Not sure what the first sentence is supposed to mean. Is there some kind of a political statement there?
It’s people giving rational opinions on why this team seems to have very good young talent but can’t seem to make any progress achieving results with any of them. Nobody is forced to agree with it but given those guys aren’t Ducks fans they have no bias one way or the other.
It just means that people hop on the bandwagon when someone posts something that makes a situation look a certain way, even though there’s no real evidence (like the Zegras lip reading thing). People see him score a goal where he doesn’t celebrate and suddenly everyone is saying how he lost his love for the game or whatever. Maybe that’s true, maybe it’s not, but people make up their mind about it and run with it and go on to create their own narratives about what’s happening.
I guess my biggest issue is that the people in the video made it pretty clear that they don’t watch the Ducks at all (and I wouldn’t expect them to). Yet they saw this one short clip of Zegras and came to a bunch of different conclusions. That’s the kind of surface level analysis I would expect to see from people on Twitter (the original Zegras clip has hundreds of responses saying similar things). I’m just tired of the “Zegras look sad, he must hate being Duck” narrative that everyone is throwing around. Again, maybe that is actually the case, but it’s still a pretty big leap to make from such little information.