Speculation: 2024-25 - Free Agency/Trade Thread

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,111
6,023
Visit site
Honestly. If he really is an issue he probably should. We don't NEED the assets if he doesn't have value currently. I'd love to swap him for a veteran forward though.
Maybe I’m misunderstanding your post but I thin this organization needs all the assets it can get.
 

Terry Yake

Registered User
Aug 5, 2013
28,490
17,229
This is not meant as a shot a Fowler, but since Trouba got here, we have too many D. If Fowler is going to go (and it appears all parties agree he needs to go) it needs to be asap. Just removing from from the current roster is a positive at this point. Pat needs to find the best offer and just pull the trigger.
i agree, but i'd be shocked if they traded him before he reached 1k games. they're probably going to let him have that moment as a duck and then ship him out soon after
 

DavidBL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
6,277
4,300
Orange, CA
Maybe I’m misunderstanding your post but I thin this organization needs all the assets it can get.
It depends on how the league sees him. If he has value sure, get a useful player or pick. We shouldn't be holding out for best value possible at this point if he is actually an issue.
 

All Mighty

Registered User
Sep 20, 2014
12,426
20,043
California
allmightyhockeytalk.com
Get ready for some more fun proposals:
1734037204700.png



IF McTavish is actually on the block, who are some reasonable targets?
 

dracom

Registered User
Dec 22, 2015
13,891
10,157
Vancouver, WA
Any trade that happens needs to not just be draft picks or prospects as the main piece. Get proven players back who haven’t been tainted by this teams inability to develop players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11Justin93

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,111
6,023
Visit site
It depends on how the league sees him. If he has value sure, get a useful player or pick. We shouldn't be holding out for best value possible at this point if he is actually an issue.
I don't know what his value is around the league but it is certainly not sky high right now due to injury and sketchy play. As for him being an "issue" I don't know where that is coming from. Yes, he may want to be traded but I can't imagine he is a problem in the room. I'm not sure I see the rush. I'm totally fine waiting for the TDL and if that means sending down a couple of the kids until after the TDL then I'm fine with that too.
 

DavidBL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2012
6,277
4,300
Orange, CA
I don't know what his value is around the league but it is certainly not sky high right now due to injury and sketchy play. As for him being an "issue" I don't know where that is coming from. Yes, he may want to be traded but I can't imagine he is a problem in the room. I'm not sure I see the rush. I'm totally fine waiting for the TDL and if that means sending down a couple of the kids until after the TDL then I'm fine with that too.
I don't disagree. Just acknowledging that we don't know what's going on in the room. His play has been down and it's public that he's open to move. Not sure it's wise to be picky about the value of the return.
 

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,111
6,023
Visit site
Any trade that happens needs to not just be draft picks or prospects as the main piece. Get proven players back who haven’t been tainted by this teams inability to develop players.
The age range and contract status of the "proven" players needs to be major considerations. Teams will line up to give you their 28 year-old who is one year from UFA players for McTavish. But I don't see him returning a 23-25 year-old core player. Right now I'd say his value is marginally higher than what Jiricek returned...and that is just not enough.
 

Rybread86

To the DOME
Mar 24, 2022
2,425
3,056
OC
Get ready for some more fun proposals:
View attachment 944179


IF McTavish is actually on the block, who are some reasonable targets?


Man, I would really hate to give up on Mac even though things havent been going great.

If you do this, then I think Zegras almost has to be one of your centers going forward, end the wing experiments completely.

I dont know who the targets should be, but Id be looking for established talents, not projects or promising prospects. We are not doing good in the development department and I wouldnt want to just bring in a guy to ruin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Firequacker

tomd

Registered User
Apr 23, 2003
10,111
6,023
Visit site
I don't disagree. Just acknowledging that we don't know what's going on in the room. His play has been down and it's public that he's open to move. Not sure it's wise to be picky about the value of the return.
If he is not a locker room problem then I think it is distinctly unwise to trade him when his value is at its lowest. What is gained by that?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad