If you're just going to look at the stats, at least look at the stats.
He is playing a meaningful role on a top 5 team in the league, they are outscoring their opponents by a good margin (+7) with him on the ice despite the fact that they don't really score much. Both of his goals were significant in the context of the game.
+/- is a garbage stat and not worth giving any attemtion to.
Matthew Andonovski was a +58 last year and he's only a +2 this year, but that says little to nothing about his overall play and everything to do with the quality of his team.
As for his minor penalties, 5 of them were plays where the opponent received an equivalent or greater penalty and there are also 2 instances where he was instigated upon, resulting in a game misconduct and additional minor penalty to the opponent. Not to mention, it's the OHL. There are lots of penalties.
I specifically only counted the penalties where there was no offsetting. Didn't count any fights or evened-up roughing penalties in that total of 23.
You can say there's lots of penalties in the OHL, but he's 2nd in the league for total PIMs.
His undisciplined play at every level has continued in the OHL. Not a lot of reason to think that'll stop at higher levels where he'll be put in more difficult defending situations against better players.
He also contributes to a Conference-best PK.
He puts his team on the PK once a game. If a player were doing that in the NHL he wouldn't be on the team for long, especially if he brought zero offense to the table.
He could be prime Lidstrom defensively and if he were taking a dumb penalty every game he'd likely be a net negative contributer.
People need to understand that giving the team a powerplay against unnecessarily is the equivalent of being personally responsible for at least a scoring chance against, if not several, as most powerplays end up producing chances, even if they don't end up turning into goals.
Therefore it's very difficult for an undisciplined player to be good defensively, and that's something our organization has failed to understand for some time now.
It's not like I am singing his praises, saying he was a good pick, or saying that he's been a top player for him. He has, by all accounts, been a useful player for them. But it seems like this one is kind of personal for you.
I didn't like the pick, obviously, and nothing he has done since being drafted has made me doubt that opinion, but I don't harbour anything against Eliasson personally.