Prospect Info: [2024 - 21st] Michael Hage, Chicago Steel (USHL), Committed to U of Michigan

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Yess, but he have the talent and hard work in his game to become that. Same qualities of Demidov.
I take Hage being a future 1st line C with a huge grain of salt at this juncture in his amateur career. As you state, though, his work ethic, to go along with what is obvious talent against his peers right now, is promising.

Whether Hage becomes a C or a winger at the NHL level, it will be a huge win for us if he becomes a top-6 player.

With Caufield, Demidov, Slafkovsky and Laine as potential top-6 players already ion the system, Hage becoming a top-6 Center would be HUGE
 
Always better to see prospects have good stats, even though we are never sure how that talent will translate at the NHL level.

Easier to expect prospects to keep sucking at the NHL level if they already suck at lower levels. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabzSauce
What were Newhook numbers after 15 games ?

6g 6a 12pts in 15 games.

But the difference is Boston College had a better team and Newhook was much better surrounded than either Caufield and Hage. He finished the season with more points than Caufield. There's a difference of doing great because of teammates in the NCAA. Neither Hage nor Caufield had good teammates like Newhook had. It helped Newhook a whole lot.
 
Last edited:
I take Hage being a future 1st line C with a huge grain of salt at this juncture in his amateur career. As you state, though, his work ethic, to go along with what is obvious talent against his peers right now, is promising.

Whether Hage becomes a C or a winger at the NHL level, it will be a huge win for us if he becomes a top-6 player.

With Caufield, Demidov, Slafkovsky and Laine as potential top-6 players already ion the system, Hage becoming a top-6 Center would be HUGE
Hage could help the Habs overcome the failed Dach experiment
 
6g 6a 12pts in 15 games.

But the difference is Boston College had a better team and Newhook was much better surrounded than either Caufield and Hage. He finished the season with more points than Caufield. There's a difference of doing great because of teammates in the NCAA. Neither Hage nor Caufield had good teammates like Newhook had. It helped Newhook a whole lot.

100%

Newhook ended up being the leading scorer on that team with 42 points in 34 games, but there were 4 players scored over a point a game with Matt Boldy being the 5th best scorer on that team.

Name, YrGPGAPts.Pt/GPShotsSh%PIMGWGPPGSHG+/-
Alex Newhook, F, Fr341923421.248821.6844328
Julius Mattila, F, Sr341032421.249111.01043121
David Cotton, F, Sr321524391.2211812.74636015
Logan Hutsko, F, Jr301914331.1011117.11643017
Matt Boldy, LW, Fr34917260.761018.9


If you compare this with Hage, he doesn't have the same scoring support and overall forward depth. He's the straw that stirs the drink on this team

Name, YrGPGAPts.Pt/GPShotsSh%PIMGWGPPGSHG+/-TOI/GCHIP
Michael Hage, F, Fr15108181.203826.36420616:3726.0
T.J. Hughes, F, Jr1858130.72559.110130-319:1121.1
Garrett Schifsky, F, So1876130.724814.610213116:5820.1
Evan Werner, F, So1767130.765111.819210015:1817.8
Jacob Truscott, D, Gr1837100.562910.36030022:0026.3
 
100%

Newhook ended up being the leading scorer on that team with 42 points in 34 games, but there were 4 players scored over a point a game with Matt Boldy being the 5th best scorer on that team.

[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TH]Name, Yr[/TH]
[TH]GP[/TH]
[TH]G[/TH]
[TH]A[/TH]
[TH]Pts.[/TH]
[TH]Pt/GP[/TH]
[TH]Shots[/TH]
[TH]Sh%[/TH]
[TH]PIM[/TH]
[TH]GWG[/TH]
[TH]PPG[/TH]
[TH]SHG[/TH]
[TH]+/-[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Alex Newhook, F, Fr[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]23[/TD]
[TD]42[/TD]
[TD]1.24[/TD]
[TD]88[/TD]
[TD]21.6[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]28[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Julius Mattila, F, Sr[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]32[/TD]
[TD]42[/TD]
[TD]1.24[/TD]
[TD]91[/TD]
[TD]11.0[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]21[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]David Cotton, F, Sr[/TD]
[TD]32[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]39[/TD]
[TD]1.22[/TD]
[TD]118[/TD]
[TD]12.7[/TD]
[TD]46[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Logan Hutsko, F, Jr[/TD]
[TD]30[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]14[/TD]
[TD]33[/TD]
[TD]1.10[/TD]
[TD]111[/TD]
[TD]17.1[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Matt Boldy, LW, Fr[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]9[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]26[/TD]
[TD]0.76[/TD]
[TD]101[/TD]
[TD]8.9[/TD]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


If you compare this with Hage, he doesn't have the same scoring support and overall forward depth. He's the straw that stirs the drink on this team

[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TH]Name, Yr[/TH]
[TH]GP[/TH]
[TH]G[/TH]
[TH]A[/TH]
[TH]Pts.[/TH]
[TH]Pt/GP[/TH]
[TH]Shots[/TH]
[TH]Sh%[/TH]
[TH]PIM[/TH]
[TH]GWG[/TH]
[TH]PPG[/TH]
[TH]SHG[/TH]
[TH]+/-[/TH]
[TH]TOI/G[/TH]
[TH]CHIP[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Michael Hage, F, Fr[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]1.20[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]26.3[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]16:37[/TD]
[TD]26.0[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]T.J. Hughes, F, Jr[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]0.72[/TD]
[TD]55[/TD]
[TD]9.1[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]-3[/TD]
[TD]19:11[/TD]
[TD]21.1[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Garrett Schifsky, F, So[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]0.72[/TD]
[TD]48[/TD]
[TD]14.6[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]16:58[/TD]
[TD]20.1[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Evan Werner, F, So[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]0.76[/TD]
[TD]51[/TD]
[TD]11.8[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]15:18[/TD]
[TD]17.8[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Jacob Truscott, D, Gr[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]0.56[/TD]
[TD]29[/TD]
[TD]10.3[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]22:00[/TD]
[TD]26.3[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

Great context! Love it
 
  • Like
Reactions: FrankMTL
I take Hage being a future 1st line C with a huge grain of salt at this juncture in his amateur career. As you state, though, his work ethic, to go along with what is obvious talent against his peers right now, is promising.

Whether Hage becomes a C or a winger at the NHL level, it will be a huge win for us if he becomes a top-6 player.

With Caufield, Demidov, Slafkovsky and Laine as potential top-6 players already ion the system, Hage becoming a top-6 Center would be HUGE
Could Beck challenge for a top six spot?
 
100%

Newhook ended up being the leading scorer on that team with 42 points in 34 games, but there were 4 players scored over a point a game with Matt Boldy being the 5th best scorer on that team.

[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TH]Name, Yr[/TH]
[TH]GP[/TH]
[TH]G[/TH]
[TH]A[/TH]
[TH]Pts.[/TH]
[TH]Pt/GP[/TH]
[TH]Shots[/TH]
[TH]Sh%[/TH]
[TH]PIM[/TH]
[TH]GWG[/TH]
[TH]PPG[/TH]
[TH]SHG[/TH]
[TH]+/-[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Alex Newhook, F, Fr[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]23[/TD]
[TD]42[/TD]
[TD]1.24[/TD]
[TD]88[/TD]
[TD]21.6[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]28[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Julius Mattila, F, Sr[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]32[/TD]
[TD]42[/TD]
[TD]1.24[/TD]
[TD]91[/TD]
[TD]11.0[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]21[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]David Cotton, F, Sr[/TD]
[TD]32[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]24[/TD]
[TD]39[/TD]
[TD]1.22[/TD]
[TD]118[/TD]
[TD]12.7[/TD]
[TD]46[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Logan Hutsko, F, Jr[/TD]
[TD]30[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]14[/TD]
[TD]33[/TD]
[TD]1.10[/TD]
[TD]111[/TD]
[TD]17.1[/TD]
[TD]16[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Matt Boldy, LW, Fr[/TD]
[TD]34[/TD]
[TD]9[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]26[/TD]
[TD]0.76[/TD]
[TD]101[/TD]
[TD]8.9[/TD]
[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]


If you compare this with Hage, he doesn't have the same scoring support and overall forward depth. He's the straw that stirs the drink on this team

[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TH]Name, Yr[/TH]
[TH]GP[/TH]
[TH]G[/TH]
[TH]A[/TH]
[TH]Pts.[/TH]
[TH]Pt/GP[/TH]
[TH]Shots[/TH]
[TH]Sh%[/TH]
[TH]PIM[/TH]
[TH]GWG[/TH]
[TH]PPG[/TH]
[TH]SHG[/TH]
[TH]+/-[/TH]
[TH]TOI/G[/TH]
[TH]CHIP[/TH]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Michael Hage, F, Fr[/TD]
[TD]15[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]1.20[/TD]
[TD]38[/TD]
[TD]26.3[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]4[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]16:37[/TD]
[TD]26.0[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]T.J. Hughes, F, Jr[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]5[/TD]
[TD]8[/TD]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]0.72[/TD]
[TD]55[/TD]
[TD]9.1[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]-3[/TD]
[TD]19:11[/TD]
[TD]21.1[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Garrett Schifsky, F, So[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]0.72[/TD]
[TD]48[/TD]
[TD]14.6[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]16:58[/TD]
[TD]20.1[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Evan Werner, F, So[/TD]
[TD]17[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]13[/TD]
[TD]0.76[/TD]
[TD]51[/TD]
[TD]11.8[/TD]
[TD]19[/TD]
[TD]2[/TD]
[TD]1[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]15:18[/TD]
[TD]17.8[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Jacob Truscott, D, Gr[/TD]
[TD]18[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]7[/TD]
[TD]10[/TD]
[TD]0.56[/TD]
[TD]29[/TD]
[TD]10.3[/TD]
[TD]6[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]3[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]0[/TD]
[TD]22:00[/TD]
[TD]26.3[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Boldy didn't start to produce until they gave up on him as a centre and put him on Newhook's line. Newhook was doing well before Boldy joined the line. Of course Newhook was the 1c and Boldy 2c when they were both centres,
 
They took you!

And this is reality!

💙❤️🤍

20241226_182355.jpg
 
6g 6a 12pts in 15 games.

But the difference is Boston College had a better team and Newhook was much better surrounded than either Caufield and Hage. He finished the season with more points than Caufield. There's a difference of doing great because of teammates in the NCAA. Neither Hage nor Caufield had good teammates like Newhook had. It helped Newhook a whole lot.
Also Newhook qualities don't translate to the NHL very well. He's on the smallish side and fast and usually that ain't enough for the NHL. I think his shot is overrated he can have a good shot but he doesn't have the instinct of a goal scorer, I've seen this type of player time and time again and they rarely pan out. Hage has a better frame and better hands from what i can see in the videos. Also he seems to have better instincts.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad