- Oct 23, 2014
- 30,257
- 42,841
Just wait until Bronny comes in and leads the Lakers to the NBA Final.
That dude couldn’t lead an AAu team to a championship
Just wait until Bronny comes in and leads the Lakers to the NBA Final.
You mean they couldn't buy a championship. I would say Lebron wasn't much of a rescue. It was more about having the spotlight on him/access to Hollywood/being considered a Laker great, which he won't be..yes, 2013-2018 was the worst stretch in lakers franchise history. no big name FA was willing to sign with them until lebron
Lebron deserves to be on a losing team considering he always jumps ship when his team has exhausted every possible dollar and asset to make him happy.A month ago, the media had the Lakers going to the WCF. Now they are in a downfall and it’s ’well, lakers need more pieces’.
Which one is it then?
isn't that the whole point of free agency? he absolutely rescued the franchise. the lakers were going nowhere before he signedYou mean they couldn't buy a championship. I would say Lebron wasn't much of a rescue. It was more about having the spotlight on him/access to Hollywood/being considered a Laker great, which he won't be..
Other than a covid chip its been been pretty bad.isn't that the whole point of free agency? he absolutely rescued the franchise. the lakers were going nowhere before he signed
could've been better if lebron and pelinka hadn't blown up a title winning team to bring westbrick inOther than a covid chip its been been pretty bad.
You know, I could probably miss 75 3s too. I look forward to my 5 yr $50 million any day now
Did they win a title, yes but there were circumstances. They played 20 less games had a break did a seating tournament and won. Would have been a lot different if they played 82 and won it. I think The Lakers caught lightning in a bottle more than they were a true caliber contender.could've been better if lebron and pelinka hadn't blown up a title winning team to bring westbrick in
yeah, that's just pure cope. they were #1 in the west at the time of the shutdown and had just beaten the bucks and clippers in back to back games. not to mention they were the 3rd best defensive team in the league. you could maybe make that argument for miami, but the lakers were a top 3 team all seasonDid they win a title, yes but there were circumstances. They played 20 less games had a break did a seating tournament and won. Would have been a lot different if they played 82 and won it. I think The Lakers caught lightning in a bottle more than they were a true caliber contender.
We both know regular season means nothing. Were they good, yes, but that last 20 games is when teams start turning it up for the playoffs. One off games don't mean anything to a 7 game series. Their chip is between a NBA cup and a real chip.yeah, that's just pure cope. they were #1 in the west at the time of the shutdown and had just beaten the bucks and clippers in back to back games. not to mention they were the 3rd best defensive team in the league. you could maybe make that argument for miami, but the lakers were a top 3 team all season