- Apr 25, 2006
- 52,747
- 57,534
I missed that interview, thanksBednar said they’re waiting for the league to tell them whether it’s the 13th or the 15th.
I missed that interview, thanksBednar said they’re waiting for the league to tell them whether it’s the 13th or the 15th.
Bednar said they’re waiting for the league to tell them whether it’s the 13th or the 15th.
This might explain why they didn’t pick up Aman. If the money is so tight and they are still playing cap games maybe we couldn’t afford him?
That’s why they hired the guy from the nhl recently. They are going to send protected guys up and down all year to save something for the deadline I’m asssuming.They need to hire a better cap centric front office person than they have if that is true.
That’s why they hired the guy from the nhl recently. They are going to send protected guys up and down all year to save something for the deadline I’m asssuming.
I know right? These are some dark times lolIt just seems crazy they couldn't manage to claim that cheap of a player.
Wouldn't sending Shittington and 4giev to the AHL save us enough money to claim a warm body off of waivers? Why are they not using IR effectively if money is so tight?
So many questions, too many questions. Just passs up a free player because....?
I think it’s more the point of being able to fit everyone if there’s a point where we’re healthy.It just seems crazy they couldn't manage to claim that cheap of a player with all of the long term injuries.
Money's not tight.
This might explain why they didn’t pick up Aman. If the money is so tight and they are still playing cap games maybe we couldn’t afford him?
? It most definitely is if Landeskog comes back at any point in the regular season.Money's not tight.
Poolmans's LTIR allows Landy to come back if/when it happens.? It most definitely is if Landeskog comes back at any point in the regular season.
I thought you can't accrue cap space with LTIR overages.That’s why they hired the guy from the nhl recently. They are going to send protected guys up and down all year to save something for the deadline I’m asssuming.
Not with Nuke as well. Nuke currently isn’t counting at all against our cap.Poolmans's LTIR allows Landy to come back if/when it happens.
That might be true as well. I don’t understand the point then of sending Kovalenko and Ivan up and down just on paper on the non game days if they aren’t somehow saving cap space?I thought you can't accrue cap space with LTIR overages.
Buddy… we’ve been through enoughI know but there must be a definitive date.
6 month suspension = should be eligible to play vs LAK on the 13th. That's 6 months on the nose.
Assuming he got suspended for 6 months on May 13th his suspension should end on November 12th at 11:59 PM.
Technically, the Avs are not above the cap because Nuke is treated like he was shot to Mars. According to CapWages, the Avs are $7.278M under the cap, but that actually includes 24 players, not 23, largely because there are 3 goalies active on the roster. So really $8.278MI thought you can't accrue cap space with LTIR overages.
Technically, the Avs are not above the cap because Nuke is treated like he was shot to Mars. According to CapWages, the Avs are $7.278M under the cap, but that actually includes 24 players, not 23, largely because there are 3 goalies active on the roster. So really $8.278M
In theory, Landy takes $7M of that space, should he return, leaving $1.278M. Nuke is going to require approximately $5M when he returns. So even cutting 4 players and using a roster of 20 - thus saving about $3.4M - the Avs are still a little bit short. So every dollar they can save by these paper transactions will ( I presume CMac has calculated this) slowly accrue enough room for Nuke.
TL;DR - Unless the Avs conserve cap space, they will be unable to fit both Nuke and Landy on the roster.
But... but... Landeskog is never coming back so why would the Avs have the math down to a tee to accommodate both Landy and Nuke?