Prospect Info: 2024-25 Prospect Info (CHL, NCAA, Europe)

PAZ

.
Jul 14, 2011
17,714
10,213
BC
I'll be honest, I'm not even postive Mikko is a 100pt guy on another team without Nate and Cale feeding him. And I wonder how much his floating would be tolerated by another coach then.
Rants would be a 90-100 pt player on most contenders and coaches would be just as tolerant. When you have that much talent, you just accept a player's flaw.

But I do think you'd see a different Mikko if he was expected to play 18 minutes a night instead of 23 minutes.
 

expatriatedtexan

Habitual Line Stepper
Aug 17, 2005
18,641
15,064
Rants would be a 90-100 pt player on most contenders and coaches would be just as tolerant. When you have that much talent, you just accept a player's flaw.

But I do think you'd see a different Mikko if he was expected to play 18 minutes a night instead of 23 minutes.
I'd really like to see that Mikko... playing either on our second line or for a team in the east this spring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GirardSpinorama

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
47,871
31,117
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
I'll be honest, I'm not even postive Mikko is a 100pt guy on another team without Nate and Cale feeding him. And I wonder how much his floating would be tolerated by another coach then.
Yes, I think he would be. Big, rangy wingers with elite passing and shooting skills don't grow on trees. Put him on a team with a legit #1 center and a legit #1 blueliner and he'd thrive regardless.

I hate that this made me think of Mikko..
But that's not an issue because Mikko's not a center. Probably reason #1 as to why he didn't work out as a center.
 
  • Like
Reactions: expatriatedtexan

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad