why he can't be a bottom 6 player if the offense doesn't come.It's not nothing, but hockey is also not Basketball and you gotta figure out who all can even play before you start overly fretting on an ideal Stanley Cup winning configuration.
Not what I saw in Rockford. Fits/Lev and Korch/EDM were top 4 and when Kaiser was there instead of Korch, it was Kaiser in the top 4. I don't think Issak saw a second of PP time, either. I welcome someone finding TOI for the last few games but Phillips was invisible.He’s on the top pair in Rockford
Ice time is no issue
Did you notice that Matthew's production falls by like 40% come playoffs? If you're making 11+M AAV you have to be a difference maker, and he hasn't.Eh, I don't think that's the main reason Matthews and Toronto haven't won a Cup.
If Bedard wants to go down the road of 4-5 year deals to maximize his earnings, who am I to judge?
One thing is certain in my mind: the Hawks need to add some toughness to the lineup. They could be the easiest NHL team to play against. Some will dismiss that as irrelevant but it certainly isn't.Question for everybody;
Do you think it is feasible to roster all 3 of Bedard, Nazar, and Kantserov in the top 6 of our lineup?
I ask this because there has not been a single team in the history of the NHL that has had success rostering more than 2 under 5'10" players in their top 9 and none of these 3 are 3rd line players. Nazar and Bedard are top 6 or bust types. Kantserov is too talented for the 3rd line.
Then you factor in the size of the Hawks other top forwards sizes and you might realize the Hawks have a size issue in their roster construction. Building your team around small forwards can be dangerous
I really hope Dach becomes a top 6 guy or else this rebuild will heavily rely on free agents/trades for talented players with size that don't come around often