- Sep 1, 2010
- 9,979
- 7,923
A kid sued the NCAA because he played in a couple OHL exhibition games and that cost him his college eligibility. This will likely lead to the end of the prohibition on Major Junior players being able to play in the NCAA, which has been inevitable for a while now, since the implementation of NIL essentially ended the whole "amateurism" charade.
here's a recent article as the suitthat potential change has been brought up a few times with NILs in place it makes the whole thing dumb. If it changes it will be cause NCAA admits they aren't no more amateurs than the guys in juniors now not cause some random guy didn't follow the rules and is now crying about it.
NCAA sued over major-junior hockey player ban
The NCAA is being sued over its ban of major junior hockey players.
www.espn.com
the restrictions do seem obsolete given, not just NIL,
but the examples such as the NCAA Swede and Ledecky :
"...Masterson argues in the suit that even pro athletes who have been financially compensated -- such as swimmer Katie Ledecky -- still retained NCAA eligibility. The suit also notes Boston College's Tom Willander played professionally in Sweden and was still allowed to dress in the NCAA too"