dahrougem2
Registered User
Does a #1 center kill every penalty, too?then tose teams don't have a true #1
Does a #1 center kill every penalty, too?then tose teams don't have a true #1
Does a #1 center kill every penalty, too?
no but they play every ppDoes a #1 center kill every penalty, too?
Oh so they don't kill every penalty? So they're only playing half the special teams?no but they play every pp
Oh so they don't kill every penalty? So they're only playing half the special teams?
Gotcha. Must not be a true #1C.
Really? Give us a list.5 ? There are all kinds doing it. If your not good enough to play the pp you cannot be considered a #1
You’re the one with the galaxy brain takes on this board, we’re simply trying to apply logic where none exists.You can take mins played , a # 1 will play the most. You want your best players on the ice the most. Especially the most important position which is D
Hard concept I know
shot blockers and workers play forward but your #1 D should be able to kill penalties. They all do. A defenseman impacts the game overall much more than a forward. All day long.Oh so they don't kill every penalty? So they're only playing half the special teams?
Gotcha. Must not be a true #1C.
Lol. No, that's simply not true for all points you made.There is a difference between top pairing and a true #1
shot blockers and workers play forward but your #1 D should be able to kill penalties. They all do. A defenseman impacts the game overall much more than a forward. All day long.
$25k to coach for "inappropriate behavior", $5k to player for illegal check to head, boarding, or slashing that injures another player.
He complained about the officiating. I'm pretty sure he had a legit beef, but the NHL will always, always crack down hard on any sort of criticism of the refs.What'd he do/say? Coaches need a better union I guess
They have to do that.He complained about the officiating. I'm pretty sure he had a legit beef, but the NHL will always, always crack down hard on any sort of criticism of the refs.
I don't think they do, and at the very least if they cracked down on other things that are hampering the overall quality of the game like they do with that, the league would be five times as successful.They have to do that.
The hit on their MacK was the kind that an organization would be very upset by (should have been a penalty, but not as egregious as they'd say), but from there emotions got the best of them.He complained about the officiating. I'm pretty sure he had a legit beef, but the NHL will always, always crack down hard on any sort of criticism of the refs.
If there ever was a Coach's Union, I am 100000000000000% convinced they'd have Mike Babcock run it. And he'd absolutely go full Alan Eagleson in the role.
Believe he was UFA because he didn't get enough games. Frankly I think he'd be in the NHL here today given this roster.