Injury Report: 2024 - 2025 Injury Reports

Frenzy31

Registered User
May 21, 2003
7,329
2,188
I’d see what we have internally first. Try Holloway at C. Try Tex at C again. Sundqvist, Walker…but fact remains, the next 6 weeks are probably going to be a struggle. I’m not in favor of paying assets to bring in a short term bandaid solution. Sink or swim with this group. If a trade that makes sense now but also in the future materializes, go for it, but that’s unlikely so I’m not counting on it.

Alexandrov is off to a fast start also. We can bring him up and give him top 9 minutes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STL fan in MN

stl76

No. 5 in your programs, No. 1 in your hearts
Jul 2, 2015
9,484
9,073
I’d see what we have internally first. Try Holloway at C. Try Tex at C again. Sundqvist, Walker…but fact remains, the next 6 weeks are probably going to be a struggle. I’m not in favor of paying assets to bring in a short term bandaid solution. Sink or swim with this group. If a trade that makes sense now but also in the future materializes, go for it, but that’s unlikely so I’m not counting on it.
Pretty much this. Let’s see what we have for the immediate future and re-evaluate if necessary.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STL fan in MN

Robb_K

Registered User
Apr 26, 2007
21,455
11,638
NordHolandNethrlands
Will they have Holloway centre The 3rd Line, or The 2nd? I don't like Schenn at centre anymore. He's a lot better on the wing. I'd play Buchnevich on The 1st Line, Holloway on The 2nd, and try Texier on The 3rd, and put Sundqvist on The 4th, but on the wing, with Faksa at centre.
 
Last edited:

joe galiba

Registered User
Apr 16, 2020
2,206
2,465
Will they have Holloway centre The 3rd Line, or The 2nd? I don't like Schenn at centre anymore. He's a lot better on the wing. I'd play Buchnevich on The 1st Line, Holloway on The 2nd, and try Texier on The 3rd, and put Sundqvist on The 4th.
You forgot Faksa
 

STL fan in MN

Registered User
Aug 16, 2007
7,719
5,324
Will they have Holloway centre The 3rd Line, or The 2nd? I don't like Schenn at centre anymore. He's a lot better on the wing. I'd play Buchnevich on The 1st Line, Holloway on The 2nd, and try Texier on The 3rd, and put Sundqvist on The 4th, but on the wing, with Faksa at centre.
Holloway is playing 3C tonight.

Schenn at 1C but we’ll see how that goes…
 

TurgPavs

Registered User
Jan 7, 2019
522
334
But Thomas was ready. His all around game was much more developed and sending back to the OHL would have been a waste as he had outgrown it.
I agree, but you really dont know what you have with Dvorsky until you throw him out there for a few games.
 

Linkens Mastery

Conductor of the TankTown Express
Jan 15, 2014
20,394
18,123
Hyrule
When Leddy comes Back they should ease him into the lineup on the 3rd pair with POJ or Kessel. Keep Suter with Colt for right now.
 

Brian39

Registered User
Apr 24, 2014
7,598
14,298
Can you imagine if that had been the approach with a 19 year old Robert Thomas?
In his age 19 season, Thomas got 13 minutes a night of highly sheltered minutes. He was 10th or lower on the team in total time on ice and even strength time on ice (total and per game). He also played the lowest quality of competition among all our forwards who played 400+ minutes at 5 on 5 that year.

Additionally, he played significantly more at wing, acting as the team's 6th most frequent center. When they did have him at center, they regularly put another actual center at wing to help cover some of the defensive responsibilities.

So I don't really have to imagine it. The reality is that we very much did not rush Thomas into middle 6 or top 6 center usage in his age 19 season. We bent over backwards to protect him as much as possible since he wasn't AHL eligible and we didn't want to send him back to junior.
 
Last edited:

Brian39

Registered User
Apr 24, 2014
7,598
14,298
I agree, but you really dont know what you have with Dvorsky until you throw him out there for a few games.
You can absolutely evaluate a player in the AHL without throwing him into NHL games. He has played 5 AHL games, which are his first pro games in North America. He was far from NHL ready during his pro games overseas, so we have 5 games worth of data/viewings. That's not remotely close to a sample where you can say that there is nothing more to learn about him before NHL gameplay.

I haven't watched his AHL games, but I'd bet good money that several people in the Blues front office have watched every shift. But I can read a box score and see that he is producing offensively but is tied for worst on the team in +/-. I've read stuff here from posters saying his game isn't close to complete at this point.

I did watch him in the preseason and it was pretty clear to me that he wasn't an NHL player last month. I have a really hard time believing that 5 games in the AHL have meaningfully changed his game to the point where it is anyone's guess how NHL-ready he is.
 

Celtic Note

Living the dream
Dec 22, 2006
17,347
6,320
I agree, but you really dont know what you have with Dvorsky until you throw him out there for a few games.
I have no problem with a couple games just for exposure. But if he isn’t ready, I don’t want him up for 6 weeks or something to that affect.
 

Michael64

Registered User
Aug 20, 2024
8
35
You can absolutely evaluate a player in the AHL without throwing him into NHL games. He has played 5 AHL games, which are his first pro games in North America. He was far from NHL ready during his pro games overseas, so we have 5 games worth of data/viewings. That's not remotely close to a sample where you can say that there is nothing more to learn about him before NHL gameplay.

I haven't watched his AHL games, but I'd bet good money that several people in the Blues front office have watched every shift. But I can read a box score and see that he is producing offensively but is tied for worst on the team in +/-. I've read stuff here from posters saying his game isn't close to complete at this point.

I did watch him in the preseason and it was pretty clear to me that he wasn't an NHL player last month. I have a really hard time believing that 5 games in the AHL have meaningfully changed his game to the point where it is anyone's guess how NHL-ready he is.
I cannot say strongly enough that his long term development is best served in the AHL for a full season. Particularly after he had to jump around several, teams/leagues leading up to this past yr. and settling in well at the OHL. What is the rush? He is doing well for a 19 yr old adjusting to life here and is a key l-term piece for us.

Who cares what the other draft class are doing so early in their careers. Lets measure over time.
 

Reality Czech

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
5,889
9,518
Holloway is playing 3C tonight.

Schenn at 1C but we’ll see how that goes…

His line may be listed at the top of the lineup sheet but I doubt they consider it the definitive 1st line. If anything the top two lines are 1a and 1b. I'd record l expect Bannister to rotate all 4 lines for the most part like he did last game. That 4th line of Sunny Faksa Torpo could be pretty painful for our opponents. Keep your head up with those guys out there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bye Bye Blueston

Stupendous Yappi

Idiot Control Now!
Sponsor
Aug 23, 2018
8,991
14,291
Erwin, TN
His line may be listed at the top of the lineup sheet but I doubt they consider it the definitive 1st line. If anything the top two lines are 1a and 1b. I'd record l expect Bannister to rotate all 4 lines for the most part like he did last game. That 4th line of Sunny Faksa Torpo could be pretty painful for our opponents. Keep your head up with those guys out there.
Agreed. They were rolling the lines pretty much against Toronto. The chemistry is more important than the semantics.
 

TurgPavs

Registered User
Jan 7, 2019
522
334
In his age 19 season, Thomas got 13 minutes a night of highly sheltered minutes. He was 10th or lower on the team in total time on ice and even strength time on ice (total and per game). He also played the lowest quality of competition among all our forwards who played 400+ minutes at 5 on 5 that year.

Additionally, he played significantly more at wing, acting as the team's 6th most frequent center. When they did have him at center, they regularly put another actual center at wing to help cover some of the defensive responsibilities.

So I don't really have to imagine it. The reality is that we very much did not rush Thomas into middle 6 or top 6 center usage in his age 19 season. We bent over backwards to protect him as much as possible since he wasn't AHL eligible and we didn't want to send him back to junior.
If you can shelter a 19 year old Thomas, as you mentioned above, why not do the same with Dvorsky?
 

Brian39

Registered User
Apr 24, 2014
7,598
14,298
If you can shelter a 19 year old Thomas, as you mentioned above, why not do the same with Dvorsky?
That is what we are currently doing by keeping him in the AHL.

We do not have the personnel to shelter him the way we sheltered Thomas in the NHL. We had ROR, Schenn (the 27 year old version), and Bozak as our 3 centers in the top 9 that year. ROR was a legit 1C (good enough to win the Selke that year). Schenn had been a capable 1C the year before and then performed as an above average 2C that season. Bozak was a high end 3C. We had 'plus' level players at the center position on each line, which means that we were trying to plug and play wingers to make everything work.

We are miles from that this year. We have a plethora of wingers that we are trying out at center. We very much don't have the centers to shelter Dvorsky the way we sheltered Thomas in 2018/19. Your suggestion to make Dvorsky the 2C seems to recognize the complete lack of centers, but are you really wondering how the current roster is different from the 2018/19 roster?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad