2024/2025 Around the League

sethro109

🏒 🎮🏈🇺🇸🍻
Sponsor
May 3, 2011
28,683
33,286
Centennial, CO
I'd say the outright dismissal of equipment changes is a miss there. There were changes still being finalized until late in the 18-19 season, but it takes time for teams to figure out how the changes impacted goals. Right now we see a lot more goals scored in that armpit area. That is a direct result of two changes in equipment. The chest protector was shrunk and trimmed... and the jersey was required to be tighter. That has allowed goals to start squeaking through. Once teams figured this out, it that spot started being targeted more. Two other major areas impacted are the glove and the shoulders. The glove got shrunk by a little bit, but that little bit has made goalies with weaker glove hands more susceptible to just missing and leaving rebounds... or just missing the puck. The shoulders are impacted on the tight angle shots where shooters are targeting the corners when goalies go down. There used to be an extra bit of padding there. That used to be a very tight window to shoot into... maybe 4x4, but now its closer to 6x8. Doesn't sound like a lot, but with the shooters of today, that a huge difference and gives them a much better chance of success.

TLDR it takes time for equipment changes to change how teams attack. It isn't an on-off switch.


These are directly because of equipment changes. They were not developed or brought up with the technique to account for modern equipment. Goalies developing today will have different technique to counteract the equipment changes.
I just have a hard time putting it all on the equipment change. It just feels like goalies are cheating too much nowadays. They don't want to play based fundamental hockey anymore.
 

dahrougem2

Registered User
Dec 9, 2011
39,404
43,857
Edmonton, Alberta
It's kinda clear rule changes have helped and other factors. Freaking Benn won Art Ross with 87 points 2014-2015. Scoring isn't as hard as it used to be.

87 points for elite player is meh today. Or not amazing at least.
Sure rule changes have helped. Players also improve their shooting year after year. The year Jamie Benn won the Art Ross, Cody McLeod was playing on our 4th line. That guy has one of the worst shots I've ever seen from an NHL player.

Fast forward 10 years and we've got Logan O'Connor on our 4th line who is capable of sniping any goalie in this league if he has time and space to get a shot off.

There has been a HUGE shift towards more skill in the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS

S E P H

Cloud IX
Mar 5, 2010
32,514
17,905
Toruń, PL
- I would say we got worse off goalers because this crop just isn't as good as the crop around 2009, but also because analytics are destroying goalers as well. I've played the position for multiple decades, I def have weaknesses in my game and if a goaler like AV88 is getting destroyed because he has a weak high glove, then he's going to get destroyed there more often as the numbers back it up. He's HOF-worthy easily, but even he's getting abused the last couple of seasons with the rise of analytics.


- This NHL version reminds me a lot of the modern NBA and its transformation the past decade. A lot of mistakes and a lot of offensively-focused players coming into the league.
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
47,905
31,162
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
I don't buy that one at all.

All of a sudden the same players (almost all of them) would be better shooters? The same players that couldn't score 4-5 years ago can score a ton now.

Nope.
Yes, they are better. Even when guys like MacKinnon were just starting out I had never heard of concepts like "disguising your shot," that term became commonplace when Auston Matthews showed up. Since then we've seen a sea change when it comes to how players shoot, to the point where the one-timer is no longer near as ubiquitous as it once was. It's pinpoint wristers that get the job done for most elite scorers.

For example, look how many bad-angled goals get scored nowadays. I'm willing to bet it's a much higher number than it used to be. Shooters can pick spots better than ever before.

I just have a hard time putting it all on the equipment change. It just feels like goalies are cheating too much nowadays. They don't want to play based fundamental hockey anymore.
I don't think that's true. I don't think goalies are necessarily worse, they're just trying to adapt to the smaller equipment and the advent of better shooters. Used to be goalie coaches pushed the "reverse VH" to guard the post, but that left the top of the net vulnerable, and shooters can now bank it off the mask. Now they're telling goalies to just wrap the pad around the post like before. It leaves them more vulnerable to wraparound chances since they can't push off anymore but they're less vulnerable to a bad-angled bank shot.

Also, and this is my speculation, I think teams hate the reverse VH because it can lead to injuries.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Moops

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,131
56,353
Yes, they are better. Even when guys like MacKinnon were just starting out I had never heard of concepts like "disguising your shot," that term became commonplace when Auston Matthews showed up. Since then we've seen a sea change when it comes to how players shoot, to the point where the one-timer is no longer near as ubiquitous as it once was. It's pinpoint wristers that get the job done for most elite scorers.

For example, look how many bad-angled goals get scored nowadays. I'm willing to bet it's a much higher number than it used to be. Shooters can pick spots better than ever before.
Look at this:

Then this:


and tell me that the difference is mainly because NHLers got better in 8 years.
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
47,905
31,162
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
Look at this:

Then this:


and tell me that the difference is mainly because NHLers got better in 8 years.
Yes, I literally just said that and pointed out why.

Again, the equipment changes also have had a significant effect as well.
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,131
56,353
Yes, I literally just said that and pointed out why.

Again, the equipment changes also have had a significant effect as well.
Disregarding scoring eras and saying the change is skill based is the same as saying Matthew Tkachuk and JT Miller are as skilled offensively as prime Patrick Kane and significantly better than prime Crosby.

Or that players in the 90's weren't as good as players in the 80's.

What changed in the last 5 years is not that tons of players magically became all star shooters, it's the way the defensemen are playing and the coaches' systems that are different.
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
47,905
31,162
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
Disregarding scoring eras and saying the change is skill based is the same as saying Matthew Tkachuk and JT Miller are as skilled offensively as prime Patrick Kane and significantly better than prime Crosby.

Or that players in the 90's weren't as good as players in the 80's.

What changed in the last 5 years is not that tons of players magically became all star shooters, it's the way the defensemen are playing and the coaches' systems that are different.
I'm sure there are a number of factors at play, not just one in particular, I just think those factors played significant parts.
 

Chiarelli

Registered User
Jan 27, 2019
5,009
7,007
Naw, it has more to do with equipment restrictions and a marked improvement in shooting.

Also, don't know why but Canada seems to have forgotten how to develop elite netminders.
Nah, if players are better at shooting then goalies are better at saving too.
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
52,131
56,353
I continue to be dumbfounded why the NHL refuses to embrace Friday as a big game day.
I'm not. No one wants to watch hockey on a Friday night.

The best hockey days are Tuesday, Thursday and of course Saturday.
 

LOFIN

Registered User
Sep 16, 2011
16,795
23,773
Me too. None of the other "big" sports want anything to do with it, prime opportunity for them to take it over, and they just refuse to do so.
I just find it stupid that NHL is going over all this effort in marketing towards Europe and even playing games here, yet they refuse to play games on Fridays when that's 50% of what most people here are able to watch. Take few games from tomorrow to today, and play 1 or two more b2b games, and you've got a good set.
 

Pokecheque

I’ve been told it’s spelled “Pokecheck”
Sponsor
Aug 5, 2003
47,905
31,162
The Flatlands
www.armoredheadspace.com
I'm not. No one wants to watch hockey on a Friday night.

The best hockey days are Tuesday, Thursday and of course Saturday.
Speak for yourself. Not only are there no major sporting events on Fridays, there's nothing really on TV either. It'd be the easiest thing in the world to put on a couple games around that time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CobraAcesS

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad