Brian39
Registered User
- Apr 24, 2014
- 7,163
- 15,793
I think that the ship has likely sailed on William Karlsson potentially getting dealt by Vegas. Their only real incentive to trade him this past summer would have been that he was a luxury that they couldn't fit under the cap. Instead, they elected not to extend Marchessault and made the cap work with him this year. They have more breathing room with the cap for next season, with about $9.5M in space with 18 guys under contract. Olofsson, Reilly Smith, and Hague need to be extended/replaced, but all of them play lesser roles than Karlsson so I'd be surprised if the moved on from Karlsson in order to free up money for them. Schmid will be a cheap backup and they don't strike me as a front office that will be interested in giving a 34 year old Reilly Smith a contract. They clearly prefer Karlsson over Roy as the 3C when everyone is healthy and they really don't need to move his contract.That would be fantastic. Seattle was able to do just that last offseason in free agency at 13.5M with Stephenson and Montour, albeit at max term.
Going exclusively the UFA route, there are options for both.
Duchene, Tavares, Nelson, Bennett for 2C
Ekblad, Fabbro, Perbix for 2RD
Looking at hockey trades,
Pavel Zacha, Ryan McLeod, Sean Monahan, William Karlsson for 2C
Erik Karlsson, Rasmus Andersson, MacKenzie Weegar, Brandt Clarke, Noah Dobson, Braden Schneider for 2RD
I can see Army wanting to push some chips in this offseason. Perhaps a UFA signing and then trading some futures to fill the other spot. The 2019 team was built in the same way. Draft and develop core, add through UFA (Perron, Bozak, Maroon), add pieces via trade (Bouw, Bortz, Sunny, O'Reilly, Schenn, Sanford, Steen)
I feel the same way about Monahan. Columbus just barely missed the playoffs and Monahan was incredible for them. He was their very clear 1C, he's on a fantastic contract, they have tons of cap space, and he has a full NMC. Given he and the organization's ties to Johnny Gaudrea, I'd be very, very surprised if he or the team was interested in him not being a Blue Jacket next year. I don't really see a 'hockey trade' that will make them better in the short-to-medium term and I don't see that organization having any desire to sell for more futures after the year they had.
I think everyone else you listed could be up for grabs to varying degrees.