I feel like I'm in an alternate reality when Rycroft is giving it "Georgie in the form we want to see!" while 4 GAA and 0.850 are on the screen in front of us because he's apparently won some games recently.
Not all goals against are created equal. I would argue that he isn't to blame for any of the three goals vs. Edmonton.
First goal: a seam pass to a wide open forward below the hashes. He made a valiant effort to get over and cover as much net as he could, and almost got the save, but Kapanen isn't missing from there.
Second goal: the shot from the point was tipped three feet to the right about 18" from his glove. Human nerve impulses do not travel fast enough to react to that in real time. It's on the defender in front of the net to tie up the stick and make sure the puck stays on course for an easy glove save.
Third goal: A seeing eye point shot through at least four players. Saves on those kinds of shots are purely about luck. George never got the chance to even see the shot come off the stick, and probably didn't even see it until it went past his ear.
Those are basically textbook examples of the kinds of plays where the goalie isn't to blame. The defense can't allow the seam pass to get all the way across, or lose a man in such a dangerous scoring position. They have to tie up sticks to make sure nobody gets a clean tip. And they have to make sure they aren't screening their own goalie, which is something you learn when you're 12.
I don't think you can hold goalies responsible for not making impossible saves. IDC so much about goals allowed and save %, the context is what matters.