NBA 2024-25 NBA Season

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
20,015
4,012
Ottabot City
yes, 2013-2018 was the worst stretch in lakers franchise history. no big name FA was willing to sign with them until lebron
You mean they couldn't buy a championship. I would say Lebron wasn't much of a rescue. It was more about having the spotlight on him/access to Hollywood/being considered a Laker great, which he won't be..

A month ago, the media had the Lakers going to the WCF. Now they are in a downfall and it’s ’well, lakers need more pieces’.

Which one is it then?
Lebron deserves to be on a losing team considering he always jumps ship when his team has exhausted every possible dollar and asset to make him happy.

He will go down as the greatest ball hog of all time.
 

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,593
17,345
You mean they couldn't buy a championship. I would say Lebron wasn't much of a rescue. It was more about having the spotlight on him/access to Hollywood/being considered a Laker great, which he won't be..
isn't that the whole point of free agency? he absolutely rescued the franchise. the lakers were going nowhere before he signed
 

Jack Straw

Moving much too slow.
Sponsor
Jul 19, 2010
25,852
26,899
New York
Embiid with his third broken face and now McCain, probably leading the pack for RotY, needs meniscus surgery.



Someone needs to start sacrificing live chickens or something to get this curse on the Sixers lifted.
 

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
20,015
4,012
Ottabot City
could've been better if lebron and pelinka hadn't blown up a title winning team to bring westbrick in
Did they win a title, yes but there were circumstances. They played 20 less games had a break did a seating tournament and won. Would have been a lot different if they played 82 and won it. I think The Lakers caught lightning in a bottle more than they were a true caliber contender.
 

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,593
17,345
Did they win a title, yes but there were circumstances. They played 20 less games had a break did a seating tournament and won. Would have been a lot different if they played 82 and won it. I think The Lakers caught lightning in a bottle more than they were a true caliber contender.
yeah, that's just pure cope. they were #1 in the west at the time of the shutdown and had just beaten the bucks and clippers in back to back games. not to mention they were the 3rd best defensive team in the league. you could maybe make that argument for miami, but the lakers were a top 3 team all season
 

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
20,015
4,012
Ottabot City
yeah, that's just pure cope. they were #1 in the west at the time of the shutdown and had just beaten the bucks and clippers in back to back games. not to mention they were the 3rd best defensive team in the league. you could maybe make that argument for miami, but the lakers were a top 3 team all season
We both know regular season means nothing. Were they good, yes, but that last 20 games is when teams start turning it up for the playoffs. One off games don't mean anything to a 7 game series. Their chip is between a NBA cup and a real chip.

2 of Lebron 4 championships came from shortened season.
 

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,593
17,345
We both know regular season means nothing. Were they good, yes, but that last 20 games is when teams start turning it up for the playoffs. One off games don't mean anything to a 7 game series. Their chip is between a NBA cup and a real chip.

2 of Lebron 4 championships came from shortened season.
and if your team had won, you'd be calling it the hardest championship ever

like i said, pure cope
 

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
20,015
4,012
Ottabot City
and if your team had won, you'd be calling it the hardest championship ever

like i said, pure cope
My team did win when GS were all injured and we had Leonard for 1 season. I know if GS was healthy we wouldn't have even won a game. History books will mark it as a chip but it's not like we defeated one of the greats at full strength.

If Toronto won in the bubble I would have been the first one to say "yeah, but". Short cuts are short cuts no matter who takes them and for what reason...........like only going to teams who can afford to buy championships.
 

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,593
17,345
My team did win when GS were all injured and we had Leonard for 1 season. I know if GS was healthy we wouldn't have even won a game. History books will mark it as a chip but it's not like we defeated one of the greats at full strength.

If Toronto won in the bubble I would have been the first one to say "yeah, but". Short cuts are short cuts no matter who takes them and for what reason...........like only going to teams who can afford to buy championships.
lebron took a shortcut joining a lakers team that had been one of the worst teams in the league for 5 seasons prior?

did you expect the highest profile player in the league to have signed with the hornets or pistons?
 

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
20,015
4,012
Ottabot City
lebron took a shortcut joining a lakers team that had been one of the worst teams in the league for 5 seasons prior?

did you expect the highest profile player in the league to have signed with the hornets or pistons?
But the lakers went from the worst to first no? They were willing to buy who ever they could to win. It doesnt always work but how many teams can offer what the Lakers can. There's a reason why he went to LA and Miami. Going back to Cleveland was a vanity project were he though he could lead them to multiples but couldn't.

He could have tried winning in Washington.
 

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,593
17,345
But the lakers went from the worst to first no? They were willing to buy who ever they could to win. It doesnt always work but how many teams can offer what the Lakers can. There's a reason why he went to LA and Miami. Going back to Cleveland was a vanity project were he though he could lead them to multiples but couldn't.

He could have tried winning in Washington.
they went from 11th in the west in 17/18 to 10th in 18/19 with lebron to 1st in 19/20

lakers didn't "buy" AD though. they traded three up and coming young players and a bunch of picks for him. after lebron and AD, the third and fourth highest paid guys on that team were danny green and KCP. not exactly guys you "buy" titles with

no serious player who cares about winning is signing with washington
 

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
20,015
4,012
Ottabot City
they went from 11th in the west in 17/18 to 10th in 18/19 with Lebron injured and a veteran roster to 1st in 19/20 with AD. They Also added Dwight Howard, Danny Green, Markieff Morris , Rondo from the year before. These 4 players contributed almost 30 points a game on that run.

In his first year they signed a bunch of players to 1 year contracts knowing they were going to need the cap space to bring in AD.

They bought Lebron and A.D. and filled out the rest of the roster from the players they got over 2 seasons on cheap contracts because Lebron and A.D. made up more than half of the cap.
 

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,593
17,345
they went from 11th in the west in 17/18 to 10th in 18/19 with Lebron injured and a veteran roster to 1st in 19/20 with AD. They Also added Dwight Howard, Danny Green, Markieff Morris , Rondo from the year before. These 4 players contributed almost 30 points a game on that run.

In his first year they signed a bunch of players to 1 year contracts knowing they were going to need the cap space to bring in AD.

They bought Lebron and A.D. and filled out the rest of the roster from the players they got over 2 seasons on cheap contracts because Lebron and A.D. made up more than half of the cap.
trading your future for a star is not "buying" a title. it's a gamble more than anything because no one can tell the future. the clips and the SGA trade is a great example of that same gamble gone wrong.

bringing in those vets was just good managing by pelinka to address certain needs. again, not "buying" anything. if that was the case, then every title is bought because every championship team is comprised of key guys brought in via FA
 

Stylizer1

Teflon Don
Jun 12, 2009
20,015
4,012
Ottabot City
Anyway you acquire superstar players and surround them with competent vets willing to take pay cuts because its their best chance at winning a championship is the definition of buying a championship. The opposite would be drafting your stars and building a solid roster around them with depth and gradually earning your way to a championship. All of the great teams did this with the exception of the Lakers. Boston was the first modern day team to assemble a team through trades/free agency to win a championship. Pierce was in the league 9 seasons and made it to the east finals once early in his career. Garnett and Allen both were in the league 12 seasons and were on teams that had already peaked and were going into a rebuild. They struck lightning in a bottle and were a championship caliber team for the next 4 seasons. Houston with Olajuwon and Drexler tried adding Barkley and that didn't work. When Drexler retired the brought in Pippen which also failed. They were trying to maintain a level of play with an aging roster. Golden State drafter Green, Curry, and Thompson and built a roster around them. They won a championship. I remember it like it was yesterday Lebron saying they needed to add another player to compete and he was calling out his owner. The media were all saying Carmelo Anthony was going to go to Cleveland. GS turned around and added Kevin Durant. San Antonio drafted Robinson, Duncan, Parker, Ginobli, Elliot, etc.

It's one thing to add star players to an aging veteran team to put them over the top and another to completely wipe out the teams players and futures to bring a roster meant to win today. Even the Lakers of the 70's and 80's built most of their core through the draft while Abdul-Jabar was on still on the roster.

It's always a gamble.
 

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,593
17,345
Anyway you acquire superstar players and surround them with competent vets willing to take pay cuts because its their best chance at winning a championship is the definition of buying a championship. The opposite would be drafting your stars and building a solid roster around them with depth and gradually earning your way to a championship. All of the great teams did this with the exception of the Lakers. Boston was the first modern day team to assemble a team through trades/free agency to win a championship. Pierce was in the league 9 seasons and made it to the east finals once early in his career. Garnett and Allen both were in the league 12 seasons and were on teams that had already peaked and were going into a rebuild. They struck lightning in a bottle and were a championship caliber team for the next 4 seasons. Houston with Olajuwon and Drexler tried adding Barkley and that didn't work. When Drexler retired the brought in Pippen which also failed. They were trying to maintain a level of play with an aging roster. Golden State drafter Green, Curry, and Thompson and built a roster around them. They won a championship. I remember it like it was yesterday Lebron saying they needed to add another player to compete and he was calling out his owner. The media were all saying Carmelo Anthony was going to go to Cleveland. GS turned around and added Kevin Durant. San Antonio drafted Robinson, Duncan, Parker, Ginobli, Elliot, etc.

It's one thing to add star players to an aging veteran team to put them over the top and another to completely wipe out the teams players and futures to bring a roster meant to win today. Even the Lakers of the 70's and 80's built most of their core through the draft while Abdul-Jabar was on still on the roster.

It's always a gamble.
rondo and avery bradley were the only vets on that roster who took paycuts compared to their last contracts, and bradley didn't even play in the bubble. rondo originally signed for 1 yr 9 mil prior to 18-19 and then re-signed for 2 years 5 mil prior to 19-20. bradley signed for 2 yrs 9.7 mil. green was owed 14.6 mil. dwight was brought in last minute when cousins got hurt. morris was signed for cheap using the disabled player exemption they got because of cousins injury. so at the end of the day, rondo was the only difference maker on that team who took a paycut to join the team

so the lakers should have just stayed the course and continued missing the playoffs instead of making a trade that'd turn them into contenders....just because?

the 04 pistons core were all acquired via trades with the exception of tayshaun prince. do you have an issue with how they built that team?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad