Prospect Info: 2024-2025 Ottawa Senators In the system

[PlayersLtd]

I'd imaginre Cristalli and Catton get about 15 each in the first series alone

One shy ofOstapchuk's legendary performance vs Everett.... Sounds about right.

 

[BondraTime]

One shy ofOstapchuk's legendary performance vs Everett.... Sounds about right.

If they play more than 4 games it’s likely to be 20+

 

[Sens of Anarchy]

The Hitmen are 7-3-0 in their last 10 games
Their PP% is 19.8 that's 17th out of 22 teams
Their PP opportunities are 1st 232
Their shots are 2nd 2048
Their shots per game are 2nd 36.571
Their goals/game are 4th 4.089
Their pts % is .688 ; tops in their conference
Their goals against is 159 best in their conference
Yakemchuk can't complain that he is playing on a non productive team that sits back and doesn't generate offense.

Compared to Saginaw a team that is supposed to play more offensive is used for a reason Parekh has a lot more points, Calgary's stats look good (both are 2nd in shots and shots/gp); Calgary has more shots/g than any team in the OHL. Saginaw does score more and is 1st in the OHL in goals/game although their team pts % is at .600 (8th). Saginaw does produce more on the PP ; 2nd in the OHL and click at 26.9%; also draw penalties 2nd in opportunities (227) . Calgary has a few more PPOs. Yakemchuk also produces less than Dickinson ,,, because London has a wagon of a team and Dickinson's points come from huge games that he takes over like the one last night .. 4 pts in a 4-3 game. 2g, 2a and the OT winner.

Yakemchuk stats are decent but not as prolific as I expected given his + age and where he was last year on a less productive team.
Glad his plus/minus has elevated to 0. Parekh the guy that can't play D and needs to score on the PP is +37 when their team has allowed 211 goals. That can't be right a team allowing the fewest goals in their conference has a 0 +/- player that is better defensively than a +37 player on a team that has allowed a lot more goals.

 

[Wallet Inspector]

Yakemchuk is a good prospect but Parekh and Catton are looking exceptional.

Frankly all the "Parekh can't play defense, his offense won't translate" stuff just feels like copium to me.

 

[PlayersLtd]

If they play more than 4 games it’s likely to be 20+

The Everett Spokane matchup is going to be a really good one, and then Victoria. The road to the memorial cup goes through one of them imo, Spokane and Victoria both seemingly peaking at the right time so I give the edge there. Don't think Medicine Hat hangs with either.

 

[Hale The Villain]

Yakemchuk is a good prospect but Parekh and Catton are looking exceptional.

Frankly all the "Parekh can't play defense, his offense won't translate" stuff just feels like copium to me.

People said the same about Ryan Ellis throughout his junior career.

His elite offensive ability in junior didn't end up translating due to not being able to skate worth a damn, but developed into an excellent two-way D because of his high-end IQ.

Parekh should be fine defensively, and his offensive ability looks Karlsson-esque. Just unreal combination of smarts, skill and shooting ability from the blueline.

Taking an older (and yet) worse offensive RD over him just because of size and toughness is just classic Sens. Took Cowen over Ellis back in 2009 too.

Our scouting staff needs to be fired into the sun.

 

[PlayersLtd]

Yakemchuk is a good prospect but Parekh and Catton are looking exceptional.

Frankly all the "Parekh can't play defense, his offense won't translate" stuff just feels like copium to me.

What has changed in Parekh to give you any more confidence in his game translating smoothly to the NHL? Out of all of the big names coming out of the first round he is still the biggest question mark, along with Lindstrom (for different reasons). Yakemchuk is on a different tier in terms of projectable NHL impact.

 

[Sens of Anarchy]

What has changed in Parekh to give you any more confidence in his game translating smoothly to the NHL? Out of all of the big names coming out of the first round he is still the biggest question mark, along with Lindstrom (for different reasons). Yakemchuk is on a different tier in terms of projectable NHL impact.

I agree with more projectable NHL game in some respects , but mainly due to size... I would not say a tier above he would be showing that now

 

[PlayersLtd]

I agree with more projectable NHL game in some respects , but mainly due to size... I would not say a tier above he would be showing that now

Parekh has what I consider to be kryptonite for a skilled player transitioning to the NHL, inconsistent compete levels driven by attitude (and possibly character) deficiencies. The evidence supporting how this may hold him back is a checkered history in excelling against higher competition, namely WJHC camp and Flames training camp and some documented attitude stuff. Small sample size but it's a red flag for me. Players that dominate jr on skill alone get a proceed with caution stamp in my books. Without the right attitude it can manifest itself in the form of lacking perseverance and ability to overcome adversity. The Josh Ho Sang lesson on the extreme end. That said it is really easy to be wrong about this, recently I thought Evan Bouchard had red flags for similar reasons. I don't think I was completely wrong there but he's obviously a good NHLer. Drouin was another one for me and I'm not sure I was wrong there.

Ryan Ellis is a bad example for whoever brought it up. In jr Ellis was universally respected in the league. He had leadership qualities well beyond his years, was a hard worker and generally likeable player. Recall that he didn't even participate in his D+1 all star skills comp because he was too good, instead he filled in as a guest judge over his peers and he made it fun and did it without any ego. He had a completely different kind of character and approach to the game. This, in my opinion, played a huge role in his ability to adapt once the going got tough in the NHL.

Yakemchk is more projectable than Parekh to me because of his character. His is quiet, humble, and has a bit of a lunch pale element to his game. He is willing to get dirty, physical and stick up for his teammates, there is even some old school violence there which tells me something (ostaphuk has the same thing for what it's worth). His offensive elements have more potential to translate to the NHL as well since a lot of it is based on engaging physically, using his frame to create space, beating players in close, coming in from the point and going to the dirty areas. I'm also convinced that Yak is taking his D to heart this year and that explains his point totals. If that is true that speaks volumes about his attitude, professionalism and dedication. I'm not sure Parekh has that same character fibre. Don't know the guy and don't watch as much OHL but I'm suspicious.

On the purely talent side to me Zayne Parekh has a more Erik Karlsson or Quinn Hughes type game whereas Yak is more Brent Burns. And for that my point would be that the former is harder to translate compared to the latter. But yeah, probably bigger returns if it hits. Although I would say the returns on that type of talent tend to be shorter term whereas the bigger offensive guys typically stretch their impact longer into their careers.

Anyway, all told I think Yak has a brighter future and the concern for this years point totals kind of make me laugh, especially juxtaposed to Parekh's continued point totals. Points mean nothing for these guys future, we know they have the talent. It's how they develop a pro game off the puck that will tell the story.

 

[Bjornar Moxnes]

Parekh has what I consider to be kryptonite for a skilled player transitioning to the NHL, inconsistent compete levels driven by attitude (and possibly character) deficiencies. The evidence supporting how this may hold him back is a checkered history in excelling against higher competition, namely WJHC camp and Flames training camp and some documented attitude stuff. Small sample size but it's a red flag for me. Players that dominate jr on skill alone get a proceed with caution stamp in my books. Without the right attitude it can manifest itself in the form of lacking perseverance and ability to overcome adversity. The Josh Ho Sang lesson on the extreme end. That said it is really easy to be wrong about this, recently I thought Evan Bouchard had red flags for similar reasons. I don't think I was completely wrong there but he's obviously a good NHLer. Drouin was another one for me and I'm not sure I was wrong there.

Ryan Ellis is a bad example for whoever brought it up. In jr Ellis was universally respected in the league. He had leadership qualities well beyond his years, was a hard worker and generally likeable player. Recall that he didn't even participate in his D+1 all star skills comp because he was too good, instead he filled in as a guest judge over his peers and he made it fun and did it without any ego. He had a completely different kind of character and approach to the game. This, in my opinion, played a huge role in his ability to adapt once the going got tough in the NHL.

Yakemchk is more projectable than Parekh to me because of his character. His is quiet, humble, and has a bit of a lunch pale element to his game. He is willing to get dirty, physical and stick up for his teammates, there is even some old school violence there which tells me something (ostaphuk has the same thing for what it's worth). His offensive elements have more potential to translate to the NHL as well since a lot of it is based on engaging physically, using his frame to create space, beating players in close, coming in from the point and going to the dirty areas. I'm also convinced that Yak is taking his D to heart this year and that explains his point totals. If that is true that speaks volumes about his attitude, professionalism and dedication. I'm not sure Parekh has that same character fibre. Don't know the guy and don't watch as much OHL but I'm suspicious.

On the purely talent side to me Zayne Parekh has a more Erik Karlsson or Quinn Hughes type game whereas Yak is more Brent Burns. And for that my point would be that the former is harder to translate compared to the latter. But yeah, probably bigger returns if it hits. Although I would say the returns on that type of talent tend to be shorter term whereas the bigger offensive guys typically stretch their impact longer into their careers.

Anyway, all told I think Yak has a brighter future and the concern for this years point totals kind of make me laugh, especially juxtaposed to Parekh's continued point totals. Points mean nothing for these guys future, we know they have the talent. It's how they develop a pro game off the puck that will tell the story.

Character is extremely overrated and also could very well change instantly. Rutger McGroaty was considered a great leader who was a beloved team mate and not toxic while Brad Lambert was deemed a cancer in his draft season. Flash forward now and Lambert has had exceptional character development and is a very kind humble person and we all know McGroatys true self. Yakemchuk is a humble person, but Parekh isn't only passionate, but also cares about the wellbeing of people in his community. Sometimes he can be toxic, but it's not a bad thing.

 

[Sens of Anarchy]

Parekh has what I consider to be kryptonite for a skilled player transitioning to the NHL, inconsistent compete levels driven by attitude (and possibly character) deficiencies. The evidence supporting how this may hold him back is a checkered history in excelling against higher competition, namely WJHC camp and Flames training camp and some documented attitude stuff. Small sample size but it's a red flag for me. Players that dominate jr on skill alone get a proceed with caution stamp in my books. Without the right attitude it can manifest itself in the form of lacking perseverance and ability to overcome adversity. The Josh Ho Sang lesson on the extreme end. That said it is really easy to be wrong about this, recently I thought Evan Bouchard had red flags for similar reasons. I don't think I was completely wrong there but he's obviously a good NHLer. Drouin was another one for me and I'm not sure I was wrong there.

Ryan Ellis is a bad example for whoever brought it up. In jr Ellis was universally respected in the league. He had leadership qualities well beyond his years, was a hard worker and generally likeable player. Recall that he didn't even participate in his D+1 all star skills comp because he was too good, instead he filled in as a guest judge over his peers and he made it fun and did it without any ego. He had a completely different kind of character and approach to the game. This, in my opinion, played a huge role in his ability to adapt once the going got tough in the NHL.

Yakemchk is more projectable than Parekh to me because of his character. His is quiet, humble, and has a bit of a lunch pale element to his game. He is willing to get dirty, physical and stick up for his teammates, there is even some old school violence there which tells me something (ostaphuk has the same thing for what it's worth). His offensive elements have more potential to translate to the NHL as well since a lot of it is based on engaging physically, using his frame to create space, beating players in close, coming in from the point and going to the dirty areas. I'm also convinced that Yak is taking his D to heart this year and that explains his point totals. If that is true that speaks volumes about his attitude, professionalism and dedication. I'm not sure Parekh has that same character fibre. Don't know the guy and don't watch as much OHL but I'm suspicious.

On the purely talent side to me Zayne Parekh has a more Erik Karlsson or Quinn Hughes type game whereas Yak is more Brent Burns. And for that my point would be that the former is harder to translate compared to the latter. But yeah, probably bigger returns if it hits. Although I would say the returns on that type of talent tend to be shorter term whereas the bigger offensive guys typically stretch their impact longer into their careers.

Anyway, all told I think Yak has a brighter future and the concern for this years point totals kind of make me laugh, especially juxtaposed to Parekh's continued point totals. Points mean nothing for these guys future, we know they have the talent. It's how they develop a pro game off the puck that will tell the story.

Is this available in hard cover? I respect your opinion but too much of a blurb for my uneducated reading level... numbers and pictures are good. lol

 

[DrEasy]

Is this available in hard cover?

The length of the posts required for defending Yakemchuk reminds me of those defending Sokolov. Not a good omen...

 

[BondraTime]

Yaks points don’t worry me at all, I was hoping/expecting ~70 points. His offensive skills are apparent, and he’s producing how I expected, give or take.

His defense and skating on the other hand, are worrying me, a large amount.

Say what you want about +/-, when there is a large discrepancy, there is a cause and relation

Yak 0
Parker +36
Aura +11
Williams +33
Myino +9 (19 games)
Hurtig +33

Yak is very, very easily the most skilled, and has a load, load of potential. But the lack progress in the areas I had hoped for some progress worries me.