Context is there are still good games without shots. Games like last night, he wasn’t terrible despite a terrible looking standard stat line. People key in on the shots only and it misses other things he brings. Shot assists, passes to the slot, defensive play, etc.
Again of the top guys last night, he had the best xGF% last night. Better than Makar, MacK, Rants, etc. He was good against Utah and spectacular vs Detroit. It has been enough or consistent, but people make it sounds like last night was terrible and the last 10 games were all bad (they’ve been mostly bad)… which is just not the case.
Ahh I missed this place.Uh, that isn't what happened. The shot numbers were brought up as a piece of the pie. You brought up attempts/chances because of some supposed missing context.
Now you're pivoting and saying the missing context you were really talking about is a bunch of other mumbo jumbo. Sure thing. Happy that's cleared up.
They already traded us their 3C for ByramDoes Buffalo have a 3C and we can send them Colton or Wood to be up their roster?
They traded for McLeod this offseason, he’s not really someone the Avs want.Does Buffalo have a 3C and we can send them Colton or Wood to be up their roster?
Ahh I missed this place.
I set this up perfectly haha.They already traded us their 3C for Byram
I do think the Avs will go on a run and catch the Central teams ahead.I set this up perfectly haha.
Uh, that isn't what happened. The shot numbers were brought up as a piece of the pie. You brought up attempts/chances because of some supposed missing context.
Now you're pivoting and saying the missing context you were really talking about is a bunch of other mumbo jumbo. Sure thing. Happy that's cleared up.
Hey look another team where Byram doesn't get to be "the guy"Byram - Hughes pairing?
I mean he could go be the guy in San Jose if he wants.Hey look another team where Byram doesn't get to be "the guy"
It does seem odd we signed him to a 1 way contract. Seemed like a perfect choice for a two-way. Unless there was some reason we couldn't? I'm guessing this whole thing was a big favor to the guy. Give him a big raise, and a chance to enter waivers and potentially get picked up by another club. There's also the possibility the Avs still play him too. Just like with Wags, I keep forgetting you can put players on waivers and if they're not claimed, they become exempt for a while. Then you can send them up and down for cap savings.Wait isn't that the guy we just signed? Already on waivers?
It does seem odd we signed him to a 1 way contract. Seemed like a perfect choice for a two-way. Unless there was some reason we couldn't? I'm guessing this whole thing was a big favor to the guy. Give him a big raise, and a chance to enter waivers and potentially get picked up by another club. There's also the possibility the Avs still play him too. Just like with Wags, I keep forgetting you can put players on waivers and if they're not claimed, they become exempt for a while. Then you can send them up and down for cap savings.
This is actually his 2nd contract.It is a two-way contract. That just means he makes a different salary when he's playing NHL games vs AHL games.
His age (26) is the issue. Players who sign their first contract at age 25+ are eligible for waivers right away.
They want that flexibility in order to do the stupid paper transactions after every game to squeeze out every last cent of cap space.Wait isn't that the guy we just signed? Already on waivers?